Laboratory Mice and Rats
Mary Johnson (han at labome dot com)
Synatom Research, Princeton, New Jersey, United States
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.2.113
Date
last modified : 2023-12-25; original version : 2012-10-05
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2012;2:113
Abstract

A summary and overview of the mice and rats used in biomedical research, based on a survey of formal publications.

  • C57BL/6 and BALB/c are the main mouse strains.
  • Sprague-Dawley and Wistar are the main rat strains.
  • The Jackson Laboratory, Charles River Laboratories, Taconic Biosciences, and Harlan Laboratories are the main suppliers.
  • Major research applications are in immunology, oncology, physiology, pathology, and neuroscience.
  • Specific strains or ES cell lines can be searched at IMSR database.

Introduction

Animal models have been critical tools since the early days of scientific discovery. Today they are indispensable in biomedical research contributing to our understanding of the functions of genes, the etiology and mechanisms of different diseases, and the effectiveness and the toxicities of medicines and chemicals. The genomes of the major model organisms have been sequenced, verifying a high level of genetic conservation among model organisms and humans.

Labome surveys literature for instruments and reagents. Labome has surveyed formal publications citing animal models to provide an overview of animal models in publications (Table 1). The survey results indicate that mouse is the overwhelmingly preferred laboratory animal; the most widely used mouse and rat strains are C57BL/6 mice, BALB/c mice, Sprague-Dawley rats and Wistar rats. Other strains, such as A/J mice, CD1 mice, and ICR mice, were also used. The majority of these animals are supplied by four major providers, The Jackson Laboratory, Charles River Laboratories, Taconic Biosciences and Harlan Laboratories. The aforementioned animal models are used for research in immunology, oncology, physiology, pathology, and increasingly, neuroscience. Some of the interesting mouse models are discussed later in this article.

animal strain supplier numreference
mouse C57BL/6 The Jackson Laboratory 103 [1, 2]
Charles River 30 [3]
Taconic Biosciences 17 [4, 5]
Harlan Laboratories 10
BALB/CThe Jackson Laboratory 15 [6, 7]
Charles River 12 [8]
Taconic Biosciences 5
Harlan Laboratories 3
CD-1 14 [9, 10]
SCID 11 [11, 12]
A/J 4
rat Sprague-Dawley 16 [13, 14]
Wistar 9 [15, 16]
Long Evans 3 [15, 17]
Table 1. The number of publications (num) cites each major mouse and rat strains. Each strain includes substrains, hybrid strains, and background strains. The numbers of publications citing major suppliers are indicated as well. Due to the complexity of the animal strain/stock names used in the publications, the number for each strain is the lower bound.

Albinism of laboratory rodents: The majority of laboratory rodents are albinos, due to a common mutation in tyrosinase gene in all albino laboratory rat strains [18] and in at least some of the albino mouse strains [19]. Tyrosinase is the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of melanin pigment. The prevalence of albinism among laboratory rodents is because many of the earliest established strains were albino, and also albinism is an easy selection marker in the early days.

Type 2021 2015 2010 2000
Mice, inbred strains 28559 29504 24403 11739
Mice, transgenic 11524 15653 14380 5739
Mice, knockout 7465 9742 9182 3400
Mice, congenic 28 28 111 44
Mice, none of above * 21587 34528 30080 16308
Table 2. Types of mice and the frequency of citations in PUBMED bibliographic database, as of July 8, 2022. As PUBMED continues to update its database, the number will change, especially for the most recent year. * PUBMED search parameter: mice [ mesh] NOT mice, inbred strains [ mesh] NOT mice, transgenic [ mesh] NOT mice, knockout [ mesh] NOT mice, congenic [ mesh].
Mice

Mice are the most frequently cited animal model in biomedical publications (Table 1). Most of the publications surveyed by Labome cited various strains of mice (along with rats, and occasionally rabbits, ferrets, guinea pigs, and rhesus macaque). Tables 2 and 3 list the number of articles annotated with specific medical subject headings (MeSH) or search parameters related to mice in the PUBMED database. It is clear that research conducted on mouse models continues to be an important part of our collective research efforts and knowledge, even with ongoing efforts to replacing animal testing with cell culture models or computational prediction, especially for toxicological studies [20].

The prevalence of mouse models in biomedical research is not surprising given that mice require relatively inexpensive care, reproduce quickly, and have a high genetic similarity to humans. Technologies, such as transgenic methods, have been very well developed in mouse models to study the genetics and the functions of specific genes. Mouse models of many human diseases have also been developed to advance the studies of disease pathogenesis, and to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicities of various candidate drugs. However, laboratory mice are generally raised in abnormally hygienic facilities that differ from the pathogen-rich environments of free-living populations of mice and/or pet store mice. The latter mice more closely resemble humans in terms of immune traits [21]. Rosshart SP et al implanted C57BL/6 embryos into wild mice to produce a new colony of C57BL/6 mice ("wildlings") which retained natural microbiota and pathogens [22]. In spite of this, the low variation and useful attributes described above have made mouse models an invaluable tool for advancing biomedical progress.

strains 2020 2015 2010 2000
C57BL 20983 18944 14961 5437
BALB/c 8293 7913 7052 4230
ICR 1359 1476 1258 709
NOD 1151 1207 651 247
C3H 228 402 642 862
DBA 240 362 457 496
CBA 145 225 349 566
Hairless 56 110 127 87
MRL lpr 72 77 70 115
NZB 19 30 56 55
Table 3. Mouse inbred strains and their citations in PUBMED database in selected years, as of July 8, 2022. Searches were done through MESH tree terms and NCBI MESH annotations.

Inbred strains, transgenic and congenic mice with inbred backgrounds are commonly used mouse models. An inbred strain is defined as a strain that has been through at least 20 generations of sib-mating (or its equivalent), making animals from the same inbred strain effectively genetically identical. Transgenic mice with particular mutations of interest are relatively simple to produce with modern genetic engineering methods like the injection of targeting vectors or CRISPR. Once produced these mutations of interest frequently must be bred into a congenic line. Congenic strains, which introduce a particular trait or mutation into a predominantly inbred background, are achieved through repeated backcrosses of the mutation of interest into an inbred background strain usually for at least 10 generations.

The most cited mouse strains are C57BL/6, BALB/c, CD-1, SCID, and A/J (Table 4). Only CD-1 is an outbred strain. Below we briefly discuss each of these strains.

strainmajor featuresadvantagesmain applications
C57BL/6 inbred, black strain stability, easy breeding physiological or pathological models for in vivo experiments, background strain for transgenics and congenics
BALB/c inbred, albino, immunodeficient easy breeding, tumor-prone hybridoma and monoclonal antibody production, research models for cancer therapy and immunology.
CD-1 outbred, albino genetic variability positional cloning, genotypic selection, toxicology testing (questionable)
CB17 SCID inbred, albino no T and B cells, tumor transplantation immunodeficient animal model for testing new cancer treatments and as hosts for human immune system tissues.
Table 4. Major mouse strains, their features, and applications. Searches were done through MESH tree terms and NCBI MESH annotations.
C57BL/6 mice

C57BL/6 mice, also called "C57 black 6" or simply "Black 6" or abbreviated as 'B6', has the advantages of strain stability and easy breeding. This is also the first mouse strain whose genome was fully sequenced in 2002, soon after the human genome. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium IMPC [23], launched in September, 2011, aims to catalog the function of every mouse gene in this strain through knockout technologies.

The use of C57BL/6 mice consists of three main overlapping approaches. First, they frequently serve as physiological or pathological models for in vivo studies. For example, Strickley JD et al investigated mouse immunity to commensal papillomaviruses using C57BL/6 and other mice [24]. Szőnyi A et al used wild-type and transgenic C57Bl/6J mice (ChAT-iRES-Cre, CRH-iRES-Cre, vGAT-iRES-Cre, vGAT-iRES-Cre::Gt(ROSA26)SorCAG/tdTomato ) to study the role of brainstem nucleus incertus GABAergic cells in contextual memory formation [25]. Zott B et al studied the effects of beta-amyloid peptide dimers on the suppression of glutamate reuptake and neuronal hyperactivation in C57BL/6N wild-type mice and Alzheimer's disease models [26]. Also, in 2015, using C57BL/6 mice, researchers discovered central nervous system lymphatic vessels [27]. Second, they are often applied to build transgenic mouse models, such as those with the photoactivatable green fluorescent protein (PA-GFP) [28]. Many such transgenic lines are then used for the in vivo studies just mentioned. Third, C57BL/6 mice are often used as a background strain for the generation of congenics with both spontaneous and induced mutations. However, care must be taken because specific sublines may harbor genetic variants, which may introduce complications in any gene-targeting studies, as reported in the case of C57BL/6NHsd [29].

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 1
Figure 1. Female C57BL/6, 22 months of age.

Due to its popularity several substrains of C57BL/6 have been established. It is important to know with which substrain you are working because important genetic and phenotypic variation exists among them [30]. The common C57BL/6 substrains include C57BL/6J (maintained at The Jackson Laboratory) and C57BL/6N (established at National Institute of Health). IMPC selected embryonic stem cells from C57BL/6N [31, 32], while Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium [33] and Allen Brain Atlas [34] used C57BL/6J. The substrains have phenotypic differences [35, 36], and some of the underlying genetic variations have been identified [35, 37]. For example, a nonsynonymous mutation of serine to phenylalanine (S968F) in cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2 (Cyfip2), present in the C57BL/6N substrain and not in the B57BL/6J substrain, is responsible for lower acute and sensitized response to cocaine and methamphetamine observed in the substrain [37].

Most C57BL/6 substrains are "genetically ablated of one of the most important mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme, transhydrogenase (gene NNT), due to a natural deletion in the exons of this gene that completely prevents the expression of the protein [35, 38] ", and the mutation is responsible for the impaired glucose clearance and slightly higher resting glucose levels than strains with wild-type Nnt such as C57BL/6NJ [39]. C57BL/6J mice with the Nnt mutation have a normal lifespan, are not diabetic, and have the normal diet-induced obesity response (from Jackson Laboratories).

Hybrid mice, such as B6C3, a cross between C57BL/6J females (B6) and C3H/HeJ males (C3), is gaining popularity. The hybrid mice are heterozygous genetically and tend to serve as a background for some deleterious mutations. Holth JK et al used Jackson Laboratory B6C3F1/J mice (#100010) and B6C3 tau P301S mice (# 008169) to study mouse brain interstitial fluid tau level during the sleep-wake cycle [40].

Among the articles surveyed by Labome, a significant percentage cites the C57BL/6 mouse strain. It is likely that the C57BL/6 strain will continue to be the preferred strain, due to the fact that its genome has been sequenced, to the concerted effort of gene functional analysis by IMPC and other systematic efforts such as connectome construction [41]. While the advantage of using a "standard" strain in research is apparent, interesting issues have been raised about the drawbacks of such a practice, see The Trouble With Black-6.

C57BL/6 mice from The Jackson Laboratory

Wild type, congenic, and transgenic/knockout C57BL/6 mice from The Jackson Laboratory (C57BL/6J) have been used to study, for example, metabolic orchestration of cell death by AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of RIPK1 [42], biomarker discovery for Alzheimer's disease [1], transient microbiota depletion [43], the innate myeloid cell memory to nonself MHC molecules [5], the effect of high salt diets on tau hyperphosphorylation in brain and dementia [44], the induction of transcription factors in neurons by depolarization [45], the role of brainstem nucleus incertus GABAergic cells in contextual memory formation [25], neurogenesis in prostate cancer [46], venous thrombosis and NETosis [47], recipient hosts for adoptive transfer [48], the role of synaptotagmin-3 in endocytosis and synaptic strength [49], alpha-synuclein neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease [50]. When crossed with mice having a floxed gene, nestin-Cre transgenic C57BL/6J mice from Jackson laboratory can be used to achieve conditional inactivation of the gene in the nervous system [51]. ROSA26R(EYFP) mice with a background of C57BL/6 are commonly used to indicate the Cre expression [52]. Chopra S et al backcrossed Vav1cre and CD11ccre mice with other floxed mice to generate conditional knockouts in leukocytes or dendritic cells, respectively [53]. Rosshart SP et al used SPF C57BL/6 mice from the Jackson Laboratory to study the microbiota and immune responses of laboratory mice born to wild mice [22].

C57BL/6 mice from Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories (also its joint venture Vital River in China) is another major supplier of C57BL/6 mice. As with C57BL/6J, Charles River C57BL/6 (C57BL/NCrl) mice have been used to study a wide array of subjects in biology. This has included SOX2-chromatin interaction [54], histone modifications during human parental-to-zygotic transition [55], and cerebrospinal fluid influx during ischemia [3].

C57BL/6 mice from Taconic Biosciences

C57BL/6 mice from Taconic (C57BL/6NTac) were used to study the innate myeloid cell memory to nonself MHC molecules [5], the microbiota and immune responses of laboratory mice born to wild mice [22], lysosome function and macrophage homeostasis [56], the involvement of rapamycin through mTORC2 disruption in insulin resistance [57] and skin microbiota [58]. Hang S et al studied C57BL/6NTac mice with segmented filamentous bacteria from Taconic Bioscience [59]. Ciccone R et al used Tg2576 mice and WT littermates from Taconic, as an Alzheimer disease model to study neuronal hyperactivity [60].

C57BL/6 mice from Harlan Laboratories

Harlan Laboratories C57BL/6 mice were used to study the regulatory mechanism of T cell differentiation [61].

C57BL/6 from other providers

Wang L et al purchased C57BL/6 mice from Joint Ventures Sipper BK Experimental Animal in Shanghai, China to study the innate immune response against nuclear viral DNA [62]. Persson EK et al used C57BL/6 mice (6 to 7 weeks old) from Janvier Labs in Saint-Berthevin, France to investigate Charcot-Leyden crystals [63]. B de Laval et al obtained CD45.2 mice from Janvier [64]. Noda S et al transplanted human primary dental pulp stem cells into the calvarial bone cavities of C57BL/6JJcl mice obtained from CLEA Japan [65]. Dominy SS et al obtained specific pathogen–free (SPF) female BALB/c mice from Envigo to study Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer's disease brains [66]. Moro A et al isolated dermal fibroblasts for 3D fibrin gel assays from Envigo C57BL/6 mice to study the role of microRNA in tissue stiffness hemeostasis [67]. Academic or national animal facilities are also suppliers. C57BL/6J mice of both sexes from the NIA Aged Rodent Colonies were used to study the involvement of L1 retrotransposon during cellular senescence [68].

BALB/c mice

BALB/c is an albino, immunodeficient inbred mouse strain. BALB/c mice have the characteristics of easy breeding and minimal weight variations between males and females. While BALB/c mice serve as a general purpose animal model, this strain is used extensively for hybridoma and monoclonal antibody production, for example, for the generation of anti-neuropilin-1 antibodies [7], anti-trptase antibodies [69], and others [70], and are especially useful for research in cancer therapy and immunology. It is noteworthy that the mammary tumour incidence in BALB/c mice is low, but they are very sensitive to carcinogens, and can develop lung tumours, reticular neoplasms, renal tumours, and other cancers. In addition, mineral oil injection can readily induce plasmacytomas in BALB/c strain.

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 2
Figure 2. BALB/c mouse. Courtesy of The Jackson Laboratory

Examples of research with BALB/c mice include examination of antiplasmodial immunity in mosquitos [71], demonstrating the host response to influenza A virus is modulated by the novel protein PA-X [72], and studying the effectiveness of antibody CR8020 against group 2 influenza viruses in BALB/c mice from Charles River [73]. Charles River BALB/c mice were used to perform parasite infection to study the antiplasmodial immunity in mosquitos [71].

One common application of BALB/c, as with C57BL/6, is to serve as the background strain for various gene deficiency/knockout studies.

As stated above, BALB/c mice play important roles in oncological research. For example, Mauffrey P et al used Balb/c nu/nu from Charles River laboratories to study neurogenesis in prostate cancer [46]. Besse A et al studied proteasome inhibition in age-matched female Balb/c mice from Charles River to optimize the treatment of multiple myeloma with individual proteasome inhibitors [74]. Yi W et al performed subcutaneous xenografts by using Charles River Laboratories athymic nude (Nu/Nu) mice to show that FGFR-TACC fusion happened in specific GBM patients [75] and studied the role of PFK1 glycosylation in cancer cell growth using Charles River Laboratories nude mice [76]. Kessler JD et al demonstrated that Myc-dependent cancer needs SUMOylation for tumorigenesis by performing breast cancer cell line xenografts using Harlan Labs female athymic nude Foxn1-nu mice [77].

CD-1 mice

Another commonly used mouse model is the albino CD-1 mouse. While both C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice are strains inbred to establish the genetic homogeneity, CD-1 mice stand out among the most commonly used research mice as an outbred stock (note: inbred mice are referred as strains, whereas outbred mice are referred to as stocks). The genetic variability in such outbred research animal models can be an advantage in the positional cloning of quantitative trait loci and phenotypic or genotypic selection of particular traits. However, the usage of outbred stocks like CD-1, in research fields such as toxicology (safety and efficacy testing), aging, and oncology have been critically assessed and may not be beneficial in many cases [78]. For example, Luther A et al conducted pharmacokinetic, toxicity, in vivo efficacy studies of candidate antibiotics in CD-1 mice [79].

Several publications used CD-1 mice, from Charles River Laboratories [10, 80] or Harlan [9]. Labonté B et al studied the regulatory role of a novle lncRAN MAALIN on impulsive and aggressive behaviours in CD-1 mice [80]. Patzke C et al obtained primary hippocampal or astrocyte culture from newborn CD1 wild type mice from Charles River Laboratories [81].

CB17 SCID mice

CB17 SCID mouse (SCID means severe combined immunodeficiency) is an albino strain with a spontaneous SCID mutation. The mutation prevents the development and maturation of both T and B cells. However, SCID mice have normal NK cells, macrophages and granulocytes. They share the same appearance as the normal mice. Due to the SCID mutation, the success ratio of human tumor transplantation is very high (even higher than nude mice), which makes them into a valuable immunodeficient animal model for testing new cancer treatments, for example [11], and as hosts for human immune system tissues.

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 3
Figure 3. SCID mouse. From Dr. Patricia Brown, NCI, NIH.

Eaton JK et al determined the pharmacokinetic properties

of GPX4 protein inhibitor, JKE-1674, in SCID mice from Janvier Laboratories [82].

A/J mice

The A/J mouse is another common albino model, with unique characteristics such as a late-onset progressive muscular dystrophy and adrenal cortical hormone induced congenital cleft palate. It also has a high incidence of spontaneous lung adenomas, which can easily develop in response to carcinogens.

Labome identified 4 publications using A/J mice as animal models (Table 1). Takeda K et al used A/J mice in their study of the role of death receptor 5 mediated-apoptosis in cholestatic liver disease [83]. A/J mice were used by Losick VP et al to investigate the role of a hemidominant Naip5 allele in immunity [84], by Sanders CJ et al to show the role of flagellin in adaptive immunity [85], and by Neunuebel MR et al to investigate SidD modulation of Rab1 de-AMPylation in L. pneumophila infection [86].

ICR mice

ICR mice, also an albino strain, originated in Switzerland and were selected by Dr. Hauschka to create a fertile mouse line. This outbred stock was named after the Institute of Cancer Research in the USA [78, 87]. ICR mice are characterized by docile nature, high productivity, rapid growth rate and a low incidence of spontaneous tumors [88]. Main suppliers of ICR mice are Taconic and Japan SLC. ICR mice are a general-purpose model, used in particular in toxicology, neurobiology, oncology, epidemiology, infection, pharmacology, and also in product safety testing. Nagamatsu G et al obtained embryonic and newborn ovaries from ICR mice to investigate the dormancy of immature oocytes in primordial follicles [89]. Luther A et al tested in vivo tolerability of candidate antibiotics in ICR mice [79].

Other mice strains and genetically-modified mice

Other mouse strains such as FVB/N mice from Charles River [24, 90], PWK/PhJ from Jackson Laboratory [55], NMRI nude mice [91] and Swiss Webster (SW) mice [92, 93], are also used in biomedical research.

Genetically-defined and genetically-modified mice (and rats) are widely used in research to investigate the function of specific genes, and to serve as experimental models for different human disease. Thousands of such strains are available, with a myriad of gene alterations, strain selections, and potential applications. Also extensively used are mice with other gene alterations, such as fluorescent reporter mouse lines [94, 95].

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 4
Figure 4. Lepr(db-3J) and normal mouse. Lepr(db-3J) mice are "obese, hyperphagic, cold intolerant, insulin resistant, and infertile". Courtesy of The Jackson Laboratory
Variation among mouse models

Differences exist among the various mouse models and it is important to be aware of this variation. For example, the behavioral difference among mouse strains/stocks is common. C57BL/6 and Swiss Webster mice had different levels of sociability [96] and responded differently to severe spinal cord injury [97]. Dizocilpine maleate (MK-801) showed differential effects on cerebrocortical neuronal injury in C57BL/6J, NSA, and ICR mice [98]. Significant performance differences between two related outbred albino stocks of mice, ICR and CD1, were observed in cognitive tasks. ICR suffers from a severe visual impairment making this stock difficult to use in the Morris water maze that requires good visual perception. CD1 does not suffer from grossly impaired vision but, similarly to the ICR strain, CD1 mice exhibit decreased freezing in all phases of context-dependent fear conditioning [99]. In addition, ICR mice from different sources may give rise to different, even contradictory research results [100].

Rats

Another rodent, the rat (Rattus norvegicus), is the second most cited animal model used in biomedical research. Compared to mice, rats are bigger, generally more aggressive, and more resistant to various ailments. Sprague-Dawley and Wistar are the two most frequently used rat models. Similar to most common mouse models, these two rat strains are albino. On the other hand, both rat models are outbred stocks while the most commonly used mice are inbred strains.

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 5
Figure 5. Sprague-Dawley rat. Courtesy of Harlan Laboratories
Sprague-Dawley rat

The Sprague-Dawley rat is a hybrid albino strain with a long narrow head. It has a high reproductive rate and low incidence of spontaneous tumors. Its calm temperament and easy handling are welcome features to both scientists and animal lab technicians. Most of publications Labome surveyed using Sprague-Dawley rats as animal models were from Charles River, for example, [101].

Sprague-Dawley rats are used extensively in neurobiological research. Brigidi GS et al isolated hippocampal neuronal cells from P0 Sprague–Dawley rats from Charles River [45].

The pathological investigation is another area that Sprague-Dawley rats are frequently utilized. Lundby A et al injected epidermal growth factor into Sprague-Dawley rats from Charles River to study tyrosine phosphorylation in lungs [102].

Wistar rat

Wistar rat is another common hybrid albino model animal. It has the distinct honor of being the first rat stock developed to serve as a model animal. The substrains of Wistar rats: Wistar Hannover (Han/Wistart) and Wistar Unilever (WU) rat are outbred; while Wistar Kyoto and Wistar Furth are inbred strains. Sprague-Dawley rats were derived from Wistar rat.

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 6
Figure 6. Lobund-Wistar rat. From NCI, NIH.

MC Silva et al investigated CNS penetration of an ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD2014 in Han Wistar male rats purchased from Vital River [103]. Eaton JK et al isolated hepatocytes from Han/Wistar rats to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of GPX4 inhibitors [82]. Duncan A et al obtained Wistar rats from Charles River to study the role of habenular TCF7L2 in connecting nicotine addiction to diabetes [16].

Animal Suppliers
The Jackson Laboratory

The Jackson Laboratory, founded by Clarence Cook Little, who produced the inbred mouse strain C57BL, among others, is the most cited experimental murine animal supplier. More than 11,000 strains of mice are available from The Jackson Laboratory. It also maintains an integrated mouse information resource. It distributed 3.0 million mice to more than 1900 institutions in 75 countries (The Jackson Laboratory website).

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 7
Figure 7. The Jackson Laboratory

The Jackson Laboratory is the primary source for common mouse strains like C57BL, BALB/c mouse strains, and rat strains, and less common strains like FvB/NJ [104], and 129 X1/SvJ [73].

Laboratory Mice and Rats figure 8
Figure 8. DBA/2J mouse. Courtesy of The Jackson Laboratory

In addition, many of congenic and transgenic mouse strains also came from The Jackson Laboratory, such as hAPP-J20 [105], Nlrp3−/− and Casp1−/− [106], APP/PS1 mice [107], NSG mice (NOD-SCID-IL2R gamma chain-deficient [6, 108, 109], Rag1-/- [110], Down syndrome model Ts65Dn [111], lineage-tracing R26YFP [112], Rag2-/- [113], Xpc−/− and Cd8−/− [24], Rosa26LSL-spCas9-eGFP (026175), ChAT-Cre (006410), ChATDW167 TRAP (030250), BAT-GAL (00531) and ROSA-tdTom (007914) [16], NSG-SGM3 mice [69], fluorescent reporter lines Rosa26 LSL-N1ICD-IRES-nEGFP, Rosa26LSL-ZsGreen (Ai6), Rosa26LSL-tdTomato (Ai9) [94], Ai9 and Ai96 reporter mouse lines [95], Apoe−/− mice [114], TLR2−/−, mtCATtg, and Duox2−/− mice [115], Syt3 and Syt6 knock-out and Syt5 and Syt10 knock-in quadruple targeted mutation mice (stock no. 008413) [49].

Charles River Laboratories

Charles River has been providing research animals for more than 70 years. It is a supplier of both mouse and rat models, as well as other mammalian models. It is an important supplier for common strains like NIH-Foxn1rnu nude rats [116], Rag1−/− [117], FVB [24], C57BL [49, 117], BALB/c [46, 117], and other strains like Swiss-Webster mice [93], NMRI nude mice [91]. In addition, it provided most CD-1 mice and rat stocks, for example, timed pregnant Sprague Dawley [14] and regular Sprague Dawley [116], Long Evans [118] and Wistar [16], among the publications surveyed.

Taconic Biosciences

Taconic Biosciences has been providing genetically-defined rats and mice for 60 years. In addition to the common strains like C57BL, Taconic provided or generated Plg−/− mice [2], Tg2576 mice [105], LysMgfp/gfp mice [119], 129S6.Cg-Tg(APPSWE)2576Kha N20+ mice [44], germ-free Swiss Webster mice [120] and Long Evans rats [17].

Harlan Laboratories

Its famed breeding facility, Sprague-Dawley farm in Madison, Wisconsin, where the namesake rat strain, Sprague Dawley rat, was initially bred, is now part of Harlan. Harlan supplies Hsd nude mice [121], Dark Agouti rat [122], C57BL mice [61], FVB mouse [123], athymic nude Foxn1-nu mouse [77], and SJL/J mice [124].

Other suppliers

Other suppliers include government agencies such as the NCI Mouse Repository [125] and RIKEN BioResource Research Center [3], organizations like DKFZ animal facility [91], UC Davis Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Center [117, 126], University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) animal facility [127], Frederick Cancer Center / National Cancer Institute, NIH [46, 127], and commercial suppliers like Shanghai Model Organisms [42], Animal

Resources Centre [6], Janvier Laboratories [82] (NOD-SCID [106] ), Envigo [66, 67, 128], Japan Shimizu Laboratory Supplies [17] and SLC [15, 89]. Companies such as GenOway (human VISTA knockin mice [117] ) can also generate transgenic animals on demand.

Web resources - Where to search for a specific mouse strain?
International Mouse Strain Resource (IMSR)

IMSR is a collaboration of a dozen international mouse repositories, containing information for 56,886 strains and 231,033 EC cell lines as of September 2019. For example, here are 130 strains for mouse p53 gene. The website is supported by an NIH grant.

References
  1. Hadjidemetriou M, Rivers Auty J, Papafilippou L, Eales J, Kellett K, Hooper N, et al. Nanoparticle-Enabled Enrichment of Longitudinal Blood Proteomic Fingerprints in Alzheimer's Disease. ACS Nano. 2021;15:7357-7369 pubmed publisher
  2. Silva L, Doyle A, Greenwell Wild T, Dutzan N, Tran C, Abusleme L, et al. Fibrin is a critical regulator of neutrophil effector function at the oral mucosal barrier. Science. 2021;374:eabl5450 pubmed publisher
  3. Mestre H, Du T, Sweeney A, Liu G, Samson A, Peng W, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid influx drives acute ischemic tissue swelling. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  4. Uckelmann H, Kim S, Wong E, Hatton C, Giovinazzo H, Gadrey J, et al. Therapeutic targeting of preleukemia cells in a mouse model of NPM1 mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Science. 2020;367:586-590 pubmed publisher
  5. Dai H, Lan P, Zhao D, Abou Daya K, Liu W, Chen W, et al. PIRs mediate innate myeloid cell memory to nonself MHC molecules. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  6. Chew H, De Lima P, Gonzalez Cruz J, Banushi B, Echejoh G, Hu L, et al. Endocytosis Inhibition in Humans to Improve Responses to ADCC-Mediating Antibodies. Cell. 2020;180:895-914.e27 pubmed publisher
  7. Cantuti Castelvetri L, Ojha R, Pedro L, Djannatian M, Franz J, Kuivanen S, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  8. Kabayama H, Takeuchi M, Tokushige N, Muramatsu S, Kabayama M, Fukuda M, et al. An ultra-stable cytoplasmic antibody engineered for in vivo applications. Nat Commun. 2020;11:336 pubmed publisher
  9. Simões F, Cahill T, Kenyon A, Gavriouchkina D, Vieira J, Sun X, et al. Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. Nat Commun. 2020;11:600 pubmed publisher
  10. Binet F, Cagnone G, Crespo Garcia S, Hata M, Neault M, Dejda A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps target senescent vasculature for tissue remodeling in retinopathy. Science. 2020;369: pubmed publisher
  11. Zhao L, Han X, Lu J, McEachern D, Wang S. A highly potent PROTAC androgen receptor (AR) degrader ARD-61 effectively inhibits AR-positive breast cancer cell growth in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Neoplasia. 2020;22:522-532 pubmed publisher
  12. Siemionow M, Langa P, Brodowska S, Kozlowska K, Zalants K, Budzynska K, et al. Long-Term Protective Effect of Human Dystrophin Expressing Chimeric (DEC) Cell Therapy on Amelioration of Function of Cardiac, Respiratory and Skeletal Muscles in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2022;: pubmed publisher
  13. Yu H, Lu S, Gasior K, Singh D, Vazquez Sanchez S, Tapia O, et al. HSP70 chaperones RNA-free TDP-43 into anisotropic intranuclear liquid spherical shells. Science. 2021;371: pubmed publisher
  14. Cameron L, Tombari R, Lu J, Pell A, Hurley Z, Ehinger Y, et al. A non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analogue with therapeutic potential. Nature. 2021;589:474-479 pubmed publisher
  15. Kataoka N, Shima Y, Nakajima K, Nakamura K. A central master driver of psychosocial stress responses in the rat. Science. 2020;367:1105-1112 pubmed publisher
  16. Duncan A, Heyer M, Ishikawa M, Caligiuri S, Liu X, Chen Z, et al. Habenular TCF7L2 links nicotine addiction to diabetes. Nature. 2019;574:372-377 pubmed publisher
  17. Hirokawa J, Vaughan A, Masset P, Ott T, Kepecs A. Frontal cortex neuron types categorically encode single decision variables. Nature. 2019;576:446-451 pubmed publisher
  18. Kuramoto T, Nakanishi S, Ochiai M, Nakagama H, Voigt B, Serikawa T. Origins of albino and hooded rats: implications from molecular genetic analysis across modern laboratory rat strains. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43059 pubmed publisher
  19. Beermann F, Orlow S, Lamoreux M. The Tyr (albino) locus of the laboratory mouse. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:749-58 pubmed
  20. Luechtefeld T, Marsh D, Rowlands C, Hartung T. Machine learning of toxicological big data enables read-across structure activity relationships (RASAR) outperforming animal test reproducibility. Toxicol Sci. 2018;: pubmed publisher
  21. Beura L, Hamilton S, Bi K, Schenkel J, Odumade O, Casey K, et al. Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice. Nature. 2016;532:512-6 pubmed publisher
  22. Rosshart S, Herz J, Vassallo B, Hunter A, Wall M, Badger J, et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science. 2019;365: pubmed publisher
  23. International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Available from: www.mousephenotype.org/
  24. Strickley J, Messerschmidt J, Awad M, Li T, Hasegawa T, Ha D, et al. Immunity to commensal papillomaviruses protects against skin cancer. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  25. Szonyi A, Sos K, Nyilas R, Schlingloff D, Domonkos A, Takács V, et al. Brainstem nucleus incertus controls contextual memory formation. Science. 2019;364: pubmed publisher
  26. Zott B, Simon M, Hong W, Unger F, Chen Engerer H, Frosch M, et al. A vicious cycle of β amyloid-dependent neuronal hyperactivation. Science. 2019;365:559-565 pubmed publisher
  27. Louveau A, Smirnov I, Keyes T, Eccles J, Rouhani S, Peske J, et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. 2015;523:337-41 pubmed publisher
  28. Victora G, Schwickert T, Fooksman D, Kamphorst A, Meyer Hermann M, Dustin M, et al. Germinal center dynamics revealed by multiphoton microscopy with a photoactivatable fluorescent reporter. Cell. 2010;143:592-605 pubmed publisher
  29. Mahajan V, Demissie E, Mattoo H, Viswanadham V, Varki A, Morris R, et al. Striking Immune Phenotypes in Gene-Targeted Mice Are Driven by a Copy-Number Variant Originating from a Commercially Available C57BL/6 Strain. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1901-9 pubmed publisher
  30. Simon M, Greenaway S, White J, Fuchs H, Gailus Durner V, Wells S, et al. A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R82 pubmed publisher
  31. Pettitt S, Liang Q, Rairdan X, Moran J, Prosser H, Beier D, et al. Agouti C57BL/6N embryonic stem cells for mouse genetic resources. Nat Methods. 2009;6:493-5 pubmed publisher
  32. Skarnes W, Rosen B, West A, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature. 2011;474:337-42 pubmed publisher
  33. Waterston R, Lindblad Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril J, Agarwal P, et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420:520-62 pubmed
  34. Lein E, Hawrylycz M, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, Bernard A, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168-76 pubmed
  35. Mekada K, Abe K, Murakami A, Nakamura S, Nakata H, Moriwaki K, et al. Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. Exp Anim. 2009;58:141-9 pubmed
  36. Bryant C, Zhang N, Sokoloff G, Fanselow M, Ennes H, Palmer A, et al. Behavioral differences among C57BL/6 substrains: implications for transgenic and knockout studies. J Neurogenet. 2008;22:315-31 pubmed publisher
  37. Kumar V, Kim K, Joseph C, Kourrich S, Yoo S, Huang H, et al. C57BL/6N mutation in cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2 regulates cocaine response. Science. 2013;342:1508-12 pubmed publisher
  38. Freeman H, Hugill A, Dear N, Ashcroft F, Cox R. Deletion of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase: a new quantitive trait locus accounting for glucose intolerance in C57BL/6J mice. Diabetes. 2006;55:2153-6 pubmed
  39. Toye A, Lippiat J, Proks P, Shimomura K, Bentley L, Hugill A, et al. A genetic and physiological study of impaired glucose homeostasis control in C57BL/6J mice. Diabetologia. 2005;48:675-86 pubmed
  40. Holth J, Fritschi S, Wang C, Pedersen N, Cirrito J, Mahan T, et al. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science. 2019;363:880-884 pubmed publisher
  41. Motta A, Berning M, Boergens K, Staffler B, Beining M, Loomba S, et al. Dense connectomic reconstruction in layer 4 of the somatosensory cortex. Science. 2019;366: pubmed publisher
  42. Zhang T, Xu D, Trefts E, Lv M, Inuzuka H, Song G, et al. Metabolic orchestration of cell death by AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of RIPK1. Science. 2023;380:1372-1380 pubmed publisher
  43. Becattini S, Littmann E, Seok R, Amoretti L, Fontana E, Wright R, et al. Enhancing mucosal immunity by transient microbiota depletion. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4475 pubmed publisher
  44. Faraco G, Hochrainer K, Segarra S, Schaeffer S, Santisteban M, Menon A, et al. Dietary salt promotes cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  45. Brigidi G, Hayes M, Delos Santos N, Hartzell A, Texari L, Lin P, et al. Genomic Decoding of Neuronal Depolarization by Stimulus-Specific NPAS4 Heterodimers. Cell. 2019;179:373-391.e27 pubmed publisher
  46. Mauffrey P, Tchitchek N, Barroca V, Bemelmans A, Firlej V, Allory Y, et al. Progenitors from the central nervous system drive neurogenesis in cancer. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  47. Ali R, Gandhi A, Meng H, Yalavarthi S, Vreede A, Estes S, et al. Adenosine receptor agonism protects against NETosis and thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1916 pubmed publisher
  48. Vodnala S, Eil R, Kishton R, Sukumar M, Yamamoto T, Ha N, et al. T cell stemness and dysfunction in tumors are triggered by a common mechanism. Science. 2019;363: pubmed publisher
  49. Awasthi A, Ramachandran B, Ahmed S, Benito E, Shinoda Y, Nitzan N, et al. Synaptotagmin-3 drives AMPA receptor endocytosis, depression of synapse strength, and forgetting. Science. 2019;363: pubmed publisher
  50. Kam T, Mao X, Park H, Chou S, Karuppagounder S, Umanah G, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) drives pathologic α-synuclein neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Science. 2018;362: pubmed publisher
  51. Zullo J, Drake D, Aron L, O Hern P, Dhamne S, Davidsohn N, et al. Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST. Nature. 2019;574:359-364 pubmed publisher
  52. Segarra M, Aburto M, Cop F, Llaó Cid C, Härtl R, Damm M, et al. Endothelial Dab1 signaling orchestrates neuro-glia-vessel communication in the central nervous system. Science. 2018;361: pubmed publisher
  53. Chopra S, Giovanelli P, Alvarado Vazquez P, Alonso S, Song M, Sandoval T, et al. IRE1α-XBP1 signaling in leukocytes controls prostaglandin biosynthesis and pain. Science. 2019;365: pubmed publisher
  54. Li L, Lai F, Hu X, Liu B, Lu X, Lin Z, et al. Multifaceted SOX2-chromatin interaction underpins pluripotency progression in early embryos. Science. 2023;382:eadi5516 pubmed publisher
  55. Xia W, Xu J, Yu G, Yao G, Xu K, Ma X, et al. Resetting histone modifications during human parental-to-zygotic transition. Science. 2019;365:353-360 pubmed publisher
  56. Hsu C, Lin W, Seshasayee D, Chen Y, Ding X, Lin Z, et al. Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 3 deficiency perturbs lysosome function and macrophage homeostasis. Science. 2012;335:89-92 pubmed publisher
  57. Lamming D, Ye L, Katajisto P, Goncalves M, Saitoh M, Stevens D, et al. Rapamycin-induced insulin resistance is mediated by mTORC2 loss and uncoupled from longevity. Science. 2012;335:1638-43 pubmed publisher
  58. Chawla G, Viswanathan P, Devi S. Phycotoxicity of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1988;15:119-24 pubmed
  59. Hang S, Paik D, Yao L, Kim E, Jamma T, Lu J, et al. Bile acid metabolites control TH17 and Treg cell differentiation. Nature. 2019;576:143-148 pubmed publisher
  60. Ciccone R, Franco C, Piccialli I, Boscia F, Casamassa A, de Rosa V, et al. Amyloid β-Induced Upregulation of Nav1.6 Underlies Neuronal Hyperactivity in Tg2576 Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13592 pubmed publisher
  61. Antebi Y, Reich Zeliger S, Hart Y, Mayo A, Eizenberg I, Rimer J, et al. Mapping differentiation under mixed culture conditions reveals a tunable continuum of T cell fates. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001616 pubmed publisher
  62. Wang L, Wen M, Cao X. Nuclear hnRNPA2B1 initiates and amplifies the innate immune response to DNA viruses. Science. 2019;365: pubmed publisher
  63. Persson E, Verstraete K, Heyndrickx I, Gevaert E, Aegerter H, Percier J, et al. Protein crystallization promotes type 2 immunity and is reversible by antibody treatment. Science. 2019;364: pubmed publisher
  64. de Laval B, Maurizio J, Kandalla P, Brisou G, Simonnet L, Huber C, et al. C/EBPβ-Dependent Epigenetic Memory Induces Trained Immunity in Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:657-674.e8 pubmed publisher
  65. Noda S, Kawashima N, Yamamoto M, Hashimoto K, Nara K, Sekiya I, et al. Effect of cell culture density on dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells with reference to osteogenic differentiation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5430 pubmed publisher
  66. Dominy S, LYNCH C, Ermini F, Benedyk M, Marczyk A, Konradi A, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer's disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaau3333 pubmed publisher
  67. Moro A, Driscoll T, Boraas L, Armero W, Kasper D, Baeyens N, et al. MicroRNA-dependent regulation of biomechanical genes establishes tissue stiffness homeostasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:348-358 pubmed publisher
  68. De Cecco M, Ito T, Petrashen A, Elias A, Skvir N, Criscione S, et al. L1 drives IFN in senescent cells and promotes age-associated inflammation. Nature. 2019;566:73-78 pubmed publisher
  69. Maun H, Jackman J, Choy D, Loyet K, Staton T, Jia G, et al. An Allosteric Anti-tryptase Antibody for the Treatment of Mast Cell-Mediated Severe Asthma. Cell. 2019;179:417-431.e19 pubmed publisher
  70. Nordmann G, Malkemper E, Landler L, Ushakova L, Nimpf S, Heinen R, et al. A high sensitivity ZENK monoclonal antibody to map neuronal activity in Aves. Sci Rep. 2020;10:915 pubmed publisher
  71. Oliveira G, Lieberman J, Barillas Mury C. Epithelial nitration by a peroxidase/NOX5 system mediates mosquito antiplasmodial immunity. Science. 2012;335:856-9 pubmed publisher
  72. Jagger B, Wise H, Kash J, Walters K, Wills N, Xiao Y, et al. An overlapping protein-coding region in influenza A virus segment 3 modulates the host response. Science. 2012;337:199-204 pubmed publisher
  73. Ekiert D, Friesen R, Bhabha G, Kwaks T, Jongeneelen M, Yu W, et al. A highly conserved neutralizing epitope on group 2 influenza A viruses. Science. 2011;333:843-50 pubmed publisher
  74. Besse A, Besse L, Kraus M, Mendez Lopez M, Bader J, Xin B, et al. Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma: Head-to-Head Comparison of Currently Available Proteasome Inhibitors. Cell Chem Biol. 2019;26:340-351.e3 pubmed publisher
  75. Singh D, Chan J, Zoppoli P, Niola F, Sullivan R, Castaño A, et al. Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma. Science. 2012;337:1231-5 pubmed publisher
  76. Yi W, Clark P, Mason D, Keenan M, Hill C, Goddard W, et al. Phosphofructokinase 1 glycosylation regulates cell growth and metabolism. Science. 2012;337:975-80 pubmed publisher
  77. Kessler J, Kahle K, Sun T, Meerbrey K, Schlabach M, Schmitt E, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Science. 2012;335:348-53 pubmed publisher
  78. Chia R, Achilli F, Festing M, Fisher E. The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1181-6 pubmed
  79. Luther A, Urfer M, Zahn M, Müller M, Wang S, Mondal M, et al. Chimeric peptidomimetic antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  80. Labonte B, Abdallah K, Maussion G, Yerko V, Yang J, Bittar T, et al. Regulation of impulsive and aggressive behaviours by a novel lncRNA. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  81. Patzke C, Brockmann M, Dai J, Gan K, Grauel M, Fenske P, et al. Neuromodulator Signaling Bidirectionally Controls Vesicle Numbers in Human Synapses. Cell. 2019;179:498-513.e22 pubmed publisher
  82. Eaton J, Furst L, Ruberto R, Moosmayer D, Hilpmann A, Ryan M, et al. Selective covalent targeting of GPX4 using masked nitrile-oxide electrophiles. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  83. Takeda K, Kojima Y, Ikejima K, Harada K, Yamashina S, Okumura K, et al. Death receptor 5 mediated-apoptosis contributes to cholestatic liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10895-900 pubmed publisher
  84. Losick V, Stephan K, Smirnova I, Isberg R, Poltorak A. A hemidominant Naip5 allele in mouse strain MOLF/Ei-derived macrophages restricts Legionella pneumophila intracellular growth. Infect Immun. 2009;77:196-204 pubmed publisher
  85. Sanders C, Franchi L, Yarovinsky F, Uematsu S, Akira S, Nunez G, et al. Induction of adaptive immunity by flagellin does not require robust activation of innate immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:359-71 pubmed publisher
  86. Neunuebel M, Chen Y, Gaspar A, Backlund P, Yergey A, Machner M. De-AMPylation of the small GTPase Rab1 by the pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Science. 2011;333:453-6 pubmed publisher
  87. Rice M, O Brien S. Genetic variance of laboratory outbred Swiss mice. Nature. 1980;283:157-61 pubmed
  88. Eaton G, Johnson F, Custer R, Crane A. The Icr:Ha(ICR) mouse: a current account of breeding, mutations, diseases and mortality. Lab Anim. 1980;14:17-24 pubmed
  89. Nagamatsu G, Shimamoto S, Hamazaki N, Nishimura Y, Hayashi K. Mechanical stress accompanied with nuclear rotation is involved in the dormant state of mouse oocytes. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav9960 pubmed publisher
  90. Karthaus W, Hofree M, Choi D, Linton E, Turkekul M, Bejnood A, et al. Regenerative potential of prostate luminal cells revealed by single-cell analysis. Science. 2020;368:497-505 pubmed publisher
  91. Venkataramani V, Tanev D, Strahle C, Studier Fischer A, Fankhauser L, Kessler T, et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature. 2019;573:532-538 pubmed publisher
  92. Skokos D, Waite J, Haber L, Crawford A, Hermann A, Ullman E, et al. A class of costimulatory CD28-bispecific antibodies that enhance the antitumor activity of CD3-bispecific antibodies. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12: pubmed publisher
  93. Aubert M, Strongin D, Roychoudhury P, Loprieno M, Haick A, Klouser L, et al. Gene editing and elimination of latent herpes simplex virus in vivo. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4148 pubmed publisher
  94. Ouadah Y, Rojas E, Riordan D, Capostagno S, Kuo C, Krasnow M. Rare Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cells Are Stem Cells Regulated by Rb, p53, and Notch. Cell. 2019;179:403-416.e23 pubmed publisher
  95. Zhang J, Jin H, Zhang W, Ding C, O Keeffe S, Ye M, et al. Sour Sensing from the Tongue to the Brain. Cell. 2019;179:392-402.e15 pubmed publisher
  96. Jacome L, Burket J, Herndon A, Deutsch S. Genetically inbred Balb/c mice differ from outbred Swiss Webster mice on discrete measures of sociability: relevance to a genetic mouse model of autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2011;4:393-400 pubmed publisher
  97. Noristani H, They L, Perrin F. C57BL/6 and Swiss Webster Mice Display Differences in Mobility, Gliosis, Microcavity Formation and Lesion Volume After Severe Spinal Cord Injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:173 pubmed publisher
  98. Brosnan Watters G, Ogimi T, Ford D, Tatekawa L, Gilliam D, Bilsky E, et al. Differential effects of MK-801 on cerebrocortical neuronal injury in C57BL/6J, NSA, and ICR mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2000;24:925-38 pubmed
  99. Adams B, Fitch T, Chaney S, Gerlai R. Altered performance characteristics in cognitive tasks: comparison of the albino ICR and CD1 mouse strains. Behav Brain Res. 2002;133:351-61 pubmed
  100. Sher S. Tumors in control mice: literature tabulation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1974;30:337-59 pubmed
  101. Kitchen P, Salman M, Halsey A, Clarke Bland C, MacDonald J, Ishida H, et al. Targeting Aquaporin-4 Subcellular Localization to Treat Central Nervous System Edema. Cell. 2020;181:784-799.e19 pubmed publisher
  102. Lundby A, Franciosa G, Emdal K, Refsgaard J, Gnosa S, Bekker Jensen D, et al. Oncogenic Mutations Rewire Signaling Pathways by Switching Protein Recruitment to Phosphotyrosine Sites. Cell. 2019;179:543-560.e26 pubmed publisher
  103. Silva M, Nandi G, Tentarelli S, Gurrell I, Jamier T, Lucente D, et al. Prolonged tau clearance and stress vulnerability rescue by pharmacological activation of autophagy in tauopathy neurons. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3258 pubmed publisher
  104. Modi B, Neustadter J, Binda E, Lewis J, Filler R, Roberts S, et al. Langerhans cells facilitate epithelial DNA damage and squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2012;335:104-8 pubmed publisher
  105. Nakamura T, Oh C, Liao L, Zhang X, Lopez K, Gibbs D, et al. Noncanonical transnitrosylation network contributes to synapse loss in Alzheimer's disease. Science. 2021;371: pubmed publisher
  106. Zewinger S, Reiser J, Jankowski V, Alansary D, Hahm E, Triem S, et al. Apolipoprotein C3 induces inflammation and organ damage by alternative inflammasome activation. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:30-41 pubmed publisher
  107. Gate D, Saligrama N, Leventhal O, Yang A, Unger M, Middeldorp J, et al. Clonally expanded CD8 T cells patrol the cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2020;577:399-404 pubmed publisher
  108. Calvanese V, Nguyen A, Bolan T, Vavilina A, Su T, Lee L, et al. MLLT3 governs human haematopoietic stem-cell self-renewal and engraftment. Nature. 2019;576:281-286 pubmed publisher
  109. Venkatesh H, Morishita W, Geraghty A, Silverbush D, Gillespie S, Arzt M, et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature. 2019;573:539-545 pubmed publisher
  110. Gil Cruz C, Perez Shibayama C, De Martin A, Ronchi F, Van der Borght K, Niederer R, et al. Microbiota-derived peptide mimics drive lethal inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Science. 2019;366:881-886 pubmed publisher
  111. Zhu P, Khatiwada S, Cui Y, Reineke L, Dooling S, Kim J, et al. Activation of the ISR mediates the behavioral and neurophysiological abnormalities in Down syndrome. Science. 2019;366:843-849 pubmed publisher
  112. de Morrée A, Klein J, Gan Q, Farup J, Urtasun A, Kanugovi A, et al. Alternative polyadenylation of Pax3 controls muscle stem cell fate and muscle function. Science. 2019;366:734-738 pubmed publisher
  113. Leone R, Zhao L, Englert J, Sun I, Oh M, Sun I, et al. Glutamine blockade induces divergent metabolic programs to overcome tumor immune evasion. Science. 2019;366:1013-1021 pubmed publisher
  114. Silvestre Roig C, Braster Q, Wichapong K, LEE E, Teulon J, Berrebeh N, et al. Externalized histone H4 orchestrates chronic inflammation by inducing lytic cell death. Nature. 2019;569:236-240 pubmed publisher
  115. Herb M, Gluschko A, Wiegmann K, Farid A, Wolf A, Utermöhlen O, et al. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species enable proinflammatory signaling through disulfide linkage of NEMO. Sci Signal. 2019;12: pubmed publisher
  116. Han E, Qian H, Jiang B, Figetakis M, Kosyakova N, Tellides G, et al. A therapeutic vascular conduit to support in vivo cell-secreted therapy. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:40 pubmed publisher
  117. ElTanbouly M, Zhao Y, Nowak E, Li J, Schaafsma E, Le Mercier I, et al. VISTA is a checkpoint regulator for naïve T cell quiescence and peripheral tolerance. Science. 2020;367: pubmed publisher
  118. Kim J, Gulati T, Ganguly K. Competing Roles of Slow Oscillations and Delta Waves in Memory Consolidation versus Forgetting. Cell. 2019;179:514-526.e13 pubmed publisher
  119. Freeman S, Uderhardt S, Saric A, Collins R, Buckley C, Mylvaganam S, et al. Lipid-gated monovalent ion fluxes regulate endocytic traffic and support immune surveillance. Science. 2020;367:301-305 pubmed publisher
  120. Guo C, Allen B, Hiam K, Dodd D, Van Treuren W, Higginbottom S, et al. Depletion of microbiome-derived molecules in the host using Clostridium genetics. Science. 2019;366: pubmed publisher
  121. Paprotka T, Delviks Frankenberry K, Cingöz O, Martinez A, Kung H, Tepper C, et al. Recombinant origin of the retrovirus XMRV. Science. 2011;333:97-101 pubmed publisher
  122. Vann S. Dismantling the Papez circuit for memory in rats. elife. 2013;2:e00736 pubmed publisher
  123. Klohn P, Farmer M, Linehan J, O Malley C, Fernández de Marco M, Taylor W, et al. PrP antibodies do not trigger mouse hippocampal neuron apoptosis. Science. 2012;335:52 pubmed publisher
  124. Hou W, Kang H, Kim B. Th17 cells enhance viral persistence and inhibit T cell cytotoxicity in a model of chronic virus infection. J Exp Med. 2009;206:313-28 pubmed publisher
  125. Lee Y, Chen M, Lee J, Zhang J, Lin S, Fu T, et al. Reactivation of PTEN tumor suppressor for cancer treatment through inhibition of a MYC-WWP1 inhibitory pathway. Science. 2019;364: pubmed publisher
  126. Grüneboom A, Hawwari I, Weidner D, Culemann S, Müller S, Henneberg S, et al. A network of trans-cortical capillaries as mainstay for blood circulation in long bones. Nat Metab. 2019;1:236-250 pubmed publisher
  127. DiToro D, Winstead C, Pham D, Witte S, Andargachew R, Singer J, et al. Differential IL-2 expression defines developmental fates of follicular versus nonfollicular helper T cells. Science. 2018;361: pubmed publisher
  128. Tornabene P, Trapani I, Minopoli R, Centrulo M, Lupo M, de Simone S, et al. Intein-mediated protein trans-splicing expands adeno-associated virus transfer capacity in the retina. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11: pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139