Tumor Markers Currently Utilized in Cancer Care
Gaetano Romano (gromano at temple dot edu)
Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Bio-Life Science Bldg. Suite 456, 1900 N 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, U.S.A.
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.5.1456
Date
last modified : 2024-04-06; original version : 2015-09-25
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2015;5:1456
Abstract

A review of tumor markers currently used in cancer care and a summary of antibodies against these tumor markers based on the over 60,000 formal publications in Labome's Validated Antibody Database.

Introduction

Tumor markers are products that may derive from malignant cells and/or other cells of the organism in response to the onset of cancer [1-5]. Their production may also be induced by noncancerous benign tumors [1-5]. Some tumor markers can be detected in malignant tissues obtained from biopsies [6-19], whereas others can be analyzed in the blood, bone marrow, urine, or other body fluids [20-25]. Sometimes, tumor markers may also be observed in cancer-free subjects, but in much lower levels than oncological patients. In addition, relatively high levels of a certain tumor marker might develop from various non-malignant pathological conditions, such as liver diseases, inflammations, kidney-related dysfunctions, infections and hematological disorders. On these grounds, high levels of a certain tumor marker in the blood, or in other body fluids might indicate the presence of a malignancy. However, per se, this finding is not sufficient to substantiate the diagnosis of cancer. For this reason, the analysis of tumor markers in the blood, or other fluids must be combined with the analysis of biopsies, or other tests in order to confirm the diagnosis. The detection of tumor markers can be used for a wide variety of malignancies and for a number of applications, which may comprise diagnosis, follow-up the clinical course of the disease, optimize the efficacy of the treatment, assess the response to therapy and monitor the recurrence of the disease [1-5]. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provide the guidelines for the proper utilization of tumor markers in cancer care, which must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in order to be used in the clinical setting of the United States of America. FDA maintains an updated list of cleared or approved companion diagnostic devices. This article describes the methods that are adopted for the detection of tumor markers that are currently used in cancer care, along with new strategies that aim at developing personalized medicine programs for the treatment of malignancies. The benefits from the populationwise routine screening of some tumor markers are under evaluation [26].

Tumor marker Type of tumor/tumors Application
21-Gene signature (Oncotype DX)Breast cancerAssess the risk of tumor recurrence
70-Gene signature (Mammaprint)Breast cancerAssess the risk of tumor recurrence
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) (mutations)Non-small cell lung cancer and anaplastic large cell lymphomaDiagnosis and determine the type of treatment
BRAF (mutations)Melanoma, colorectal cancer and thyroid cancerDiagnosis and determine the type of treatment in patients with melanoma
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), or HER1Cancers of the breast, head and neck, non-small cell lung, pancreas and colonPredict outcomes and determine the type of treatment
FoundationOne CDxNon-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, cancers of the breast, colon and ovariesDiagnosis and determine type of treatment
HER2, or HER2/neu, erbB-2, EGFR2Cholangiocarcinoma [27], breast cancer, stomach cancer and esophageal cancerPredict outcomes and determine the type of treatment
Hormone receptor (estrogen and progesterone)Breast cancer and gynecologic malignancies, such as endometrial stromal sarcomas and endometrial cancersPredict outcomes and determine the type of treatment
KITGastrointestinal stromal tumor and mucosal melanomaDiagnosis and determine the type of treatment
KRAS (mutations)Advanced colorectal cancer and lung cancerDetermine the type of treatment
PIK3CA mutationBreast cancerTo assess the aggressiveness of the malignancy and determine the type of treatment
S-100MelanomaDiagnosis. Blood tests allow for the follow-up of the clinical course of the disease
Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1)Breast cancerTo assess the aggressiveness of the malignancy and determine the type of treatment
Table 1. List of tumor markers that are detected in malignant tissues, other than the blood.
Tumor Markers Detected in Malignant Tissues

The detection of these tumor markers requires the removal of a biopsy from the patient [6-8, 10-16, 27]. In certain cases, biopsy-derived tumor markers are utilized just once, to confirm a diagnosis. For example, Yarlagadda B et al determined ERBB2 amplification in a case of metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with circulating tumor DNA testing (“liquid biopsy”) and confirmed the diagnosis by regular tissue-based testing [27]. Table 1 summarizes tumor markers that are analyzed in malignant tissues.

21-Gene signature (Oncotype DX)

This set of markers is utilized to assess the risk of the reappearance of the tumor in patients with breast cancer [9, 28, 29]. The 21-gene signature comprises genes that are related to the estrogen receptor (ESR1, PGR, BCL2, SCUBE2), HER2 (HER2 and GRB7), cell proliferation (Ki67, STK15, survivin, cyclin B1, MYBL2), cellular invasion (stromelysin3, cathepsin L2), macrophage marker CD68, anti-apoptotic genes (BAG1 and GSTM1) and five housekeeping genes that are used as reference (actin, GAPDH, RPLPO, GUS and TFRC) [28]. Oncotype DX is a type of gene-expression profiling that requires RNA samples derived from paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies and was introduced in the U.S.A. market in 2004 (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) [30].

70-Gene signature (MammaPrint)

This set of markers is utilized to assess the risk of the recurrence of the tumor in patients with breast cancer (for a review see references 31-35). In contrast to the 21-Gene signature (Oncotype DX), this assay needs preparation of fresh tissues in a solution designed to preserve the integrity of RNA molecules [31]. Agendia Inc. (Irvine, CA) provides the MammaPrint 70-gene signature test.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)

The ALK gene is analyzed for the presence of mutations [32-34]. This tumor marker may provide useful information both for the prognosis and to determine the type of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) [32-34]. If mutations are present, the patient can be treated with crizotinib (or Xalkori), which is a protein kinase inhibitor that targets the aberrant ALK kinase [32, 34]. However, crizotinib interferes also with some other protein kinases [35, 36]. ALK mutation assay analyzes tissues using various techniques, such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [34]. FDA approved in 2011 the ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit (Abbot Vysis, Schaumburg, IL). This procedure requires unstained tissues, which are hybridized overnight with the probe and then analyzed by fluorescence microscopy [34]. IHC-based techniques work well for the ALK detection in ALCL; however, IHC-based ALK detection is not efficient in NSCLC biopsies, because of lower levels of ALK protein. IHC detection of ALK in ALCL utilizes the following antibodies: ZAL4 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 5A4 (Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) and D5F3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Lastly, PCR-derived techniques can detect the presence of ALK in NSCLC with various protocols, which comprise reverse-transcriptase multiplexed PCR and RT-PCR [34].

BRAF

Mutations of the BRAF gene may be present in melanoma [11, 37, 38], colorectal cancer [39, 40] and thyroid cancer [41, 42]. This tumor marker is used for the diagnosis and to determine the type of treatment in patients with melanoma [11, 37, 38]. The so-called BRAF V600E mutation may be detected in approximately 50% of cases of melanoma [43]. Patients with advanced melanoma can be treated with vemurafenib (or Zelboraf) if mutations in the BRAF gene are found [44, 45]. Vemurafenib can target the abnormal BRAF protein [44-46]. Various assays are currently available for the detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which may also be mounted on slides. Such assays comprise techniques based on pyrosequencing (Laboratory Corporation of America, Burlington, NC), dideoxy sequencing (Quest Diagnostics Inc., Madison, NJ; Vanderbilt Pathology Laboratory Service, Nashville, TN) and PCR either with or without fluorescence monitoring (ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT; Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester, MN; UNC Health Care McLendon Clinical Laboratories, Chapel Hill, NC).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)

EGFR is also termed HER1 [47, 48]. The overexpression of this cell surface receptor may be indicative of poor clinical outcomes, as cancerous tissues growth fast, malignant cells spread rapidly and the tumor tends to be more resilient to the treatment [47-51]. EGFR may be used to predict outcomes and to determine the type of treatment for cancers of the breast [52-55], head and neck [56-58], non-small cell lung [33, 50, 59, 60], pancreas [61, 62] and colon [63-65]. Tumor tissues must be prepared in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. A real-time PCR test analyses mutations in exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the EGFR gene, which may be present in DNA obtained from FFPE human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor tissues (Roche Diagnostics, cobas® EGFR Mutation Test, Indianapolis, IN). Another PCR-based method utilizes the therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR Kit - P120022 kit (QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, U.K.) for the analysis of FFPE human NSCLC tumor tissue-derived DNA. A qualitative IHC-based system utilizes the EGFR pharmDxTM kit to monitor EGFR expression levels in normal and malignant tissues of the colon and of head and neck squamous carcinoma, which must be fixed for histological analysis (Dako North America, Inc., Carpinteria, CA). A chromogenic in situ hybridization CISH protocol was developed for the analysis of FFPE breast cancer tissues (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., New York. NY). FFPE breast cancer tissue may also be analyzed by IHC, utilizing a monoclonal antibody to EGFR (Clone 31G7, Zymed Laboratories, Inc., New York. NY).

On June 6, 2016, a report showed that FDA approved the first liquid test for the diagnosis of a gene mutation associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and was developed by Roche Diagnostic. This kit is based on a real-time PCR assay and requires DNA samples obtained from the plasma of patients with NSCLC. This technique offers a remarkable advantage, as it allows for the analysis of EGFR-associated mutations without the removal of a tumor biopsy, which in many cases may not be easily accessible. The assay requires 5 to 7 days and can be utilized for the identification of 42 mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR gene, along with the EGFR resistance mutation T790M. Based on the genetic testing results, oncologists may optimize the chemotherapeutic treatment for patients with NSCLC. For instance, the EGFR resistance mutation T790M requires the use of Tagrisso® (osimertinib), whereas Tarceva® (erlotinib) is more indicated for the treatment of patients with NSCLC that test positive for exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation. Tarceva® can also be used for the treatment of NSCLC that carries the following mutations in the EGFR gene: G719X, exon 20 insertions, T790M, S768I, and L861Q. Interestingly, Tagrisso® (osimertinib) can be utilized for the treatment of patients with NSCLC that test positive for this other EGFR mutations: G719X, exon 19 deletions, L858R, exon 20 insertions, S768I and L861Q.

The EGFR Mutation Test v2 (US-IVD) can also be used on DNA samples that derive from formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumor biopsies.

FGFR

On April 12th, 2019, the FDA has approved a novel targeted therapy for bladder cancer developed by Janssen Pharmaceutical. The new compound was termed erdafitinib, whereas the brand name is Balversa. Balversa is the first FDA-approved targeted treatment of patients with advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancers, which carry genetic modifications in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) or FGFR2 genes and were refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy [66].

The FDA has also approved the use of FGFR RGQ RT-PCR Kit (QIAGEN Manchester, Ltd.) as a companion diagnostic for Balversa. The QIAGEN’s test allows for the identification of patients that carry modifications in the FGFR3 or FGFR2 genes and might respond to the Balversa regimen.

Bladder cancer is the sixth most common malignancy in the U.S.A. FGFR genetic alterations can be detected in the order of one in five patients with recurrent and refractory bladder cancer. A clinical trial tested the efficacy of Balversa in 87 patients either with locally advanced, or metastatic bladder cancer with FGFR3 or FGFR2 genetic abnormalities, which were refractory to chemotherapy. A complete response was observed in 2.3% of patients, whereas a partial response was reported in nearly 30% of cases. These clinical data were obtained in a timeframe of five-and-a-half months. Typical side effects comprised changes in liver and/or kidney functions, low counts of red blood cells (anemia), fatigue, nausea, loss of appetite, diarrhea, stomach pain, muscle pain, mouth sores, dry mouth, dry skin, reduced formation of the nail, or nails separating from the bed, dry eyes and hair loss.

In some cases, Balversa may trigger severe eye problems, such as inflamed eyes, inflamed cornea, and illnesses of the retina. Therefore, patients must undergo eye examination and must report to health care providers if they experience blurred vision or other types of visual modifications.

HER2

HER2 is also known as HER2/neu, erbB-2, or EGFR2 [67]. This cellular receptor may contribute to the growth and/or dissemination of certain types of tumors [14, 27, 67, 68]. HER2 overexpression is found in 20% of patients with breast cancer [13]. High HER2 expression levels may also be observed in tumors of the stomach [69-71], esophageal cancers [72, 73], and cholangiocarcinoma [27]. The analysis of HER2 expression can be utilized to predict outcomes and to define a line of treatment for breast cancer [13, 14] and advanced stomach cancer [74, 75]. FFPE tumor tissues can be tested for HER2 status either via IHC, or FISH analysis, which utilizes probes contained in the following kits: PathVision (Abbott France SAS, Rungis, France) pharmDx (Dako France SAS, Trappes, France), INFORM (Ventana Medical Systems SA, Ilkirch, France). IHC assays can be carried out either with anti-human HER2 polyclonal antibodies A0485 (Dako France SAS, Trappes, France), the HerceoTest kit (Dako France SAS, Trappes, France), or the FDA-approved Roche PATHWAY anti-HER2 (4B5) test.

Hormone receptors

All biopsies from patients with breast cancer are tested for estrogen and progesterone receptors [76]. These hormones can stimulate the proliferation of breast cancer cells [76]. Estrogen receptor expressing breast cancer cells are termed ER-positive, whereas progesterone receptor expressing breast cancer cells are termed PR-positive [76]. Approximately two-thirds of breast cancers result positive for at least one of these two hormone receptors [76]. The analysis of hormone receptors in breast cancer cells and some gynecologic cancers may be utilized for the diagnosis and to determine whether hormone therapy is suitable or not for the treatment of the malignancy [76-82]. A typical example of hormone therapy is based on tamoxifen [76]. The gynecologic cancers that can be tested for hormone receptors comprise endometrial stromal sarcomas [83, 84] and endometrial cancers [85-87]. Typically, the ER expression levels in breast cancer tissues can be detected by IHC, with monoclonal antibody ID5 (Dako Cytomation Carpinteria, CA). Another possible system for monitoring estrogen receptor expression levels is based on PET scan. 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) is used as a tracer for the PET imaging of ER molecules in breast cancer patients. 18F is generated with a cyclotron (Siemens Eclipse Cyclotron, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany; Scanditronix MC-50, Uppsala, Sweden) [83]. 18F-FES synthesis can be conducted as described [83]. Typically, patients receive injections of 222 MBq radiopharmaceutical in 20 ml of isotonic phosphate-buffered saline that contains less than 15% ethanol by volume. The molecular mass and radiochemical and chemical purity of 18F-FES must be evaluated after each synthesis with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (Waters 2690 HPLC, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA; MicroMass ZMD (ES2), Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). Radiochemical purity must be in the range of 98%, whereas the specific activity must be higher than 37 x 1012 Bq/mmol at the time of injection. Patients are positioned supine and imaged with a GE Healthcare Advance PET scanner (Little Chalfont, UK).

PR expression levels in breast cancer can be assessed by IHC, with monoclonal antibody 636 (Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA).

KIT

The proto-oncogene KIT is a transmembrane protein, which is also termed CD117 [88]. This proto-oncogene is associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumor [88] and mucosal melanoma [89]. The analysis of this marker is utilized for the diagnosis of the illness and to determine the type of therapeutic intervention in oncological patients with these two types of malignancies [88]. KIT can be detected by IHC in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and mucosal melanoma FFPE tissue sections, by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against human KIT (Code number A-4502, dilution 1:100; Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA).

KRAS

Mutations in the KRAS gene may enhance chemo-resistance in advanced colorectal cancer [90, 91] and certain lung tumors [92-94]. For instance, cetuximab (or Erbitux) and panitumumab (or Vectibix) are used for the targeting of EGFR in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [95]. However, both cetuximab and panitumumab become virtually useless in patients who carry the mutated KRAS gene and, therefore, these two drugs cannot be administered in therapy. Similarly, KRAS mutations may render some lung cancers more resistant to erlotinib (or Tarceva) and gefitinib (or Iressa) [96-99]. On these grounds, the analysis of KRAS mutations may provide useful information on the type of treatment that has to be adopted for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and certain forms of lung tumors [90]. KRAS gene mutations can be detected with a real-time PCR kit provided by Entrogen, Inc. (Woodland Hills, CA).

PI3K

On May 24th 2019, the FDA has approved a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor termed Piqray developed by Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) for the treatment of postmenopausal women and men either with advanced or metastatic breast cancer, which is hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and PIK3CA-mutation. Piqray is also known as alpelisib and is administered orally in combination with fulvestrant, an FDA-approved therapeutic for endocrine-bsed regimen. About 40% of breast cancer patients have a PIK3CA mutation, which is associated with a poor prognosis.

In addition, the FDA approved the use of the companion diagnostic test termed therascreen PIK3CA RGQ PCR Kit (QIAGEN Manchester, Ltd.), for the detection of PIK3CA mutation in tissues and/or in liquid biopsies in the form of circulating tumor DNA.

Patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer are initially tested for the presence of PIK3CA mutation in circulating tumor DNA that is present in the peripheral blood. If the liquid biopsy analysis should result negative, the PIK3CA mutation testing will be conducted on patient-derived tumor biopsies, in order to confirm either the absence or the presence of PIK3CA mutation in malignant tissues.

S-100

S-100 is present in the majority of melanoma cells and may be utilized for the diagnosis of melanoma, following the removal of a biopsy from the patient [17, 18, 100]. This marker can also be detected with blood tests, which allow for the monitoring of the spreading of melanoma before and/or in response to the treatment [101]. S-100 can be detected in FFPE tissue sections with antibodies provided by Dako Cytomation (Carpinteria, CA).

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1)

These two markers are analyzed to assess the aggressiveness of the malignancy and to determine the type of treatment in patients with breast cancer [8, 102, 103]. An ELISA kit is currently available for the detection of uPA (American Diagnostics, Greenwich, CT). For this protocol, breast tumor biopsies are initially frozen at -70oC. Subsequently, tumor tissues are homogenized in 50 mM Tris HCl pH = 7.4, supplemented with 1 mM monothioglycerol (1:7; w/v). The homogenate is then centrifugated at 2, 000 g for 10 minutes and the supernatant is extracted with 1% Triton X-100. Another centrifugation step is carried out at 10, 000 g for 20 minutes. After this centrifugation, uPA can be detected with the aforementioned ELISA kit. The same protocol for the extraction of uPA can be utilized for PAI-1, which is then detected with another ELISA kit (Monozyme, Horsholm, Denmark).

Tumor marker Type of tumor/tumors Tissue and/or fluid tested Application Possible cross-reaction with noncancerous conditions
5-Protein signature (Ova1)Ovarian cancerBlood.Assess malignancy of pelvic mass for suspected ovarian cancer prior to surgery-
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)Liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma); germ cell tumors; testicular cancerBloodDiagnose liver cancer and follow response to therapy. Evaluate stage, prognosis and response to therapy of germ cell tumorsAcute and chronic hepatitis
BCR-ABLChronic myeloid leukemia (CML)Blood, bone marrowDiagnose chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and follow response to therapy-
Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M)Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); multiple myeloma; a number of lymphomas, comprising Waldenstrom macroglobulinemiaBlood, urine, cerebrospinal fluidPrognosis and response to therapyHepatitis and kidney disease
Bladder tumor antigen (BTA)Bladder cancerUrineDiagnosis and follow-up clinical course of the disease. This test is less efficient than cystoscopyUrinary tract infections and kidney stones
CA 15-3Breast cancer. This marker can also be found in tumors of the ovaries, lung, pancreas and colon.BloodDiagnosis and follow-up clinical course of the diseaseBenign breast tumors, hepatitis; ovarian disease and endometriosis
CA 19-9Colorectal cancer; pancreatic cancer; bladder cancer. High levels can also be found in other tumors of the digestive tract, such as bile ducts and stomach.Blood.Diagnosis and follow-up clinical course of the diseaseRheumatoid arthritis, thyroid disease, pancreatitis and inflammatory bowel disease
CA 27-29Breast cancer. High levels of this marker are also associated with cancers of the uterus, ovary, kidney, liver, pancreas, stomach, colon and lung.Blood.Diagnosis and follow-up clinical course of the disease.Women in the first trimester of pregnancy; ovarian cysts; endometriosis; non-cancerous breast disease; kidney stones; liver disease
CA 125Epithelial ovarian cancer; primary peritoneal cancer; fallopian tube cancer; uterine cancer. High levels of this marker can also be found in women and men with cancer of the liver, lung, colon, breast and pancreas.BloodFollow up response to therapyEndometriosis; uterine fibroids
CalcitoninMedullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). High levels of this marker can also be found in leukemias and lung cancers.BloodDiagnosis-
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)Colorectal cancer; breast cancer; lung cancer. High levels of this marker can also be found in other malignancies, such as leukemia, melanoma and cancer of the liver, pancreas, thyroid, stomach, prostate, kidney, cervix, ovary and bladder.BloodDiagnosis and screeningHepatitis; rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pancreatitis, colitis and smokers without cancer
CD20Non-Hodgkin lymphomaBloodDetermine the efficacy of therapy-
Chromogranin A (CgA)Neuroendocrine tumors, such as neuroblastoma, carcinoid tumors; small cell lung cancer. High levels of this marker can also be found in advanced prostate cancer.BloodDiagnosis-
Chromosomes 3, 7, 17 aneuploidy and loss of 9p21 locus.Bladder cancer.Urine.Monitor relapse of the disease.-
Cytokeratin fragments 21-1Lung cancerBloodMonitor relapse of the disease-
Fibrin/fibrinogenBladder cancerUrineFollow-up clinical course of the disease and response to therapy-
FoudationOne HemeHematological malignancies and sarcomasBlood and/or bone marrowDiagnosis and determine type of treatment -
FoundationOne LiquidNon-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, cancers of the breast, colon and ovariesCirculating tumor DNA obtained from peripheral blood samplesDiagnosis and determine type of treatment -
FoundationOne Liquid CDxProstate cancer and non-small cell lung cancerCirculating tumor DNA obtained from peripheral blood samplesDiagnosis and determine response to therapy-
HE4Ovarian cancerBloodFollow-up clinical course of the disease and monitor for relapse of the illness-
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)Some types of germ cell tumors; ovarian cancer; testicular cancer; choriocarcinoma.BloodDiagnosis, follow-up response to therapy and monitor relapse of the disease-
Immunoglobulins (monoclonal gammopathy)Excessive levels of immunoglobulin M (IgM) are associated with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia; in multiple myeloma high levels of IgG are frequently observed, followed by IgA and IgM.BloodDiagnose and follow-up response to therapy-
Free light chains of immunoglobulins, or Bence Jones protein if found in the urineMultiple myelomaBlood; urineDiagnosis and to guide treatment-
InhibinOvarian stromal cancerBloodDiagnosis and monitor for relapse of the disease-
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)Testicular cancer; germ cell tumors; melanoma; neuroblastoma; lymphomaBloodPrognosis, follow-up response to therapy and monitor for relapse of the disease.Liver disease, hematological illnesses, muscle injury, heart attack and stroke
Neuron-specific enolase (NSE)Neuroendocrine tumors, such as neuroblastoma, carcinoid tumors; small cell lung cancer. High levels of this marker are also found in melanoma, pancreatic endocrine tumors and medullary thyroid cancer.BloodFollow-up response to therapy-
Nuclear Matrix protein 22 (NMP22)Bladder cancerUrineDiagnosisThis marker can be present in the urine of patients who had a recent chemotherapy intervention.
PIK3CA mutationBreast cancerBlood (circulating tumor DNA)Diagnosis, monitor the clinical course of the disease and determine the type of treatment
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)Prostate cancerBloodDiagnosis, follow-up response to therapy and monitor the clinical course of the diseaseBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), infection of the prostate and inflammation of the prostate
Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)Prostate cancer; multiple myeloma; lung cancerBloodDiagnosis-
S-100MelanomaBloodDiagnosis and monitor the clinical course of the disease-
Soluble mesothelin-related peptides (SMRP)MesotheliomaBloodDiagnosis and monitor relapse of the disease-
ThyroglobulinThyroid cancerBloodDiagnosis, follow-up response to therapy and monitor for relapse of the diseaseNoncancerous thyroid diseases. Some individuals may have immunoglobulin anti-thyroglobulin, which interfere with the analysis.
Table 2. List of tumor markers that are detected in the blood and/or other body fluids.
Tumor Markers That Are Detected in the Blood or Fluids

The analysis of tumor markers that are present in the blood and/or body fluids is usually conducted routinely on patients diagnosed with various types of malignancies, to follow the clinical course of the disease and/or to assess the response to therapy and/or to monitor the reappearance of the tumor. In some cases, the detection of tumor markers in the blood and/or body fluid may be carried out in conjunction with other pathological tests to confirm a diagnosis [104-106].

5-Protein signature (Ova1)

Ova1 comprises five different proteins, such as CA 125, β-2-microglobulin (B2M), ApoA1, transthyretin (TT) and transferrin (TF) [20, 107-109]. This set of markers is detected in the blood of patients with ovarian cancer and is conducted before surgery to determine if a malignancy is present in a pelvic mass, which is usually indicative of ovarian cancer [20, 107-109]. Serological OVA1 tests are carried out by Vermillion, Inc. (Austin TX).

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)

AFP is tested in the blood. High levels of AFP might be associated either with hepatocellular carcinoma [21, 110-112] or with germ cell tumors [112-115]. However, patients with acute and chronic hepatitis also exhibit high levels of AFP [21, 110-112]. As it stands, this marker can be used to diagnose liver cancer and to follow-up the response to therapy [21, 110-112]. In addition, AFP is utilized to evaluate the stage, prognosis and response to treatment of patients with germ cell tumors, which may comprise rare forms of ovarian cancer, such as yolk sac tumor, or mixed germ cell cancer, some testicular cancers and mediastinal germ cell tumors [113-116]. An ELISA kit is currently available for AFP serum detection (Catalog number: EK-310-09; Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Burlingame, CA).

BCR-ABL

This marker is present only in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells and derives from a specific chromosomal translocation, which produces the so-called Philadelphia chromosome [117-123]. Such a translocation takes place between chromosome 9 and chromosome 22 and is termed t(9;22)(q34;q11). As a consequence, the Abl1 gene on chromosome 9 (region q34) is fused in frame with the BCR (breakpoint cluster region) gene on chromosome 22 (region q11). The resulting fusion gene is termed BCR-ABL, which is tested either in the blood or in the bone marrow via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition to the diagnosis of CML, BCR-ABL may be used to follow the response to therapy and can be analyzed with a real-time PCR kit (QuantidexTM BCR-ABL IS CMR Kit; Asuragen, Austin, TX) [117-123].

Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M)

B2M exhibits elevated levels of expression in the blood of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [25, 124-128], multiple myeloma [129-134] and a number of lymphomas [135-137], comprising Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia [138-141]. This marker can be detected in the blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid [25, 124-142]. B2M is useful for the prognosis and to monitor the response to therapy for the treatment of CLL. High levels of B2M may also be observed in subjects with hepatitis [143, 144] and kidney disease [145]. B2M expression levels in clinical samples can be assessed with a solid phase Elisa kit (R&D Systems, Inc.; Minneapolis, MN).

Bladder tumor antigen (BTA)

This marker is present in the urine of patients with bladder cancer and is utilized for the diagnosis and to follow-up the clinical course of the malady [146-149]. However, this test is less efficient than cystoscopy [146-149]. BTA may also be present in the urines of subjects with certain noncancerous conditions, such as infections of the urinary tract [150] and kidney stones [151]. BTA levels in the urine can be evaluated either qualitatively with the BTA stat® test, (Polymedco Inc., Cortlandt Manor, NY), or quantitatively with the BTA TRAK® test (Polymedco, Inc.; Cortlandt Manor, NY). The latter test requires trained personnel.

CA 15-3

CA 15-3 is the acronym of Carcinoma Antigen 15-3. This marker is detected in the blood and is associated with breast cancer [24, 152-154]. It may also be found in malignancies of the ovaries [155], lung [156], pancreas [157] and colon [158, 159]. CA 15-3 is used for the diagnosis and to monitor the clinical course of breast cancer. This marker may also be detected in benign breast tumors [160, 161], hepatitis [161], ovarian disease and endometriosis [162, 163]. An Elisa kit is commercially available for the detection of CA 15-5 in the serum (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

CA 19-9

CA 19-9 stands for Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 [164, 165]. Levels of CA 19-9 are detected in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer [164, 165] and malignancies of the pancreas [166, 167] (but not among patients afflicted with a newly defined sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm [168] ), and the bladder [169, 170]. High levels of CA 19-9 are also found in other tumors of the digestive tract, such as bile ducts and stomach [171, 172]. Hematological levels of CA 19-9 may be utilized for the diagnosis and to monitor the clinical course of malignancies of the colorectal tract, pancreas, and bladder [159, 164-167, 169, 170]. This marker may also be present in the blood of subjects who are affected by noncancerous illnesses, such as rheumatoid arthritis [173], thyroid disease [174], pancreatitis [175] and inflammatory bowel disease [176]. Engle DD et al inducibly expressed human fucosyltransferase 3 and β1,3-galactosyltransferase 5 in mice and showed that CA19-9 promoted pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in mice [177]. The detection of CA 19-9 in the blood of patients is based on EMD Millipore Luminex MagPIX multiplex ELISA platform [177], or other ELISA kits.

CA 27-29

CA 27-29, or Cancer Antigen 27-29, is detected in the blood of patients with breast cancer [24, 152, 178]. High CA 27-29 levels may also be present in patients with cancers of the uterus, ovary, kidney, liver, pancreas, stomach, colon and lung [179]. CA 27-29 is an additional marker utilized for the diagnosis and follow-up the clinical course of breast cancer before and/or after the therapy. However, not all the patients with breast cancer exhibit high levels of CA 27-29 [150, 180-182]. Besides, considerable CA 27-29 levels may be present in subjects who do not have cancer, such as women in the first trimester of pregnancy [183], or with noncancerous breast disease [184]. CA 27-29 may also be associated with ovarian cysts [185], endometriosis [186], kidney stones [186] and liver disease [186]. CA 27-29 can be detected in the blood with an Elisa kit (MyBioSource, Inc.; San Diego, CA).

CA 125

CA 125 is the acronym of Cancer Antigen 125, Carcinoma Antigen 125, or Carbohydrate Antigen 125 [187, 188]. CA 125 may also be termed either mucin 16, or MUC16 [187, 188]. This marker is present in the blood of women affected with epithelial ovarian cancer [189-191], primary peritoneal cancer [192-196] and fallopian tube cancer [197, 198]. High levels of CA 125 can also be present in the blood of patients with malignancies of the liver, lung, colon, breast, and pancreas [154]. This marker is typically used for the follow-up of the response to therapy of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer [189, 190, 192, 195, 196]. Considerable levels of CA 125 may be found in women with noncancerous conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids [199]. High CA 125 levels are also observed in patients with advanced heart failure [200, 201].

Calcitonin

This marker is present in the blood of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and is utilized for the diagnosis of the disease [202, 203]. High levels of calcitonin may also be observed in the blood of patients with leukemia [204, 205] and lung cancers [206, 207]. An Elisa kit can be utilized for the quantification of Calcitonin in human serum (ALPCO; Salem NH).

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

CEA is detected in the blood and is utilized for the diagnosis and screening of colorectal cancer [164, 208-212], breast cancer [153, 213, 214] and lung cancer [215]. Considerable levels of CEA may also be observed in the blood of patients with leukemia [216], melanoma [217], and malignancies of the liver [217], pancreas [218], thyroid [219], stomach [220], prostate [221], kidney [222], cervix [223], ovary [224] and bladder [225]. However, CEA may also be found in blood samples of subjects with hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pancreatitis, colitis and smokers without cancer [217]. CEA can be detected with an Elisa kit (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

CD20

This marker is detected in the blood of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma [226, 227]. CD20 is utilized to determine the efficacy of the therapeutic intervention [226, 227] and can be measured with an Elisa kit (MyBioSource, Inc.; San Diego, CA).

Chromogranin A (CgA)

This marker is detected in the blood and is used to diagnose neuroendocrine tumors, such as neuroblastoma, carcinoid tumors, and small cell lung cancer [228-231]. High CgA levels can also be found in advanced prostate cancer [232]. CgA expression levels can be assessed with an Elisa kit (Epitope Diagnostic, Inc.; San Diego, CA).

Chromosomes 3, 7, 17 aneuploidy and loss of 9p21 locus

This chromosomal analysis is conducted with Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) of urologic cytology samples (PersonalizeDx, Rosetta GenomicsTM; Lake Forest, CA) [233, 234]. These chromosomal markers are utilized to monitor the recurrence of malignancies in the urinary tract [233, 234].

Chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)

This marker is detected in the blood of patients with some types of germ cell tumors, such as ovarian cancer [235-237], testicular cancer [114, 238, 239] and choriocarcinoma [240-242]. HCG is utilized for the diagnosis, to follow-up the response to therapy and to monitor the relapse of the disease [114, 235-242]. An Elisa kit is available to detect HCG in the serum (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) blood test

A circulating free DNA (cfDNA) blood test was recently described in a clinical report published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which was conducted for the non-invasive screening of patients with colorectal cancer [243]. Based on the colonoscopy analysis, 7861 subjects were classified as eligible for the clinical validation study of the cfDNA blood test. The selected subjects had colorectal cancer (stage I, stage II and stage III), or precancerous lesions, which were either advanced, or non-advanced stage [243]. Volumes of peripheral blood samples ranging from 30 to 80 ml were drawn from the patients and analyzed for the presence of cfDNA [243]. Briefly, the blood samples were collected in Streck cfDNA blood-collection tubes, sent at room temperature to a central biorepository, where the samples were processed for the extraction of the plasma, which was stored at −80°C and then shipped to Guardant Health laboratory (Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.) for the analysis of cfDNA associated with colorectal cancer, such as genomic alterations, aberrant methylation status and fragmentomic patterns [243]. The cfDNA results were correlated with the clinical outcomes for analysis by the contract research organization [243]. In total, 83.1% of the subjects enrolled in the clinical validation study tested positive for the cfDNA test, whereas 16.9% exhibited a negative result [243]. The outcomes of the tests were consistent with the presence of malignancies at different stages, or with advanced or non-advanced precancerous lesions [243].

Cytokeratin fragments 21-1

Cytokeratin fragments 21-1 can also be termed Cyfra 21-1 [244, 245]. This marker is detected in the blood of patients with lung cancer and is used to monitor the relapse of the disease [244, 245]. Serum Cyfra 21-1 can be measured with a solid-phase immunoradiometric assay (CIS Biointernational, Gif Yvette, France).

Fibrin/fibrinogen

This marker is found in the urine of patients with bladder cancer and is utilized to follow-up the clinical course of the disease and to monitor the response to therapy [246-248]. An Elisa kit is available for the detection of human fibrin/fibrinogen in the urines (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

FoundationOne CDx

The FDA has recently approved two new diagnostic kits developed by FoundationOne Liquid CDx (https://www.foundationmedicine.com/press-releases/445c1f9e-6cbb-488b-84ad-5f133612b721). The FoundationOne diagnostic platforms were previously described in the update of July 3rd, 2019 and are based on DNA analysis that derives either from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue specimens (FoundationOne CDx, see Table 1), or from blood-derived circulting tumor DNA samples (FoundationOne Heme and FoundationOne Liquid, see Table 2). The two new FoundationOne Liquid CDx kits are based on the analysis of circulating tumor DNA obtained from peripheral blood samples (Table 2).

One FoundationOne Liquid CDx kit was designed to detect BRCA1, BRCA2 alterations in circulating tumor DNA for the therapeutic assessment of the first PARP inhibitor that was approved for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer (Table 2). The PARP inhibitor was termed Rubraca® (rucaparib). The second kit can be utilized to determine the clinical response of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to one of the following tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): IRESSA® (gefitinib), TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) and TARCEVA® (erlotinib) (Table 2). The second kit was designed for the analysis of EGFR Exon 19 deletions and EGFR Exon 21 L858R substitution in circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

The new FoundationOne Liquid CDx kits are already commercially available (https://www.foundationmedicine.com/info/detail/order-a-test).

HE4

HE4 is the acronym of Human Epididymis Protein 4 [249]. This marker is detected in the blood of patients with ovarian cancer and is used to follow-up the clinical course of the disease and to monitor the recurrence of the tumor [250]. Serum HE4 can be measured with an Elisa kit (MyBioSource, Inc.; San Diego, CA).

Immunoglobulins (monoclonal gammopathy)

Abnormal patterns of specific immunoglobulins expression may be detected in the blood of patients with some hematological malignancies [251, 252]. For instance, high levels of immunoglobulin M (IgM) are associated with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia [139, 253, 254], whereas in multiple myeloma high levels of IgG are frequently observed, which are followed by IgA and IgM [255]. Detection of abnormal patterns of immunoglobulin expression may be used for the diagnosis and to follow-up the response to the therapy [139, 253]. Monoclonal gammopathy can be analyzed by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) (Paragon SPE kit; Beckman Coulter, Inc.; Fullerton, CA), which allows for the electrophoretic separation of proteins. The protein migration pattern can be visualized, interpreted and quantitated at 600 nM with a Beckman APPRAISE densitometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.; Fullerton, CA). This instrument calculates the relative percentage of each protein fraction.

Free light chains of immunoglobulins, or Bence Jones protein if found in the urine

Free light immunoglobulin chains may be detected in the blood of patients with multiple myeloma [256-258]. This marker is termed Bence Jones protein if it is found in the urine [259-261]. Levels of free light immunoglobulin chains are monitored for the diagnosis of the disease and to determine the type of treatment for the patient [256-261]. The concentration of serum free light chains can be measured with a latex-enhanced immunoassay (FreeliteTM Human Kappa Free Kit, The Binding Site GmbH, Schwetzingen, Germany), which is carried out on a Dade-Behring nephelometer (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Free light chains in the urine and/or serum can be measured with a Hydragel Bence Jones kit (Sebia, Evry Cedex, France), which requires a Hydrasis instrument for the separation and characterization of free light chains (Sebia, Evry Cedex, France).

Inhibin

This marker is detected in the blood of patients with ovarian stromal cancer [262-264]. Inhibin is utilized to diagnose the malignancy and to monitor the reappearance of the tumor [262-264]. An Elisa kit is commercially available for the detection of serum inhibin (KAC1291 INHIBIN-EASIA; Biosource Europe S.A., Nivelles, Belgium).

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)

LDH is detected in the blood of patients with testicular cancer [236, 265, 266], other germ cell tumors [116], melanoma [101, 267, 268], neuroblastoma [269, 270] and lymphoma [271, 272]. This marker may be utilized for the prognosis, to follow-up the response to therapy and to monitor the recurrence of the tumor. However, high LDH levels may also be detected in noncancerous conditions, such as liver disease, hematological illnesses, muscle injury, heart attack and stroke [273]. For this reason, LDH is less useful for the diagnosis of the aforementioned malignancies than the markers AFP and HCG [273]. An Elisa kit is available for the detection of LDH (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE)

NSE is detected in the blood of patients with neuroendocrine tumors, such as neuroblastoma [274-276], carcinoid tumors [276-279] and small cell lung cancer [272, 275]. This marker is utilized for the follow-up of the response to therapy. High levels of this marker are also present in melanoma [274], pancreatic endocrine tumors [280, 281] and medullary thyroid cancer [282, 283]. NSE can be readily detected with an Elisa kit (Alpha Diagnostic Intl., Inc.; San Antonio, TX).

Nuclear Matrix protein 22 (NMP22)

This marker is detected in the urine of patients with bladder cancer and is utilized for the diagnosis of the disease [284-286]. NMP22 may be present in the urine of patients who had a recent chemotherapeutic intervention or underwent intravesical immunotherapy [287, 288]. An Elisa kit can be utilized for the detection of NMP22 (MyBioSource, Inc.; San Diego, CA).

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

PSA is detected in the blood of patients with prostate cancer and is utilized for the diagnosis, to follow-up the response to therapy and to monitor the clinical course of the disease [289-291]. This marker is also present in noncancerous conditions, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), infection of the prostate and inflammation of the prostate [292]. Serum PSA can be measured with an Elisa kit (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)

This marker is detected in the blood and is utilized for the diagnosis of prostate cancer [293-295], multiple myeloma [296] and lung cancer [297]. PAP can be detected in human serum with an Elisa kit (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

S-100

As anticipated, S-100 can be detected in tumor biopsies [17, 18, 100] and the blood of patients with melanoma [101]. This marker may be utilized for the diagnosis of melanoma if found in biopsies [17, 18, 100] and to monitor the clinical course of the disease if detected in the blood [101]. Serum S-100 can be visualized with an Elisa kit (Genorise; Glen Mills, PA).

Soluble mesothelin-related peptides (SMRP)

This marker is detected in the blood of patients with mesothelioma and may be utilized for the diagnosis and to monitor the reappearance of the malignancy [298-300]. An Elisa kit is commercially available for the detection of human SMRP in the serum (Cusabio; Wuhan, China).

Thyroglobulin

This marker is detected in the blood of patients with thyroid cancer and may be used for the diagnosis, to follow-up the response to therapy and to monitor the recurrence of the tumor [301-303]. However, thyroglobulin may also be present in noncancerous thyroid diseases [304]. Besides, some individuals may have antibodies against thyroglobulin, which interfere with the blood test [305, 306]. Serum thyroglobulin can be measured with an Elisa kit (Abcam; Cambridge, MA).

Antibodies against Tumor Markers in the Literature

Labome surveys literature to develop the Validated Antibody Database. Table 3 lists the most cited monoclonal antibodies against tumor markers and their suppliers among the over 60,000 formal publications that Labome has surveyed as of December 28, 2018.

Protein Top three suppliers
AFPMilliporeSigma A8452 (12), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-8399 (6), Abcam ab3980 (6)
ALKCell Signaling Technology 3333 (10), Invitrogen 35-4300 (8), Dako M7195 (4)
B2MAbcam ab75853 (9), BioLegend 316312 (2), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-13565 (2)
BRAFCell Signaling Technology 9427 (29), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-5284 (19), Abcam ab200535 (2)
CA 15-3/CA 27-29/MUC1Invitrogen MA5-11202 (59), Dako M0613 (33), Novus Biologicals NB120-22711 (12)
CA 125/MUC16Invitrogen MA5-11579 (2), Abcam ab134093 (2), Leica Biosystems NCL-L-CA125 (1)
calcitoninInvitrogen MA5-16325 (7), Bachem IHC6006 (4), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-57053 (1)
CD20Dako M0755 (85), Invitrogen MA5-13141 (51), BD Biosciences 647464 (38)
chromogranin AInvitrogen MA5-13096 (28), Dako M0869 (23), Leica Biosystems NCL-CHROM-430 (7)
EGFRCell Signaling Technology 4267 (130), Invitrogen MA1-12693 (45), Abcam ab52894 (38)
ERInvitrogen MA5-14501 (323), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-8002 (25), Cell Signaling Technology 8644 (14)
FGFR2Cell Signaling Technology 4574 (5), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-6930 (4), Abnova H00002263-M01 (4)
FGFR3Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-13121 (6), Cell Signaling Technology 4574 (5), Abcam ab155960 (2)
fibrinogen/FGAInvitrogen ABS 015-22-02 (3), Abcam ab92572 (2), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-166968 (1)
HE4Abcam ab200828 (1)
HER2Invitrogen MA5-14057 (117), Cell Signaling Technology 2165 (56), Ventana 790-2991 (12)
inhibinBio-Rad MCA951S (9), Dako M3609 (4), Abcam ab47720 (1)
KITBioLegend 313201 (19), Invitrogen 14-1172-85 (19), Cell Signaling Technology 3074 (18)
KRASSanta Cruz Biotechnology sc-30 (42), MilliporeSigma WH0003845M1 (9), Invitrogen MA1-012 (7)
LDHACell Signaling Technology 3582 (24), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-137243 (7), Abcam ab101562 (5)
NSEDako M0873 (21), Cell Signaling Technology 8171 (5), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-271384 (3)
NMP22Abcam ab109262 (3), BD Biosciences 610561 (2), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-56325 (1)
PAI-1Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-5297 (9), Cell Signaling Technology 11907 (5), Abcam ab125687 (3)
PIK3CACell Signaling Technology 4249 (70), Abcam ab40776 (2), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-293172 (1)
PGRInvitrogen MA5-14505 (140), Dako M3569 (46), Leica Biosystems NCL-ER-6F11 (24)
PSASanta Cruz Biotechnology sc-7316 (10), Cell Signaling Technology 5365 (5), Dako M0750 (3)
PAPInvitrogen MA5-13078 (2), Cell Signaling Technology 12861 (1), Leica Biosystems NCL-L-PAP (1)
S-100Invitrogen MA5-12969 (57), Abcam ab4066 (17), Biogenex MU058-5UC (3)
SMRPInvitrogen MA5-16378 (5), Abcam ab93620 (1), Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-271540 (1)
thyroglobulinLeica Biosystems PA0026 (4), Abcam ab156008 (1), Dako M0781 (1)
uPASanta Cruz Biotechnology sc-59727 (1), Abcam ab133563 (1), OriGene TA805243 (1)
Table 3. The most cited monoclonal antibodies against tumor markers and their number of citations with antibody applications of immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, and ELISA, among the over 60,000 publications Labome has surveyed for Validated Antibody Database. The most cited monoclonal antibody from each supplier is listed.
Future Directions

Novel tumor markers based on multi-gene and/or circulating cancer stem cells signatures are currently under characterization [307-318], such as CancerSEEK, which is based on PCR and eight protein biomarkers (CA-125, CA19-9, CEA, HGF, Myeloperoxidase, OPN, Prolactin, TIMP-1) [319]. In this respect, a particular emphasis has been placed on the characterization of micro-RNA (miRNA) molecules [317, 320-328]. The validation of these markers is still either at the early clinical trial stages or preclinical phase [307-318]. The upcoming generation of tumor markers holds the potential of developing so-called personalized medicine in oncological programs, in which a combination of drugs can be selected to optimize the treatment of a specific patient [307-318].

References
  1. Koepke J. Molecular marker test standardization. Cancer. 1992;69:1578-81 pubmed
  2. Andriole G, Crawford E, Grubb R, Buys S, Chia D, Church T, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310-9 pubmed publisher
  3. Cramer D, Bast R, Berg C, Diamandis E, Godwin A, Hartge P, et al. Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4:365-74 pubmed publisher
  4. Schroder F, Hugosson J, Roobol M, Tammela T, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320-8 pubmed publisher
  5. Buys S, Partridge E, Black A, Johnson C, Lamerato L, Isaacs C, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2011;305:2295-303 pubmed publisher
  6. Kittaneh M, Montero A, Gluck S. Molecular profiling for breast cancer: a comprehensive review. Biomark Cancer. 2013;5:61-70 pubmed publisher
  7. Jain S, Gradishar W. The application of Oncotype DX in early-stage lymph-node-positive disease. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014;16:360 pubmed publisher
  8. Harbeck N, Sotlar K, Wuerstlein R, Doisneau Sixou S. Molecular and protein markers for clinical decision making in breast cancer: today and tomorrow. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:434-44 pubmed publisher
  9. O Toole S, Selinger C, Millar E, Lum T, Beith J. Molecular assays in breast cancer pathology. Pathology. 2011;43:116-27 pubmed publisher
  10. Roh M. Molecular pathology of lung cancer: current status and future directions. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014;77:49-54 pubmed publisher
  11. Glitza I, Davies M. Genotyping of cutaneous melanoma. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3:27 pubmed
  12. Ofiara L, Navasakulpong A, Beaudoin S, Gonzalez A. Optimizing tissue sampling for the diagnosis, subtyping, and molecular analysis of lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2014;4:253 pubmed publisher
  13. Advani P, Crozier J, Perez E. HER2 testing and its predictive utility in anti-HER2 breast cancer therapy. Biomark Med. 2015;9:35-49 pubmed publisher
  14. Boughey J, McCall L, Ballman K, Mittendorf E, Ahrendt G, Wilke L, et al. Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2014;260:608-14; discussion 614-6 pubmed publisher
  15. Berrocal A, Cabañas L, Espinosa E, Fernández de Misa R, Martin Algarra S, Martínez Cedres J, et al. Melanoma: diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Consensus group recommendations. Adv Ther. 2014;31:945-60 pubmed publisher
  16. Sampsonas F, Ryan D, McPhillips D, Breen D. Molecular testing and personalized treatment of lung cancer. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2014;7:22-32 pubmed
  17. Scolyer R, Murali R, McCarthy S, Thompson J. Pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes from melanoma patients. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2008;25:100-11 pubmed
  18. Li L, Scolyer R, Ka V, McKinnon J, Shaw H, McCarthy S, et al. Pathologic review of negative sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients with regional recurrence: a clinicopathologic study of 1152 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1197-202 pubmed
  19. Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Brunner N, Janicke F, Meisner C, Mühlenweg B, et al. Cancer therapy trials employing level-of-evidence-1 disease forecast cancer biomarkers uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11:617-34 pubmed publisher
  20. Nolen B, Lokshin A. Biomarker testing for ovarian cancer: clinical utility of multiplex assays. Mol Diagn Ther. 2013;17:139-46 pubmed publisher
  21. Zhao Y, Ju Q, Li G. Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:593-598 pubmed
  22. Mauro M, Davis C, Zyczynski T, Khoury H. The role of observational studies in optimizing the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol. 2015;6:3-14 pubmed publisher
  23. Budman L, Kassouf W, Steinberg J. Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008;2:212-21 pubmed
  24. Donepudi M, Kondapalli K, Amos S, Venkanteshan P. Breast cancer statistics and markers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10:506-11 pubmed publisher
  25. Sagatys E, Zhang L. Clinical and laboratory prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Control. 2012;19:18-25 pubmed
  26. Kalager M, Bretthauer M. Improving cancer screening programs. Science. 2020;367:143-144 pubmed publisher
  27. Yarlagadda B, Kamatham V, Ritter A, Shahjehan F, Kasi P. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab in circulating tumor DNA ERBB2-amplified HER2-positive refractory cholangiocarcinoma. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2019;3:19 pubmed publisher
  28. Solin L, Gray R, Baehner F, Butler S, Hughes L, Yoshizawa C, et al. A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:701-10 pubmed publisher
  29. Ross J. Multigene classifiers, prognostic factors, and predictors of breast cancer clinical outcome. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:204-15 pubmed publisher
  30. Dobbe E, Gurney K, Kiekow S, Lafferty J, Kolesar J. Gene-expression assays: new tools to individualize treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:23-8 pubmed
  31. Bueno de Mesquita J, van Harten W, Retel V, van T Veer L, van Dam F, Karsenberg K, et al. Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:1079-1087 pubmed publisher
  32. Dikopf A, Wood K, Salgia R. A safety assessment of crizotinib in the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14:485-93 pubmed publisher
  33. Salgia R. Diagnostic challenges in non-small-cell lung cancer: an integrated medicine approach. Future Oncol. 2015;11:489-500 pubmed publisher
  34. Shackelford R, Vora M, Mayhall K, Cotelingam J. ALK-rearrangements and testing methods in non-small cell lung cancer: a review. Genes Cancer. 2014;5:1-14 pubmed
  35. Ou S. Crizotinib: a drug that crystallizes a unique molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12:151-62 pubmed publisher
  36. Rodig S, Shapiro G. Crizotinib, a small-molecule dual inhibitor of the c-Met and ALK receptor tyrosine kinases. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;11:1477-90 pubmed
  37. Dossett L, Kudchadkar R, Zager J. BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14:559-70 pubmed publisher
  38. Heppt M, Tietze J, Graf S, Berking C. Combination therapy of melanoma using kinase inhibitors. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27:134-40 pubmed publisher
  39. Reimers M, Zeestraten E, Kuppen P, Liefers G, Van De Velde C. Biomarkers in precision therapy in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013;1:166-83 pubmed publisher
  40. Kraus S, Nabiochtchikov I, Shapira S, Arber N. Recent advances in personalized colorectal cancer research. Cancer Lett. 2014;347:15-21 pubmed publisher
  41. Lee J, Koo B. The prognostic implication and potential role of BRAF mutation in the decision to perform elective neck dissection for thyroid cancer. Gland Surg. 2013;2:206-11 pubmed publisher
  42. Omur O, Baran Y. An update on molecular biology of thyroid cancers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;90:233-52 pubmed publisher
  43. Gonzalez D, Fearfield L, Nathan P, Taniere P, Wallace A, Brown E, et al. BRAF mutation testing algorithm for vemurafenib treatment in melanoma: recommendations from an expert panel. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:700-7 pubmed publisher
  44. Luke J, Hodi F. Ipilimumab, vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and trametinib: synergistic competitors in the clinical management of BRAF mutant malignant melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18:717-25 pubmed publisher
  45. Zambon A, Niculescu Duvaz D, Niculescu Duvaz I, Marais R, Springer C. BRAF as a therapeutic target: a patent review (2006 - 2012). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2013;23:155-64 pubmed publisher
  46. Dooley A, Gupta A, Bhattacharyya M, Middleton M. Intermittent dosing with vemurafenib in BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma: review of a case series. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014;6:262-6 pubmed publisher
  47. Mahipal A, Kothari N, Gupta S. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: coming of age. Cancer Control. 2014;21:74-9 pubmed
  48. Reid A, Vidal L, Shaw H, de Bono J. Dual inhibition of ErbB1 (EGFR/HER1) and ErbB2 (HER2/neu). Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:481-9 pubmed
  49. Pirker R. Epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies in nonsmall cell lung cancer: an update. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27:87-93 pubmed publisher
  50. Wu W, Chen Y. Re-Treatment with EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC Patients Who Developed Acquired Resistance. J Pers Med. 2014;4:297-310 pubmed publisher
  51. Wang Z. Selection of chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer is facilitated by new therapeutic strategies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:3833-42 pubmed
  52. Davis N, Sokolosky M, Stadelman K, Abrams S, Libra M, Candido S, et al. Deregulation of the EGFR/PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTORC1 pathway in breast cancer: possibilities for therapeutic intervention. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4603-50 pubmed
  53. Lluch A, Eroles P, Pérez Fidalgo J. Emerging EGFR antagonists for breast cancer. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2014;19:165-81 pubmed publisher
  54. Herold C, Anders C. New targets for triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2013;27:846-54 pubmed
  55. Barroso Sousa R, Santana I, Testa L, de Melo Gagliato D, Mano M. Biological therapies in breast cancer: common toxicities and management strategies. Breast. 2013;22:1009-18 pubmed publisher
  56. Safdari Y, Khalili M, Farajnia S, Asgharzadeh M, Yazdani Y, Sadeghi M. Recent advances in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma--a review. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:1195-202 pubmed publisher
  57. Bowles D, McDermott J, Jimeno A. Novel treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: preclinical identification and clinical investigation. Future Oncol. 2014;10:1065-80 pubmed publisher
  58. Seiwert T, Fayette J, Cupissol D, del Campo J, Clement P, Hitt R, et al. A randomized, phase II study of afatinib versus cetuximab in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1813-20 pubmed publisher
  59. Melosky B. Review of EGFR?TKIs in Metastatic NSCLC, Including Ongoing Trials. Front Oncol. 2014;4:244 pubmed publisher
  60. Fang S, Wang Z. EGFR mutations as a prognostic and predictive marker in non-small-cell lung cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:1595-611 pubmed publisher
  61. Tian W, Ding W, Kim S, Xu X, Pan M, Chen S. Efficacy and safety profile of combining agents against epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelium growth factor receptor with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:415-22 pubmed publisher
  62. Desai M, Saroya B, Lockhart A. Investigational therapies targeting the ErbB (EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4) family in GI cancers. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2013;22:341-56 pubmed publisher
  63. Centuori S, Martinez J. Differential regulation of EGFR-MAPK signaling by deoxycholic acid (DCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in colon cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:2367-80 pubmed publisher
  64. Grady W, Pritchard C. Molecular alterations and biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Toxicol Pathol. 2014;42:124-39 pubmed publisher
  65. Yarom N, Jonker D. The role of the epidermal growth factor receptor in the mechanism and treatment of colorectal cancer. Discov Med. 2011;11:95-105 pubmed
  66. FDA approves first targeted therapy for metastatic bladder cancer. Available from: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm635906.htm
  67. Schroeder R, STEVENS C, Sridhar J. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors of ErbB2/HER2/Neu in the treatment of aggressive breast cancer. Molecules. 2014;19:15196-212 pubmed publisher
  68. Stenehjem D, Yoo M, Unni S, Singhal M, Bauer H, Saverno K, et al. Assessment of HER2 testing patterns, HER2+ disease, and the utilization of HER2-directed therapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2014;6:169-77 pubmed publisher
  69. Sheffield B, Garratt J, Kalloger S, Li Chang H, Torlakovic E, Gilks C, et al. HER2/neu testing in gastric cancer by immunohistochemistry: assessment of interlaboratory variation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:1495-502 pubmed publisher
  70. Jørgensen J. Role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in gastric cancer: biological and pharmacological aspects. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:4526-35 pubmed publisher
  71. de Mello R, Marques A, Araujo A. HER2 therapies and gastric cancer: a step forward. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6165-9 pubmed publisher
  72. Nagaraja V, Eslick G. Advances in biomarkers for esophageal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13:1169-80 pubmed publisher
  73. Hong T, Wo J, Kwak E. Targeted therapies with chemoradiation in esophageal cancer: development and future directions. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013;23:31-7 pubmed publisher
  74. Pazo Cid R, Anton A. Advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: current and future targeted therapies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;85:350-62 pubmed publisher
  75. Price T, Shapiro J, Segelov E, Karapetis C, Pavlakis N, Van Cutsem E, et al. Management of advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;6:199-208; quiz 209 pubmed publisher
  76. Fucito A, Lucchetti C, Giordano A, Romano G. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in breast cancer: what are the perspectives for clinical practice?. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:565-75 pubmed
  77. Blok E, Derks M, van der Hoeven J, van de Velde C, Kroep J. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer: current and future evidence. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:271-6 pubmed publisher
  78. Liedtke C, Rody A. New treatment strategies for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:77-84 pubmed publisher
  79. Lambertini M, Ginsburg E, Partridge A. Update on fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer and ovarian cancer therapy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:98-107 pubmed publisher
  80. van Meurs H, van Lonkhuijzen L, Limpens J, van der Velden J, Buist M. Hormone therapy in ovarian granulosa cell tumors: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:196-205 pubmed publisher
  81. Ribeiro J, Freiman R. Estrogen signaling crosstalk: Implications for endocrine resistance in ovarian cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;143:160-73 pubmed publisher
  82. Sommeijer D, Sjoquist K, Friedlander M. Hormonal treatment in recurrent and metastatic gynaecological cancers: a review of the current literature. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15:541-8 pubmed publisher
  83. van Kruchten M, Hospers G, Glaudemans A, Hollema H, Arts H, Reyners A. Positron emission tomography imaging of oestrogen receptor-expression in endometrial stromal sarcoma supports oestrogen receptor-targeted therapy: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3850-5 pubmed publisher
  84. Chew I, Oliva E. Endometrial stromal sarcomas: a review of potential prognostic factors. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17:113-21 pubmed publisher
  85. Hapangama D, Kamal A, Bulmer J. Estrogen receptor β: the guardian of the endometrium. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:174-93 pubmed publisher
  86. Rizner T. Estrogen biosynthesis, phase I and phase II metabolism, and action in endometrial cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;381:124-39 pubmed publisher
  87. Kim J, Kurita T, Bulun S. Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer. Endocr Rev. 2013;34:130-62 pubmed publisher
  88. Jones D, Caracciolo J, Hodul P, Strosberg J, Coppola D, Bui M. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome: report of 2 cases with KIT exon 11 mutation. Cancer Control. 2015;22:102-8 pubmed
  89. Postow M, Hamid O, Carvajal R. Mucosal melanoma: pathogenesis, clinical behavior, and management. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:441-8 pubmed publisher
  90. Westwood M, van Asselt T, Ramaekers B, Whiting P, Joore M, Armstrong N, et al. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1-132 pubmed publisher
  91. Kothari N, Schell M, Teer J, Yeatman T, Shibata D, Kim R. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis of colorectal cancer samples by standard testing and next-generation sequencing. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67:764-7 pubmed
  92. Korpanty G, Graham D, Vincent M, Leighl N. Biomarkers That Currently Affect Clinical Practice in Lung Cancer: EGFR, ALK, MET, ROS-1, and KRAS. Front Oncol. 2014;4:204 pubmed publisher
  93. Timar J. The clinical relevance of KRAS gene mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2014;26:138-44 pubmed publisher
  94. Wu K, Huang R, House L, Cho W. Next-generation sequencing for lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2013;9:1323-36 pubmed publisher
  95. Lien K, Berry S, Ko Y, Chan K. The use of EGFR inhibitors in colorectal cancer: is it clinically efficacious and cost-effective?. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15:81-100 pubmed publisher
  96. Singh N, Jindal A, Behera D. Erlotinib usage after prior treatment with gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A clinical perspective and review of published literature. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:858-64 pubmed publisher
  97. Nguyen K, Neal J, Wakelee H. Review of the current targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:576-87 pubmed publisher
  98. Ramalingam S, Jänne P, Mok T, O Byrne K, Boyer M, Von Pawel J, et al. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1009): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1369-78 pubmed publisher
  99. Gerber D, Gandhi L, Costa D. Management and future directions in non-small cell lung cancer with known activating mutations. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014;:e353-65 pubmed publisher
  100. Ohsie S, Sarantopoulos G, Cochran A, Binder S. Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:433-44 pubmed publisher
  101. Perrotta R, Bevelacqua Y, Malaguarnera G, Paladina I, Giordano M, Malaguarnera M. Serum markers of cutaneous melanoma. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2010;2:1115-22 pubmed
  102. Tang L, Han X. The urokinase plasminogen activator system in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013;67:179-82 pubmed publisher
  103. Harbeck N, Schmitt M, Paepke S, Allgayer H, Kates R. Tumor-associated proteolytic factors uPA and PAI-1: critical appraisal of their clinical relevance in breast cancer and their integration into decision-support algorithms. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2007;44:179-201 pubmed
  104. Karagiannis P, Fittall M, Karagiannis S. Evaluating biomarkers in melanoma. Front Oncol. 2014;4:383 pubmed publisher
  105. Canfield S, Kibel A, Kemeter M, Febbo P, Lawrence H, Moul J. A guide for clinicians in the evaluation of emerging molecular diagnostics for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2014;16:172-80 pubmed
  106. MALEK S. Molecular biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;792:193-214 pubmed publisher
  107. Nolen B, Lokshin A. Multianalyte assay systems in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2012;6:131-138 pubmed
  108. Zhang Z, Chan D. The road from discovery to clinical diagnostics: lessons learned from the first FDA-cleared in vitro diagnostic multivariate index assay of proteomic biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2995-9 pubmed publisher
  109. Fung E. A recipe for proteomics diagnostic test development: the OVA1 test, from biomarker discovery to FDA clearance. Clin Chem. 2010;56:327-9 pubmed publisher
  110. Rich N, Singal A. Hepatocellular carcinoma tumour markers: current role and expectations. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:843-53 pubmed publisher
  111. Flores A, Marrero J. Emerging trends in hepatocellular carcinoma: focus on diagnosis and therapeutics. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2014;8:71-6 pubmed publisher
  112. Zhu K, Dai Z, Zhou J. Biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma: progression in early diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy. Biomark Res. 2013;1:10 pubmed publisher
  113. Patel P, Balise R, Srinivas S. Variations in normal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels in patients with testicular cancer on surveillance. Onkologie. 2012;35:588-91 pubmed publisher
  114. Bonet A, Muñoz Delgado E, Vico F, Ruiz J, Chapado M. Analysis of clinical-pathologic variables, staging and prognostic groups, and therapeutic results of 106 germ-cell testicular tumors. Arch Esp Urol. 2011;64:972-80 pubmed
  115. Patterson D, Rustin G. Controversies in the management of germ cell tumours of the ovary. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006;18:500-6 pubmed
  116. von Eyben F. Laboratory markers and germ cell tumors. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2003;40:377-427 pubmed
  117. Pemmaraju N, Cortes J. Chronic myeloid leukemia in adolescents and young adults: patient characteristics, outcomes and review of the literature. Acta Haematol. 2014;132:298-306 pubmed publisher
  118. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2014 update on diagnosis, monitoring, and management. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:547-56 pubmed publisher
  119. Kantarjian H, Talpaz M, Gutterman J. Chronic myelogenous leukemia--past, present, and future. Hematol Pathol. 1988;2:91-120 pubmed
  120. Kaneko Y, Maseki N, Sakurai M, Shibuya A, Shinohara T, Fujimoto T, et al. Chromosome pattern in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute leukemia associated with neurofibromatosis. Leukemia. 1989;3:36-41 pubmed
  121. Brunning R. Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemia. Hum Pathol. 1980;11:307-9 pubmed
  122. Sessarego M, Pasquali F, Bianchi Scarra G, Ajmar F. Masked Philadelphia chromosome caused by translocation (9;11;22). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1983;8:319-23 pubmed
  123. Nowell P, Emanuel B, Finan J, Erikson J, Croce C. Chromosome rearrangements in oncogenesis. Microbiol Sci. 1984;1:223-8 pubmed
  124. Rubin A, Davis S. The role of the lymphocyte in producing the clinical manifestations of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Med Clin North Am. 1973;57:463-78 pubmed
  125. Huguley C. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Treat Rev. 1977;4:261-73 pubmed
  126. Shanshal M, Haddad R. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dis Mon. 2012;58:153-67 pubmed publisher
  127. Bazargan A, Tam C, Keating M. Predicting survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12:393-403 pubmed publisher
  128. Kay N, Shanafelt T. Prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2007;2:49-55 pubmed publisher
  129. Bataille R, Annweiler C, Beauchet O. Multiple myeloma international staging system: "staging" or simply "aging" system?. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013;13:635-7 pubmed publisher
  130. Bergsagel P. Individualizing therapy using molecular markers in multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2007;7 Suppl 4:S170-4 pubmed
  131. Lauta V. A review of the cytokine network in multiple myeloma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Cancer. 2003;97:2440-52 pubmed
  132. Harousseau J. Management of multiple myeloma. Rev Clin Exp Hematol. 2002;6:253-75 pubmed
  133. Al Sobhi E, Osoba A, Karar A, Zuraiki A. Multiple myeloma of the central nervous system: a clinicopathological review. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15:1570-9 pubmed
  134. Alsobhi E, Hashim I, Abdelaal M, Aljifri A, Alshamy A. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid beta-2 microglobulin as a tumor marker in a patient with myeloma of the central nervous system. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:128-30 pubmed
  135. Yoo C, Yoon D, Suh C. Serum beta-2 microglobulin in malignant lymphomas: an old but powerful prognostic factor. Blood Res. 2014;49:148-53 pubmed publisher
  136. Sibon D, Fournier M, Briere J, Lamant L, Haioun C, Coiffier B, et al. Long-term outcome of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma treated within the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte trials. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3939-46 pubmed publisher
  137. Mazloom A, Medeiros L, McLaughlin P, Reed V, Cabanillas F, Fayad L, et al. Marginal zone lymphomas: factors that affect the final outcome. Cancer. 2010;116:4291-8 pubmed publisher
  138. Vitolo U, Ferreri A, Montoto S. Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma-Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;67:172-85 pubmed publisher
  139. Gertz M. Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2013;88:703-11 pubmed publisher
  140. Ghobrial I. Are you sure this is Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia?. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:586-94 pubmed publisher
  141. Vijay A, Gertz M. Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Blood. 2007;109:5096-103 pubmed
  142. Winter J. Prognostic markers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Keys to the underlying biology. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2007;2:235-41 pubmed publisher
  143. Yegane S, Revanli M, Taneli F. The role of beta2 microglobulin levels in monitoring chronic hepatitis B. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004;203:53-7 pubmed
  144. Malaguarnera M, Restuccia S, Di Fazio I, Zoccolo A, Trovato B, Pistone G. Serum beta2-microglobulin in chronic hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:762-6 pubmed
  145. Miyata T, Jadoul M, Kurokawa K, van Ypersele de Strihou C. Beta-2 microglobulin in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1723-35 pubmed
  146. Lessing J. Bladder cancer: early diagnosis and evaluation of biologic potential. A review of newer methods. J Urol. 1978;120:1-5 pubmed
  147. Lange P, Limas C. Molecular markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of bladder cancer. Urology. 1984;23:46-54 pubmed
  148. Huben R. Tumor markers in bladder cancer. Urology. 1984;23:10-4 pubmed
  149. Cheng L, Davison D, Adams J, Lopez Beltran A, Wang L, Montironi R, et al. Biomarkers in bladder cancer: translational and clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;89:73-111 pubmed publisher
  150. O BRIEN P, Gozzo J, Monaco A. Urinary proteins as biological markers: bladder cancer diagnosis versus urinary tract infection. J Urol. 1980;124:802-3 pubmed
  151. Huland E, Huland H, Meier T, Baricordi O, Fradet Y, Grossman H, et al. Comparison of 15 monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens of transitional cell carcinoma of the human bladder. J Urol. 1991;146:1631-6 pubmed
  152. Khatcheressian J, Hurley P, Bantug E, Esserman L, Grunfeld E, Halberg F, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:961-5 pubmed publisher
  153. Marić P, Ozretic P, Levanat S, Oreskovic S, Antunac K, Beketic Oreskovic L. Tumor markers in breast cancer--evaluation of their clinical usefulness. Coll Antropol. 2011;35:241-7 pubmed
  154. Brooks M. Breast cancer screening and biomarkers. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;472:307-21 pubmed publisher
  155. Farghaly S. Tumor markers in gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34:65-72 pubmed
  156. Wang X, Wu Y, Wang M, Wang Y. CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199 in malignant pleural effusions predict the cause. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:363-8 pubmed
  157. Shu J, Li C, Liu Y, Yan X, Xu X, Huang X, et al. Comparison of serum tumor associated material (TAM) with conventional biomarkers in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:2399-403 pubmed
  158. Walach N, Gur Y. Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase, CA15-3, CA125, and CEA in cancer patients. Tumori. 1998;84:360-3 pubmed
  159. Gebauer G, Müller Ruchholtz W. Tumor marker concentrations in normal and malignant tissues of colorectal cancer patients and their prognostic relevance. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:2939-42 pubmed
  160. Mondal H, Roy H, Mondal P, Saha M, Basu N. Usefulness of serum CA-15.3 in the management of benign breast lesion. J Indian Med Assoc. 2012;110:242-4 pubmed
  161. Colomer R, Ruibal A, Genolla J, Rubio D, del Campo J, Bodi R, et al. Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1989;13:123-33 pubmed
  162. Matalliotakis I, Goumenou A, Mulayim N, Karkavitsas N, Koumantakis E. High concentrations of the CA-125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 in the peritoneal fluid between patients with and without endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271:40-5 pubmed
  163. Panidis D, Vlassis G, Matalliotakis J, Skiadopoulos S, Kalogeropoulos A. Serum levels of the oncofetal antigens CA-125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 in patients with endometriosis. J Endocrinol Invest. 1988;11:801-4 pubmed
  164. Swiderska M, Choromańska B, Dąbrowska E, Konarzewska Duchnowska E, Choromańska K, Szczurko G, et al. The diagnostics of colorectal cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014;18:1-6 pubmed publisher
  165. Galli C, Basso D, Plebani M. CA 19-9: handle with care. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:1369-83 pubmed publisher
  166. Ballehaninna U, Chamberlain R. Serum CA 19-9 as a Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer-A Comprehensive Review. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2011;2:88-100 pubmed publisher
  167. Andren Sandberg A. CA 50 and CA 19-9 in serum as tumor markers for pancreatic cancer: a review of the literature. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1989;549:75-81 pubmed
  168. Basturk O, Weigelt B, Adsay V, Benhamida J, Askan G, Wang L, et al. Sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm of the pancreas - a proposed new entity. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:456-467 pubmed publisher
  169. Wang Q, Ji Z, Chen Z, Li H, Fan H, Fan X, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a good prognostic biomarker in patients with bladder cancer. Int J Surg. 2015;15:113-6 pubmed publisher
  170. Washino S, Hirai M, Matsuzaki A, Kobayashi Y. Clinical usefulness of CEA, CA19-9, and CYFRA 21-1 as tumor markers for urothelial bladder carcinoma. Urol Int. 2011;87:420-8 pubmed publisher
  171. López Vélez M, Martinez Martinez F. Study of serum antioxidant capacity and relation with CA 19-9 and PSA in patients with gastrointestinal tract and prostate tumors. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:1121-1127 pubmed publisher
  172. Kato K, Taniguchi M, Kawakami T, Nagase A, Matsuda M, Onodea K, et al. Gastric Cancer with a Very High Serum CA 19-9 Level. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011;5:258-61 pubmed publisher
  173. Shimomura C, Eguchi K, Kawakami A, Migita K, Nakao H, Otsubo T, et al. Elevation of a tumor associated antigen CA 19-9 levels in patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 1989;16:1410-5 pubmed
  174. Parra J, Kaplan S, Barkin J. Elevated CA 19-9 caused by Hashimoto's thyroiditis: review of the benign causes of increased CA 19-9 level. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:694-5 pubmed
  175. Safi F, Roscher R, Bittner R, Schenkluhn B, Dopfer H, Beger H. High sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9 for pancreatic carcinoma in comparison to chronic pancreatitis. Serological and immunohistochemical findings. Pancreas. 1987;2:398-403 pubmed
  176. Ravi K, Chari S, Vege S, Sandborn W, Smyrk T, Loftus E. Inflammatory bowel disease in the setting of autoimmune pancreatitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1326-30 pubmed publisher
  177. Engle D, Tiriac H, Rivera K, Pommier A, Whalen S, Oni T, et al. The glycan CA19-9 promotes pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in mice. Science. 2019;364:1156-1162 pubmed publisher
  178. Ramsey S, Henry N, Gralow J, Mirick D, Barlow W, Etzioni R, et al. Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:149-55 pubmed publisher
  179. Clinton S, Beason K, Bryant S, Johnson J, Jackson M, Wilson C, et al. A comparative study of four serological tumor markers for the detection of breast cancer. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;39:408-14 pubmed
  180. Bast R, Ravdin P, Hayes D, Bates S, Fritsche H, Jessup J, et al. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865-78 pubmed
  181. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5287-312 pubmed
  182. Molina R, Barak V, Van Dalen A, Duffy M, Einarsson R, Gion M, et al. Tumor markers in breast cancer- European Group on Tumor Markers recommendations. Tumour Biol. 2005;26:281-93 pubmed
  183. Sarandakou A, Protonotariou E, Rizos D. Tumor markers in biological fluids associated with pregnancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2007;44:151-78 pubmed
  184. Kurian S, Khan M, Grant M. CA 27-29 in patients with breast cancer with pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008;8:538-40 pubmed publisher
  185. Jeschke U, Wiest I, Schumacher A, Kupka M, Rack B, Stahn R, et al. Determination of MUC1 in sera of ovarian cancer patients and in sera of patients with benign changes of the ovaries with CA15-3, CA27.29, and PankoMab. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:2185-9 pubmed
  186. Perkins G, Slater E, Sanders G, Prichard J. Serum tumor markers. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:1075-82 pubmed
  187. Yin B, Lloyd K. Molecular cloning of the CA125 ovarian cancer antigen: identification as a new mucin, MUC16. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27371-5 pubmed
  188. Yin B, Dnistrian A, Lloyd K. Ovarian cancer antigen CA125 is encoded by the MUC16 mucin gene. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:737-40 pubmed
  189. Musto A, Grassetto G, Marzola M, Rampin L, Chondrogiannis S, Maffione A, et al. Management of epithelial ovarian cancer from diagnosis to restaging: an overview of the role of imaging techniques with particular regard to the contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:588-97 pubmed publisher
  190. Diaz Padilla I, Razak A, Minig L, Bernardini M, María Del Campo J. Prognostic and predictive value of CA-125 in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: potentials and pitfalls. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14:15-20 pubmed
  191. Powless C, Aletti G, Bakkum Gamez J, Cliby W. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:536-40 pubmed publisher
  192. Togo Peraza J, Gómez Pinto J, Togo Osuna L, Montoya Romero J. [Primary carcinoma of the peritoneum. Case report and literature review]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014;82:344-9 pubmed
  193. Liu Q, Lin J, Shi Q, Wu B, Ma H, Sun G. Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a clinical and pathological study. Pathol Oncol Res. 2011;17:713-9 pubmed publisher
  194. Rettenmaier N, Rettenmaier C, Wojciechowski T, Abaid L, Brown J, Micha J, et al. The utility and cost of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a 16-year institutional review. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1657-62 pubmed publisher
  195. Dao M, Alwan L, Gray H, Tamimi H, Goff B, Liao J. Recurrence patterns after extended treatment with bevacizumab for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130:295-9 pubmed publisher
  196. Esselen K, Rodriguez N, Growdon W, Krasner C, Horowitz N, Campos S. Patterns of recurrence in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:51-4 pubmed publisher
  197. Shamshirsaz A, Buekers T, Degeest K, Bender D, Zamba G, Goodheart M. A single-institution evaluation of factors important in fallopian tube carcinoma recurrence and survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:1232-40 pubmed publisher
  198. Terzakis E, Androutsopoulos G, Adonakis G, Zygouris D, Grigoriadis C, Decavalas G. Fallopian tube primary cancer: report of five cases and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32:95-8 pubmed
  199. Riska A, Leminen A. Updating on primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:1419-26 pubmed
  200. Sikaris K. CA125--a test with a change of heart. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:634-40 pubmed publisher
  201. Turgut O, Tandogan I, Yilmaz M, Gul I, Gurlek A. CA125 levels among patients with advanced heart failure: an emerging independent predictor for survival. Int J Cardiol. 2010;145:71 pubmed publisher
  202. Matias Guiu X, De Lellis R. Medullary thyroid carcinoma: a 25-year perspective. Endocr Pathol. 2014;25:21-9 pubmed publisher
  203. Roy M, Chen H, Sippel R. Current understanding and management of medullary thyroid cancer. Oncologist. 2013;18:1093-100 pubmed publisher
  204. Gac A, Parienti J, Chantepie S, Fradin S, Le Coutour X, Leclercq R, et al. Dynamics of procalcitonin and bacteremia in neutropenic adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2011;35:1294-6 pubmed publisher
  205. Koivula I, Juutilainen A. Procalcitonin is a useful marker of infection in neutropenia. Leuk Res. 2011;35:1288-9 pubmed publisher
  206. Cvijovic G, Micic D, Kendereski A, Zoric S, Sumarac Dumanovic M, Tatic S, et al. Ectopic calcitonin secretion in a woman with large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma. Hormones (Athens). 2013;12:584-90 pubmed
  207. Kelley M, Becker K, Rushin J, Venzon D, Phelps R, Ihde D, et al. Calcitonin elevation in small cell lung cancer without ectopic production. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:183-90 pubmed
  208. Sorbye H. Recurrence patterns after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;203:243-52 pubmed publisher
  209. Young P, Womeldorph C, Johnson E, Maykel J, Brücher B, Stojadinovic A, et al. Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges. J Cancer. 2014;5:262-71 pubmed publisher
  210. Strambu V, Garofil D, Pop F, Radu P, Bratucu M, Popa F. Translating clinical research of Molecular Biology into a personalized, multidisciplinary approach of colorectal cancer patients. J Med Life. 2014;7:17-26 pubmed
  211. Fahy B. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:738-46 pubmed publisher
  212. Wallin U, Rothenberger D, Lowry A, Luepker R, Mellgren A. CEA - a predictor for pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:859-68 pubmed publisher
  213. Paoletti C, Hayes D. Molecular testing in breast cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:95-110 pubmed publisher
  214. John Baptiste A, Wu W, Rochon P, Anderson G, Bell C. A systematic review and methodological evaluation of published cost-effectiveness analyses of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62614 pubmed publisher
  215. Dorreen M. Role of biological markers and probes in lung carcinomas. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1986;22:137-46 pubmed
  216. Greiner J, Guadagni F, Goldstein D, Borden E, Ritts R, Witt P, et al. Evidence for the elevation of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 levels in patients administered interferons. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4155-63 pubmed
  217. Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood R. The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem. 1998;35 ( Pt 1):99-103 pubmed
  218. Liu F, Du F, Chen X. Multiple tumor marker protein chip detection system in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:333 pubmed publisher
  219. Kurzrock R, Atkins J, Wheler J, Fu S, Naing A, Busaidy N, et al. Tumor marker and measurement fluctuations may not reflect treatment efficacy in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma on long-term RET inhibitor therapy. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2256-61 pubmed publisher
  220. Lee E, Yang J, Lee K, Oh S, Suh Y, Kong S, et al. The value of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for the early detection of gastric cancer recurrence after curative resection. J Gastric Cancer. 2014;14:221-8 pubmed publisher
  221. Tarle M, Rados N. Investigation on serum neurone-specific enolase in prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring: comparative study of a multiple tumor marker assay. Prostate. 1991;19:23-33 pubmed
  222. Guinan P, Ablin R, Dubin A, Nourkayhan S, Bush I. Carcinoembryonic antigen test in renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1975;5:185-7 pubmed
  223. Valet G, Ormerod M, Warnecke H, Benker G, Ruhenstroth Bauer G. Sensitive three-parameter flow-cytometric detection of abnormal cells in human cervical cancers: a pilot study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1981;102:177-84 pubmed
  224. Alberico S, Facca M, Millo R, Radillo L, Mandruzzato G. Tumoral markers (CA 125--CEA) in the screening of ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1988;9:485-9 pubmed
  225. Inai H, Shimazui T, Yamamoto T, Yamauchi A, Uchida K, Takeshima H, et al. [A case of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder with high serum level of CEA and CA19-9]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001;47:583-6 pubmed
  226. Bonavida B. Postulated mechanisms of resistance of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma to rituximab treatment regimens: strategies to overcome resistance. Semin Oncol. 2014;41:667-77 pubmed publisher
  227. Griffin M, Morley N. Rituximab in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a critical evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:803-11 pubmed publisher
  228. D Herbomez M, Do Cao C, Vezzosi D, Borzon Chasot F, Baudin E. Chromogranin A assay in clinical practice. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2010;71:274-80 pubmed publisher
  229. Ferrari L, Seregni E, Bajetta E, Martinetti A, Bombardieri E. The biological characteristics of chromogranin A and its role as a circulating marker in neuroendocrine tumours. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:3415-27 pubmed
  230. Syversen U, Heide L, Waldum H. [Chromogranin A in blood--a useful tumor marker]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997;117:3810-1 pubmed
  231. Ferrari L, Seregni E, Martinetti A, van Graafeiland B, Nerini Molteni S, Botti C, et al. Chromogranin A measurement in neuroendocrine tumors. Int J Biol Markers. 1998;13:3-9 pubmed
  232. Conteduca V, Burgio S, Menna C, Carretta E, Rossi L, Bianchi E, et al. Chromogranin A is a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer patients treated with enzalutamide. Prostate. 2014;74:1691-6 pubmed publisher
  233. Huang W, Li L, Pang J, Ruan X, Sun Q, Yang W, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients with asymptomatic hematuria and negative urine cytology. Neoplasma. 2012;59:355-60 pubmed publisher
  234. Ding T, Wang Y, Cao Y, Yang L. Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for prediction of residual tumor after transurethral resection of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2011;77:855-9 pubmed publisher
  235. Shaaban A, Rezvani M, Elsayes K, Baskin H, Mourad A, Foster B, et al. Ovarian malignant germ cell tumors: cellular classification and clinical and imaging features. Radiographics. 2014;34:777-801 pubmed publisher
  236. Aggarwal P, Kehoe S. Serum tumour markers in gynaecological cancers. Maturitas. 2010;67:46-53 pubmed publisher
  237. Goyal L, Kaur S, Kawatra K. Malignant mixed germ cell tumour of ovary--an unusual combination and review of literature. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:91 pubmed publisher
  238. Faber K, Carlos M, Cortessis V, Daneshmand S. Validation of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results TNM staging for testicular germ cell tumor. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:1341-6 pubmed publisher
  239. Milose J, Filson C, Weizer A, Hafez K, Montgomery J. Role of biochemical markers in testicular cancer: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. Open Access J Urol. 2011;4:1-8 pubmed publisher
  240. Zhang X, Shi H, Chen X. Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor after induced abortion with previous broad choriocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:8245-50 pubmed
  241. Jindrak K, Bochetto J, Alpert L. Primary gastric choriocarcinoma: case report with review of world literature. Hum Pathol. 1976;7:595-604 pubmed
  242. Kathuria S, Jablokow V. Primary choriocarcinoma of mediastinum with immunohistochemical study and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol. 1987;34:39-42 pubmed
  243. . A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:973-983 pubmed publisher
  244. Szturmowicz M, Rudziński P, Kacprzak A, Langfort R, Bestry I, Broniarek Samson B, et al. Prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokeratin 19 fragments (Cyfra 21-1) but not carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in surgically treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2014;82:422-9 pubmed publisher
  245. He A, Liu T, Dong Z, Ren Z, Hou J, Li M, et al. A novel immunoassay for the quantization of CYFRA 21-1 in human serum. J Clin Lab Anal. 2013;27:277-83 pubmed publisher
  246. Zaher A, Sheridan T. Tumor markers in the detection of recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a brief review. Acta Cytol. 2001;45:575-81 pubmed
  247. Tsihlias J, Grossman H. The utility of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products in superficial bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:39-46 pubmed
  248. Ramakumar S, Bhuiyan J, Besse J, Roberts S, Wollan P, Blute M, et al. Comparison of screening methods in the detection of bladder cancer. J Urol. 1999;161:388-94 pubmed
  249. Hellstrom I, Raycraft J, Hayden Ledbetter M, Ledbetter J, Schummer M, McIntosh M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3695-700 pubmed
  250. Vallius T, Hynninen J, Auranen A, Carpen O, Matomäki J, Oksa S, et al. Serum HE4 and CA125 as predictors of response and outcome during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:12389-95 pubmed publisher
  251. Greenberg A, Rajkumar S, Vachon C. Familial monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: epidemiology, risk factors, and biological characteristics. Blood. 2012;119:5359-66 pubmed publisher
  252. Kyle R, Therneau T, Rajkumar S, Offord J, Larson D, Plevak M, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:564-9 pubmed
  253. Sahin I, Leblebjian H, Treon S, Ghobrial I. Waldenström macroglobulinemia: from biology to treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2014;7:157-68 pubmed publisher
  254. Kapoor P, Paludo J, Vallumsetla N, Greipp P. Waldenström macroglobulinemia: What a hematologist needs to know. Blood Rev. 2015;29:301-19 pubmed publisher
  255. van de Donk N, Palumbo A, Johnsen H, Engelhardt M, Gay F, Gregersen H, et al. The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network. Haematologica. 2014;99:984-96 pubmed publisher
  256. Graziani M, Merlini G. Serum free light chain analysis in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and related conditions. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014;14:55-66 pubmed publisher
  257. Jenner E. Serum free light chains in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;427:15-20 pubmed publisher
  258. Cho S, You E, Lee W, Lee J, Lee H, Yoon H, et al. Laboratory tools for oligo-secretory myeloma diagnosis: capillary electrophoresis versus free light chain assay. Clin Lab. 2013;59:445-8 pubmed
  259. Bernier G, Putnam F. MONOMER--DIMER FORMS OF BENCE JONES PROTEINS. Nature. 1963;200:223-5 pubmed
  260. Kanoh T, Nishimura K, Izumi T, Ohshima S. [Two Bence Jones proteins of different immunologic types in multiple myeloma]. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi. 1988;77:1890-1 pubmed
  261. Kosaka M, Iishi Y, Okagawa K, Saito S, Sugihara J, Muto Y. Tetramer Bence Jones protein in the immunoproliferative diseases. Angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy, primary amyloidosis, and multiple myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;91:639-46 pubmed
  262. Roth L, Czernobilsky B. Perspectives on pure ovarian stromal neoplasms and tumor-like proliferations of the ovarian stroma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:e15-33 pubmed publisher
  263. Robertson D, Burger H, Fuller P. Inhibin/activin and ovarian cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:35-49 pubmed
  264. Burger H, Fuller P, Chu S, Mamers P, Drummond A, Susil B, et al. The inhibins and ovarian cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;180:145-8 pubmed
  265. Lin J, Qin J, Sangvatanakul V. Human epididymis protein 4 for differential diagnosis between benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:81-5 pubmed publisher
  266. Barlow L, Badalato G, McKiernan J. Serum tumor markers in the evaluation of male germ cell tumors. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:610-7 pubmed publisher
  267. Torabian S, Kashani Sabet M. Biomarkers for melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17:167-71 pubmed
  268. Linette G, Carlson J, Slominski A, Mihm M, Ross J. Biomarkers in melanoma: stage III and IV disease. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005;5:65-74 pubmed
  269. Riley R, Heney D, Jones D, Sutton A, Lambert P, Abrams K, et al. A systematic review of molecular and biological tumor markers in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4-12 pubmed
  270. Mora J, Gerald W, Cheung N. Evolving significance of prognostic markers associated with new treatment strategies in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2003;197:119-24 pubmed
  271. Hsu P, Yang T, Sheikh Fayyaz S, Brody J, Bandovic J, Roy S, et al. Mantle cell lymphoma with in situ or mantle zone growth pattern: a study of five cases and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1042-50 pubmed
  272. Rashidi A, Fisher S. Primary adrenal lymphoma: a systematic review. Ann Hematol. 2013;92:1583-93 pubmed publisher
  273. Oladipo O, Ajala M, Afonja O. The lactate dehydrogenases in malignant and non-malignant diseases. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2002;9:1-6 pubmed
  274. Cooper E. Neuron-specific enolase. Int J Biol Markers. 1994;9:205-10 pubmed
  275. Miale T, Kirpekar K. Neuroblastoma stage IV-S. Med Oncol. 1994;11:89-100 pubmed
  276. Wick M. Immunohistology of neuroendocrine and neuroectodermal tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000;17:194-203 pubmed
  277. Todoroki T, Sano T, Yamada S, Hirahara N, Toda N, Tsukada K, et al. Clear cell carcinoid tumor of the distal common bile duct. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:6 pubmed
  278. Soga J. Statistical evaluation of 2001 carcinoid cases with metastases, collected from literature: a comparative study between ordinary carcinoids and atypical varieties. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1998;17:3-12 pubmed
  279. Ma P, Blaszkowsky L, Bharti A, Ladanyi A, Kraeft S, Bruno A, et al. Circulating tumor cells and serum tumor biomarkers in small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:49-62 pubmed
  280. Kitajima T, Tomioka T, Tajima Y, Yamamoto O, Sasaki M, Kanematsu T. Small non-functioning endocrine tumor of pancreas: comparison with solid cystic tumor. J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:129-33 pubmed
  281. Iacono C, Serio G, Fugazzola C, Zamboni G, Bergamo Andreis I, Jannucci A, et al. Cystic islet cell tumors of the pancreas. A clinico-pathological report of two nonfunctioning cases and review of the literature. Int J Pancreatol. 1992;11:199-208 pubmed
  282. Piattelli A, Fioroni M, Rubini C. Gingival metastasis from a medullary thyroid carcinoma: case report. J Periodontol. 2000;71:112-6 pubmed
  283. Kargi A, Yörükoglu -, Aktas S, Cakalagaoglu -, Ermete M. Neuroendocrine differentiation in non-neuroendocrine thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 1996;6:207-10 pubmed
  284. Balci M, Tuncel A, Guzel O, Aslan Y, Sezgin T, Bilgin O, et al. Use of the nuclear matrix protein 22 Bladder Chek test™ in the diagnosis of residual urothelial cancer before a second transurethral resection of bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47:473-7 pubmed publisher
  285. Lotan Y, Svatek R, Krabbe L, Xylinas E, Klatte T, Shariat S. Prospective external validation of a bladder cancer detection model. J Urol. 2014;192:1343-8 pubmed publisher
  286. Salama R, Selem T, El Gammal M, Elhagagy A, Bakar S. Urinary tumor markers could predict survival in bladder carcinoma. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28:265-71 pubmed publisher
  287. Serretta V, Lo Presti D, Vasile P, Gange E, Esposito E, Menozzi I. Urinary NMP22 for the detection of recurrence after transurethral resection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: experience on 137 patients. Urology. 1998;52:793-6 pubmed
  288. Konety B. Molecular markers in bladder cancer: a critical appraisal. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:326-37 pubmed
  289. Stephan C, Ralla B, Jung K. Prostate-specific antigen and other serum and urine markers in prostate cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846:99-112 pubmed publisher
  290. Wallner L, Jacobsen S. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer mortality: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:318-26 pubmed publisher
  291. Warlick C, Allaf M, Carter H. Expectant treatment with curative intent in the prostate-specific antigen era: triggers for definitive therapy. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:51-7 pubmed
  292. Obort A, Ajadi M, Akinloye O. Prostate-specific antigen: any successor in sight?. Rev Urol. 2013;15:97-107 pubmed
  293. Heller J. Prostatic acid phosphatase: its current clinical status. J Urol. 1987;137:1091-103 pubmed
  294. Bilhartz D, Tindall D, Oesterling J. Prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase: biomolecular and physiologic characteristics. Urology. 1991;38:95-102 pubmed
  295. Ostrowski W, Kuciel R. Human prostatic acid phosphatase: selected properties and practical applications. Clin Chim Acta. 1994;226:121-9 pubmed
  296. Frenkel E, Tourtellotte C. Elevated serum acid phosphate associated with multiple myeloma. Case report with tissue enzyme assay. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110:345-9 pubmed
  297. Azumi N, Traweek S, Battifora H. Prostatic acid phosphatase in carcinoid tumors. Immunohistochemical and immunoblot studies. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:785-90 pubmed
  298. Luo L, Shi H, Liang Q, Jiang J, Qin S, Deng J. Diagnostic value of soluble mesothelin-related peptides for malignant mesothelioma: a meta-analysis. Respir Med. 2010;104:149-56 pubmed publisher
  299. Pass H, Carbone M. Current status of screening for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;21:97-104 pubmed publisher
  300. Creaney J, Robinson B. Serum and pleural fluid biomarkers for mesothelioma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009;15:366-70 pubmed publisher
  301. Sheppard M. Serum thyroglobulin and thyroid cancer. Q J Med. 1986;59:429-33 pubmed
  302. Aiello D, Manni A. Thyroglobulin measurement vs iodine 131 total-body scan for follow-up of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:437-9 pubmed
  303. Kenady D, Schwartz R. Thyroid: diagnostic techniques. Curr Opin Oncol. 1990;2:87-94 pubmed
  304. Gérard A, Daumerie C, Mestdagh C, Gohy S, de Burbure C, Costagliola S, et al. Correlation between the loss of thyroglobulin iodination and the expression of thyroid-specific proteins involved in iodine metabolism in thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4977-83 pubmed
  305. Adil A, Jafri R, Waqar A, Abbasi S, Matiul Haq -, Asghar A, et al. Frequency and clinical importance of anti-Tg auto-antibodies (ATG). J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003;13:504-6 pubmed
  306. Black E, Hoffenberg R. Should one measure serum thyroglobulin in the presence of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies?. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1983;19:597-601 pubmed
  307. Kelloff G, Sigman C. Cancer biomarkers: selecting the right drug for the right patient. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:201-14 pubmed publisher
  308. Papillon Cavanagh S, De Jay N, Hachem N, Olsen C, Bontempi G, Aerts H, et al. Comparison and validation of genomic predictors for anticancer drug sensitivity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:597-602 pubmed publisher
  309. Kerr D, Shi Y. Biological markers: Tailoring treatment and trials to prognosis. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:429-30 pubmed publisher
  310. Nandy A, Gangopadhyay S, Mukhopadhyay A. Individualizing breast cancer treatment-The dawn of personalized medicine. Exp Cell Res. 2014;320:1-11 pubmed publisher
  311. Crowley E, Di Nicolantonio F, Loupakis F, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:472-84 pubmed publisher
  312. Scher H, Morris M, Larson S, Heller G. Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:225-34 pubmed publisher
  313. Kachroo N, Gnanapragasam V. The role of treatment modality on the utility of predictive tissue biomarkers in clinical prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:1-24 pubmed publisher
  314. Krebs M, Metcalf R, Carter L, Brady G, Blackhall F, Dive C. Molecular analysis of circulating tumour cells-biology and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:129-44 pubmed publisher
  315. Han Y, Su C, Liu Z. Methods for detection of circulating cells in non-small cell lung cancer. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2014;19:896-903 pubmed
  316. Lianidou E, Strati A, Markou A. Circulating tumor cells as promising novel biomarkers in solid cancers. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2014;51:160-71 pubmed publisher
  317. Tutar Y. miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15:429 pubmed
  318. Danila D, Fleisher M, Scher H. Circulating tumor cells as biomarkers in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3903-12 pubmed publisher
  319. Cohen J, Li L, Wang Y, Thoburn C, Afsari B, Danilova L, et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science. 2018;359:926-930 pubmed publisher
  320. Zhang Z, Sun J, Bai Z, Li H, He S, Chen R, et al. MicroRNA-153 acts as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer and its role in cell migration and invasion. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:357-64 pubmed publisher
  321. Ortega F, Lorente J, Garcia Puche J, Ruiz M, Sanchez Martin R, De Miguel Pérez D, et al. miRNA in situ hybridization in circulating tumor cells--MishCTC. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9207 pubmed publisher
  322. Zhao L, Liu W, Xiao J, Cao B. The role of exosomes and "exosomal shuttle microRNA" in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Cancer Lett. 2015;356:339-46 pubmed publisher
  323. Logan M, Hawkins S. Role of microRNAs in cancers of the female reproductive tract: insights from recent clinical and experimental discovery studies. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015;128:153-80 pubmed publisher
  324. Zhang Y, Yang Q, Wang S. MicroRNAs: a new key in lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:1105-11 pubmed publisher
  325. Shin V, Chu K. MiRNA as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10432-9 pubmed publisher
  326. Gyparaki M, Basdra E, Papavassiliou A. MicroRNAs as regulatory elements in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;354:1-4 pubmed publisher
  327. Aftab M, Dinger M, Perera R. The role of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in the pathology, diagnosis, and management of melanoma. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;563:60-70 pubmed publisher
  328. Challagundla K, Fanini F, Vannini I, Wise P, Murtadha M, Malinconico L, et al. microRNAs in the tumor microenvironment: solving the riddle for a better diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014;14:565-74 pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139