Myc Antibody Review
Zacharoula Konsoula (zkons664 at yahoo dot com)
Georgetown University Medical Center, United States
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.3.178
Date
last modified : 2022-10-18; original version : 2013-03-19
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2013;3:178
Abstract

A comprehensive review about Myc tag antibody, and a summary of myc antibody applications from over 200 publications.

The c-Myc protein is an oncogenic transcription factor, encoded by the c-Myc gene on human chromosome 8q24. The c-Myc protein is implicated in several physiological processes including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression and cellular metabolism [4]. Deregulated expression of the c-myc has been reported in a variety of human tumors including breast carcinomas, colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [5, 6].

The c-Myc gene encodes a polypeptide with a predicted molecular weight of 49 kDa but also demonstrates aberrant electrophoretic mobility in western blotting to manifest an apparent molecular weight of around 62 kDa (p62c-myc) [7]. The anti-c-Myc antibody recognizes an epitope located within the amino acid sequence (Glu-Gln-Lys-Leu-Ile-Ser-Glu-Glu-Asp-Leu-) of the product of the human oncogene c-myc, also known as the c-Myc tag. The antibody detects the c-Myc tag sequence when it is placed at either the amino or the carboxyl terminus of the fusion protein [1]. The c-Myc epitope tag is used to elucidate the topology, movement, and modification of target proteins and protein complexes [8]. Myc-tagged expression vectors and proteins are often available from suppliers. For example, Choi JH et al employed full-length mouse Znrf3/RNF43 expression vector with a Myc–DDK epitope from OriGene to investigate its interaction with other proteins [9]. Figure 1 illustrates subcellular localization (present on the plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures) of constructs encoding N-terminal Myc epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 (Prenylation-dependent Association of Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatases) [1].

Myc Antibody Review  figure 1
Figure 1. Localization of N-terminal Myc Epitope-Tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3. Association of PRL phosphatases (PRL-1, -2, and -3) with the plasma membrane and intracellular punctate structures. Constructs encoding N-terminal Myc epitope-tagged PRL-1, -2, and -3 were transiently transfected into CHO cells, and the cells were processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to detect the expressed myc-PRL-1 (A), myc-PRL-2 (B), and myc-PRL-3 (C), respectively. Bar, 10 mm. Arrows indicate the labeling on the plasma membrane. Abbreviations: PRL., prenylation-dependent association of protein-tyrosine phosphatases. Reproduced from Figure 2 of [1].

Furthermore, the c-Myc epitope tag proffers the detection of poorly expressed or newly discovered proteins when specific antibodies are not attainable. The myc epitope tag is generally used to determine the expression levels of recombinant proteins in bacterial, yeast, and mammalian systems [10], sometimes in a tandem 6x format (6xMyc) [11]. Figure 2A illustrates western blotting of anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibodies to detect both endogenous c-Myc and a c-Myc protein fused to the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor (MycER). c-Myc and c-MycER are distinguished by the higher molecular weight of c-MycER fusion protein. In Figure 2B, immunofluorescence microscopy depicts the nucleus accumulation of c-MycER [2].

Myc Antibody Review  figure 2
Figure 2. c-Myc ER Expression and Localization in NHF-MycER. (A) Cell lysates from Normal Human Fibroblasts (NHF-MycER and NHF-BABE) were analyzed by Western blot using anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibodies to detect both endogenous c-Myc and c-MycER protein. c-Myc and c-MycER are distinguished by the higher molecular weight of c-MycER fusion protein. (B) Immunofluorescence microscopy of c-MycER. c-MycER was visualized in NHF-MycER cells in the absence or presence of ligand (top and lower panels, respectively) using anti-Myc monoclonal anti-bodies and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies. c-MycER rap-idly (30 min) accumulates in the nucleus after ligand addition. Actin was detected using Texas red-X phalloidin. Reproduced from Figure 1of [2].
Myc Antibody in the Literature

To facilitate Labome visitors to locate the most suited antibodies, including Myc tag antibody, Labome surveyed randomly selected publications. Table 1 lists the major suppliers.

Supplier Num Sample Reference
Santa Cruz Biotechnology 120 9E10 sc-40 [12-14]
MilliporeSigma (including Roche) 61 M4439 [15]
Cell Signaling Technology 29 2276 [16] ; 71D10 [17, 18] ; D84C12 [9]
Abcam 14 ab32 [19], ab24609 [12]
Thermo Fisher 9 [20]
BioLegend 7
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank 7
Clontech 5
Immunology Consultants Laboratory / ICL 1 [21]
Synaptic Systems 1 343 011
Table 1. Major suppliers of Myc antibodies and the numbers of citations among the publications surveyed by Labome.

Recently surveyed literature cite Santa Cruz's anti-myc antibodies in immunohistochemistry [22], immunohistochemistry [23], immunoprecipitation [24], and Western blots [25, 26]. Kulkarni S et al used Thermo Fisher anti-myc 6E10 for western blot and immunoprecipitation [20]. Ling Q et al used MilliporeSigma myc antibody for both western blot and immunoprecipitation from plant lysates [11].

Clone 9E10 for Myc tag

Clone 9E10 is the most commonly cited Myc antibody. Clone 9E10, a mouse monoclonal antibody (IgG1, kappa), was raised against a synthetic peptide [AEEQKLISEEDLLRKRREQLKHKLEQLRNSCA] comprising residues 408-439 of human c-myc [27]. The binding epitope is EQKLISEEDLN, and this is, of course, the myc tag, widely used in protein expression. The clone does not bind to rodent or avian myc proteins [27]. The clone is one of most researched antibody. Figures 3 and 4 display both its sequence information and the 3D structure with its epitope peptide [28]. A unique binding mode, antigen clasping, where two antigen-binding sites clasp the same epitope, contributes to its high affinity and specificity [29]. A variant of 9E10, Hyper-Myc, with improved affinity and thermal stability has been generated through in vitro evolution [30].

Myc Antibody Review  figure 3
Figure 3. Myc antibody 9E10 clone sequences. A: IgG1 heavy chain (GenBank: CAN87018.1) with 470 aa; B: kappa light chain (GenBank: CAN87019.1) with 238 aa. Data from NCBI.

Clone 9E10 has been extensively studied. Its epitope was investigated through substitutional analysis and length variation using peptide spot synthesis on cellulose [31], indicating the residues LISE are crucial for antibody binding, and the shortest peptide with a strong binding is KLISEEDL. The binding of 9E10 Fab fragment with its epitope peptide complex was investigated through x-ray structural analysis [28]. Interestingly, clone 9E10 failed to recognize two out of four recombinant proteins with the myc-tag in Western blot, while detecting all four proteins by immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation assays [32]. Clone 9E10 exhibits high context-dependent affinity and users of this clone should be keenly aware of the ramification of such a dependency [33]. There are more recent exchanges between researchers about the specificity of clone 9E10 [34, 35].

Myc Antibody Review  figure 4
Figure 4. Myc antibody 9E10 3D structure (MMDB ID: 62345PDB ID: 2OR9), with its epitope peptide (11 amino acids, in silver color), including the whole length kappa light chain (218 aa, in purple color), and heavy chain variable region with the CH1 region (228 aa, in blue color). Both image and Data from NCBI.

Researchers have used clone 9E10 from MilliporeSigma for western blots [15], from Synaptic Systems for dot blots and Western blots [36], from Thermo Fisher for immunoprecipitation and western blot [20], from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (e.g., sc-40) to perform western blot [13], immunoprecipitation [24], and ChIP-qPCR [37], from Abcam ( ab32) for immunopurifying myc-tagged DROSHA [19], from other suppliers to perform immunohistochemistry [38].

Other clones and polyclonals

The other cited clones include D84C12 [9] and 9B11 [39, 40] from Cell Signaling Technology. Schüchner S et al evaluated the binding affinities of monoclonal myc tag antibodies (clone 9E10, 4A6, 9B11 and 71D10) and two polyclonal antibodies with different neigboring amino acids and N- or C-terminal placements and found clone 4A6 and 9B11 to be less variable than others in Western blotting [33]. The most cited polyclonal Myc antibody is sc-764 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, which has been discontinued, see the example in Figure 5. Frottin F et al immunoprecipitated fusion proteins with Miltenyi biotech µMACS c-myc Isolation kits to study nucleolus as a phase-separated protein quality control entity [12]. Steichen JM et al screened a protein surface display library with a C-terminal myc tag using an FITC-conjugated chicken anti-myc polyclonal antibody from ICL [21].

Please note that there are antibodies against endogenous c-Myc, not the myc tag. For example, Abcam ab32072 is a rabbit monoclonal antibody against the N-terminal of human c-myc, and has been used [41]. It can not be used to detect the myc tag. So are others like Abcam ab39688 [42].

Myc Antibody Review  figure 5
Figure 5. ERα and c-MYC Co-regulate Estrogen-Responsive Genes. Estrogen stimulation enhances the interaction between estrogen receptor (ERα) and c-MYC in the nucleus of MCF7 cells. MCF7 cells were hormone-starved for 3 days and treated with 10 nM 17β-estradiol (E2) for the indicated time periods. Nuclear extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies or rabbit IgG (negative control). Precipitates were subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies against ERα or c-MYC as indicated. Abbreviations are as follows: I.P., immunoprecipitation; I.B., immunoblot. Reproduced from Figure 7D of [3].
c-Myc tag antibody questions
What techniques can be used to analyze or purify c-myc tagged proteins?

c-Myc fusion proteins can be detected by western blotting, immunofluorescence microscopy, immunoprecipitation, and affinity chromatography.

What is the advantage of c-myc epitope tagging over other commonly used fusion tags techniques?

The small size of the c-myc epitope tag (EQKLISEEDL; ten amino acids long) compared to other commonly used tags [i.e., GST (Glutathione S-transferase; 211 amino acids) or GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein; 238 amino acids] makes it less likely to disrupt the target protein's properties (conformation, function, and localization).

Where can the c-myc epitope be placed?

The c-myc epitope can be placed at either the amino or carboxy terminus of the targeted protein in transfected cells.

How can be prevented the degradation of c- myc tagged protein?

A cocktail of different protease inhibitors should be included in purification and analysis buffers to ensure an intact tagged protein.

How much is the tag-specific antibody reagent needed?

No precise answer can be given since distinct applications request different amounts of tag-specific antibody reagents.

References
  1. Zeng Q, Si X, Horstmann H, Xu Y, Hong W, Pallen C. Prenylation-dependent association of protein-tyrosine phosphatases PRL-1, -2, and -3 with the plasma membrane and the early endosome. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:21444-52 pubmed
  2. Vafa O, Wade M, Kern S, Beeche M, Pandita T, Hampton G, et al. c-Myc can induce DNA damage, increase reactive oxygen species, and mitigate p53 function: a mechanism for oncogene-induced genetic instability. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1031-44 pubmed
  3. Cheng A, Jin V, Fan M, Smith L, Liyanarachchi S, Yan P, et al. Combinatorial analysis of transcription factor partners reveals recruitment of c-MYC to estrogen receptor-alpha responsive promoters. Mol Cell. 2006;21:393-404 pubmed
  4. Boxer L, Dang C. Translocations involving c-myc and c-myc function. Oncogene. 2001;20:5595-610 pubmed
  5. Pelengaris S, Khan M. The many faces of c-MYC. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;416:129-36 pubmed
  6. Dang C. MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 2012;149:22-35 pubmed publisher
  7. Kunnumakkara A, Sung B, Ravindran J, Diagaradjane P, Deorukhkar A, Dey S, et al. {Gamma}-tocotrienol inhibits pancreatic tumors and sensitizes them to gemcitabine treatment by modulating the inflammatory microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8695-705 pubmed publisher
  8. Zhang H, Saitoh H, Matunis M. Enzymes of the SUMO modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:6498-508 pubmed
  9. Choi J, Zhong X, McAlpine W, Liao T, Zhang D, Fang B, et al. LMBR1L regulates lymphopoiesis through Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Science. 2019;364: pubmed publisher
  10. Shimizu K, Kawasaki Y, Hiraga S, Tawaramoto M, Nakashima N, Sugino A. The fifth essential DNA polymerase phi in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is localized to the nucleolus and plays an important role in synthesis of rRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9133-8 pubmed
  11. Ling Q, Broad W, Trösch R, Töpel M, Demiral Sert T, Lymperopoulos P, et al. Ubiquitin-dependent chloroplast-associated protein degradation in plants. Science. 2019;363: pubmed publisher
  12. Frottin F, Schueder F, Tiwary S, Gupta R, Korner R, Schlichthaerle T, et al. The nucleolus functions as a phase-separated protein quality control compartment. Science. 2019;365:342-347 pubmed publisher
  13. Li L, Rispoli R, Patient R, Ciau Uitz A, Porcher C. Etv6 activates vegfa expression through positive and negative transcriptional regulatory networks in Xenopus embryos. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1083 pubmed publisher
  14. Mena E, Kjolby R, Saxton R, Werner A, Lew B, Boyle J, et al. Dimerization quality control ensures neuronal development and survival. Science. 2018;362: pubmed publisher
  15. Liu P, Župa E, Neuner A, Böhler A, Loerke J, Flemming D, et al. Insights into the assembly and activation of the microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC. Nature. 2020;578:467-471 pubmed publisher
  16. Akbari P, Gilani A, Sosina O, Kosmicki J, Khrimian L, Fang Y, et al. Sequencing of 640,000 exomes identifies GPR75 variants associated with protection from obesity. Science. 2021;373: pubmed publisher
  17. Gur Cohen S, Yang H, Baksh S, Miao Y, Levorse J, Kataru R, et al. Stem cell-driven lymphatic remodeling coordinates tissue regeneration. Science. 2019;366:1218-1225 pubmed publisher
  18. Garcia Jove Navarro M, Kashida S, Chouaib R, Souquere S, Pierron G, Weil D, et al. RNA is a critical element for the sizing and the composition of phase-separated RNA-protein condensates. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3230 pubmed publisher
  19. Pandolfini L, Barbieri I, Bannister A, Hendrick A, Andrews B, Webster N, et al. METTL1 Promotes let-7 MicroRNA Processing via m7G Methylation. Mol Cell. 2019;74:1278-1290.e9 pubmed publisher
  20. Kulkarni S, Lied A, Kulkarni V, Rucevic M, Martin M, Walker Sperling V, et al. CCR5AS lncRNA variation differentially regulates CCR5, influencing HIV disease outcome. Nat Immunol. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  21. Steichen J, Lin Y, Havenar Daughton C, Pecetta S, Ozorowski G, Willis J, et al. A generalized HIV vaccine design strategy for priming of broadly neutralizing antibody responses. Science. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  22. Carmena M, Pinson X, Platani M, Salloum Z, Xu Z, Clark A, et al. The chromosomal passenger complex activates Polo kinase at centromeres. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001250 pubmed publisher
  23. Kim N, Min K, Kang K, Lee E, Kim H, Moon K, et al. Regulation of retinal axon growth by secreted Vax1 homeodomain protein. elife. 2014;3:e02671 pubmed publisher
  24. Pietrobon V, Fréon K, Hardy J, Costes A, Iraqui I, Ochsenbein F, et al. The chromatin assembly factor 1 promotes Rad51-dependent template switches at replication forks by counteracting D-loop disassembly by the RecQ-type helicase Rqh1. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001968 pubmed publisher
  25. Xia R, Jia H, Fan J, Liu Y, Jia J. USP8 promotes smoothened signaling by preventing its ubiquitination and changing its subcellular localization. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001238 pubmed publisher
  26. Liu L, Liu C, Hou X, Xi W, Shen L, Tao Z, et al. FTIP1 is an essential regulator required for florigen transport. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001313 pubmed publisher
  27. Evan G, Lewis G, Ramsay G, Bishop J. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5:3610-6 pubmed
  28. Krauss N, Wessner H, Welfle K, Welfle H, Scholz C, Seifert M, et al. The structure of the anti-c-myc antibody 9E10 Fab fragment/epitope peptide complex reveals a novel binding mode dominated by the heavy chain hypervariable loops. Proteins. 2008;73:552-65 pubmed publisher
  29. Hattori T, Lai D, Dementieva I, Montaño S, Kurosawa K, Zheng Y, et al. Antigen clasping by two antigen-binding sites of an exceptionally specific antibody for histone methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:2092-7 pubmed publisher
  30. Russo G, Unkauf T, Meier D, Wenzel E, Langreder N, Schneider K, et al. In vitro evolution of myc-tag antibodies: in-depth specificity and affinity analysis of Myc1-9E10 and Hyper-Myc. Biol Chem. 2022;403:479-494 pubmed publisher
  31. Hilpert K, Hansen G, Wessner H, Kuttner G, Welfle K, Seifert M, et al. Anti-c-myc antibody 9E10: epitope key positions and variability characterized using peptide spot synthesis on cellulose. Protein Eng. 2001;14:803-6 pubmed
  32. Fan H, Villegas C, Chan A, Wright J. Myc-epitope tagged proteins detected with the 9E10 antibody in immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation assays but not in western blot analysis. Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;76:125-8 pubmed
  33. Schüchner S, Behm C, Mudrak I, Ogris E. The Myc tag monoclonal antibody 9E10 displays highly variable epitope recognition dependent on neighboring sequence context. Sci Signal. 2020;13: pubmed publisher
  34. Cattoretti G. Specificity of anti-MYC antibodies. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:298 pubmed publisher
  35. Im I, Son Y, Jung K, Kang I, Teh B, Lee K, et al. Reply to Cattoretti: Specificity of anti-MYC antibodies. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:299-300 pubmed publisher
  36. Götzke H, Kilisch M, Martínez Carranza M, Sograte Idrissi S, Rajavel A, Schlichthaerle T, et al. The ALFA-tag is a highly versatile tool for nanobody-based bioscience applications. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4403 pubmed publisher
  37. Gonen N, Futtner C, Wood S, Garcia Moreno S, Salamone I, Samson S, et al. Sex reversal following deletion of a single distal enhancer of Sox9. Science. 2018;360:1469-1473 pubmed publisher
  38. Reim G, Hruzova M, Goetze S, Basler K. Protection of armadillo/β-Catenin by armless, a novel positive regulator of wingless signaling. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001988 pubmed publisher
  39. Marschner K, Kollmann K, Schweizer M, Braulke T, Pohl S. A key enzyme in the biogenesis of lysosomes is a protease that regulates cholesterol metabolism. Science. 2011;333:87-90 pubmed publisher
  40. Sfeir A, de Lange T. Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem. Science. 2012;336:593-7 pubmed publisher
  41. Hines J, Lartigue S, Dong H, Qian Y, Crews C. MDM2-Recruiting PROTAC Offers Superior, Synergistic Antiproliferative Activity via Simultaneous Degradation of BRD4 and Stabilization of p53. Cancer Res. 2019;79:251-262 pubmed publisher
  42. Klotz R, Thomas A, Teng T, Han S, Iriondo O, Li L, et al. Circulating Tumor Cells Exhibit Metastatic Tropism and Reveal Brain Metastasis Drivers. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:86-103 pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139