Killifish
Christie HV Taylor (cht4 at cornell dot edu)
Merrimack, New Hampshire, USA
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.7.2156
Date
last modified : 2022-12-16; original version : 2017-02-28
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2017;7:2156
Abstract

Killifish are one of the model organisms in fields like biogerontology, environmental toxicology, and metabolism. Their short lifespan, fecundity, and easy maintenance make them ideal vertebrates for laboratory research studies. This article addresses common strains, methods and applications for killifish in research settings.

Introduction

Killifish inhabit brackish and fresh waters in the Americas, Europe, Asia and Africa. These oviparous cypriniform fishes are often brightly colored, highly active and typically measure 2.5-5 cm long, but range from 8 mm to 35 centimeters at maturity. Many species of killifish inhabit permanent streams, rivers and lakes and live for up to three years, but some more species of killifish inhabit vernal pools that last for only a few days, weeks or months before drying up completely. These annual killifishes risk extinction, due to habitat loss, restricted distribution, and low dispersal of most species, in countries like Brazil [6]. The killifish rely on diapause as an integral part of their breeding cycles. Diapause, a physiological state of dormancy, occurs in the egg stage after laying and is characterized by slowed metabolism, decreased heart rate and reduced oxygen consumption [7] and is regulated through temperature-dependent vitamin D signaling [8]. These survival mechanisms are echoed in other species of killifish through evolution and speciation events as some adult killifish can survive out of water for several weeks and others can survive extreme cold and anoxia [9, 10].

Names Eggs* Frequency** Gestation*** Lifespan Space**** (liters/ breeding pair) References
Annual killifish, Austrofundulus limnaeus20-30variable45 days1.5 years5.6 [11, 12]
Mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus10-30010 days2 weeks4 years4 [13-15]
Mangrove killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus15-402-3 weeks14-20 days8 years9.4 [16, 17]
Trinidadian killifish, Rivulus hartii5-15 per dayOccurs over several days every 4-6 months10-14 days3 years3.5 [18, 19]
Turqoise killifish, Nothibranchius furzeri30-50variable17 days-3 years9 months10GRZ strain [20, 21], MZCS‐08/122 [22]
Medaka, Japanese killifish or ricefish, Oryzias latipes107 weeks10-12 days4 years8 [22-24]
Table 1. Breeding details for commonly used killifish species. *The average number of eggs produced during spawning. ** Typical frequency of spawning. *** Length of egg incubation prior to hatching. ****Average space requirements.

Killifish have been used as model organisms for over a decade. Some species of killifish display high resistance to environmental toxins that developed quickly over the last 50-60 years. Their resistance to toxins has made them appealing to researchers who seek answers to surviving in an increasingly polluted planet and in harsh environmental conditions. For example, Oziolor EM et al identifed an introgressed aryl hydrocarbon receptor locus in Gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis) from Atlantic killifish (F. heteroclitus) that enhanced the survival of Gulf killifish in polluted habitats [25]. Short-lived species inhabiting ephemeral ponds attracted attention from scientists who seek clues to metabolism and aging [26-28].

The short lifespans of the killifish relative to mammals made them ideal for research. Their fecundity, short gestation, prolonged incubation of eggs, minimal space and energy requirements and trivial maintenance makes them ideal for the sterile conditions of the laboratory. The genes of these animals can also be easily manipulated [1], and eggs can be safely stored, transported or used immediately. Medium-throughput assays developed for whole organisms can be easily applied to the products of these processes [29].

Mammalian models are more likely to call research into more intense scrutiny by internal review boards (IRBs), and their maintenance and care are much more involved than fish models. Killifish are low-maintenance and can be used to study disease and other processes in either the whole fish or in organ systems. Sexually mature as early as 17 days from hatching, female killifish can lay between 10 and 20 eggs a day with a recorded maximum of 100 [30]. Killifish eggs can be incubated for as little as six weeks or as long as eight months depending on the species and storage conditions. This might seem like a drawback relative to mice (about 20 days gestation) and rats (up to 25 days), but the number of eggs means that many batches from a single spawning event can be revived at any time during that incubation period for experimentation. Research has also suggested that modeling human diseases in rodents robs researchers of insight unique to human cells; however, tissue cultures can involve more maintenance at a higher cost than fish models [31]. Waste products from killifish are also more environmentally friendly; dirty water can usually be discarded into the sanitary sewer. Killifish can be used alongside or as alternatives to other conventional models like those discussed above [32].

Killifish  figure 1
Figure 1. CRISPR/Cas9 gene modification in killifish. A. DNA oligos complementary to the target sequence are used to make gRNA. B. These gRNAs are injected into the fertilized egg (measures ~1mm) along with Cas9 mRNA after it has been embedded in an agarose trench or in low melt agar. Injection of phenol red dye helps visualize the blastodisc. C. Fish mature after approximately 20 days and are available for optional backcross [1].

All these features make killifish an excellent option for researchers seeking to study neurogenesis [22], metabolism, biogerontology and evolutionary adaptations to pollution and harsh climate.

Equipment and Methodology

There are more than 1270 species of killifish, but only a few are used in laboratory research. Typically, killifish used for research are either wild caught for population and environmental studies or are specific strains that are exchanged between laboratories. Some of the more commonly studied strains are listed in Table 1 along with relevant statistics about husbandry.

Killifish  figure 2
Figure 2. Construct for Tet-ON promoter. A. Tetracycline binds to the translated rtTA protein. B. rtTA binds to the Tet-op promoter resulting in transcription of the gene of interest. Binding only occurs in the presence of the tetracycline, though with some constructs, leaky transcription may occur. Figure adapted from [2].

Annual killifish are typically used to study metabolism, mitochondrial metabolism and physiological responses to stress conditions due to their remarkable tolerance for low oxygen conditions. Mummichog also has a high tolerance for stressful environmental conditions like anoxia, hypoxia, larger temperature fluctuations and changes in salinity. These qualities make mummichog useful for studies in metabolism, physiological responses to stress and toxins and even the plasticity of their mitochondrial genomes. Mangrove killifish are typically used to study evolution and are amphibious and hermaphroditic. Similarly, the Trinidadian killifish are also used for studies in evolution and behavior. Trinidadian killifish are usually studied in the wild or are wild-caught and studied in the lab.

In contrast, turquoise killifish are used to study aging and age-related diseases [33]. Their short lifespans and ease of husbandry make them ideal for this area of research. Medaka has remarkably small genomes, and many lines of inbred strains are available. These strains are used to study neurotoxicology, ecotoxicology, carcinogenesis, and disruption of endocrine systems [34-36].

Some of these strains have been studied extensively. Medaka, the Japanese killifish, has been subjected to systematic target-selected mutagenesis to produce a library of gene knockout models [37]. In addition to broad bodies of literature, searchable genomes have been published for mummichog, medaka and the turquoise killifish [3, 38-40].

Typically, these animals can be kept in small containers like plastic cups, though some more sophisticated setups include automated filtration. Breeding typically requires larger setups. Automatic water filters reduce the amount of time required for maintenance for a nominal initial investment. Except for hermaphroditic species, breeding pairs are kept together overnight in a container where each fish is separated by a barrier that allows each animal to see and share water with the other. After several hours of introduction, the barrier is removed, and the two interact directly. Females spawn either on a mop of dark-colored acrylic yarn or peat moss. Both of these materials are easy to sterilize beforehand and allow easy visualization of the eggs. It can be difficult to enumerate the eggs without removing each one from the substrate, but this step makes desiccation before incubation much easier [41].

Killifish  figure 3
Figure 3. In vitro CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA synthesis. A. DNA oligos are hybridized to ligated genomic target sequences for amplification. B. Targets are amplified via PCR. C. Complimentary DNA sequences are purified and ready for amplification using T7 RNA polymerase. D. Resulting cleaned products are ready for injection with Cas9 mRNA. Figure adapted from [3].
Techniques for manipulating genes
Transplantation

Many of the techniques used for injecting chemical and genetic materials into killifish eggs are adapted from another popular vertebrate model, zebrafish (Danio rerio). Microinjection techniques using glass pipettes deliver materials through the sturdy chorion of killifish eggs (Figure 1). Killifish eggs have a tough chorion relative to zebrafish so a shorter needle can be used to inject materials into the egg, as described by Hartmann et al Typically, materials are injected into the blastodisc as it divides and backcross is performed later for a clean strain. If a chimeric animal is desired, then materials are injected into specific cells in the dividing blastosphere. Allografting in adult animals should take into account circadian rhythms affecting possible immune responses as shown by Nevid et al [42-44].

Method Added genetic component Mode of action References
Cre/LoxPEndogenous**Insertional mutagenesis [45]
CRISPR/Cas9Exogenous*Insertional mutagenesis; non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR) [1]
N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosurea (ENU)NoneRandom chemical mutagenesis [46]
LaserEndogenous**Constitutive on/off [37]
RNAiNonePost-transcriptional regulation [47]
Tet-on/offExogenous* or endogenous**Constitutive on/off [1]
Tol2Exogenous* and endogenous**Insertional mutagenesis [20, 21]
UVNoneRandom mutagenesis via DSB DNA repair mechanisms [48]
X-rayNoneRandom mutagenesis via DSB repair mechanisms [49]
Table 2. Methods for gene modification and control in vertebrate fish models. *Plasmid and possibly non-persistent. ** Chromosomal and likely persistent.

CRISPR/cas9 is popular for manipulating genes in killifish because it allows targeted insertion and knock-out of genes. In this method, carefully designed RNA that reflect the changes a researcher wishes to make to the killifish genome (gRNA) are injected along with RNA encoding the machinery necessary for altering the DNA. Harel et al have described these techniques in great detail, but several papers have been written describing the process [1, 3, 20].

Killifish  figure 4
Figure 4. Example of fluorescent antibody use and microscopy in mummichog killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus). These ionocytes show the distribution of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and with no lysine kinase (WNK1). Top figure: This image shows an x-z scan; it is a side view of a saltwater ionocyte (ic) with a stained accessory cell (ac). The white bar shows 5 µm for scale. The CFTR (A) is present in the apical crypt (ap), while the rest of the ionocyte and the accessory cells stained strongly for WNK1 phosphoantibody (B and C). Bottom figure: A drawing that models the distribution CFTR and WNK1 distribution in mummichog ionocytes (n: nucleus, pvc: pavement cell layer). Description adapted from correspondence with Regina Cozzi who generously supplied her images. Her work is conducted with WS Marshall and is funded by NSERC grant RGPIN 3698-2000.

In order for materials to be injected into the killifish eggs, eggs must be stabilized. Killifish eggs can either be bound in trenches molded into conventional agar or by embedding the eggs in low-melting temperature agar. Delicate zebrafish embryos are usually secured in an agarose trench for injection and this technique can also be used for killifish eggs, but embedding killifish eggs in low-melt agarose did not affect the viability of the embryos according to data [50]. Depending on when and where the embryos are injected, researchers have control over how and when genes of interest are expressed [50].

Transgenic techniques, targeted mutagenesis and recombination

A broad variety of conditional and constitutive gene regulation are available for killifish. Conditional in vivo gene regulation using Tet-ON as shown in Figure 2, Cre/loxP, Gal4 upstream activation sequence and laser have been described as alternatives to heat-shock for localized gene expression and either have or will be adopted for use in killifish [2]. Colored fluorescent proteins have also been described for use in tracking protein expression in vivo in killifish [51].

Genetic manipulation techniques using directed and random mutagenesis are available using now commonly available tools like CRISPR or transposons as shown in Figure 3 [52]. Harel et al recommend an online tool, CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.rc.fas.harvard.edu), to predict gRNA targets though many vendors offer similar tools. These software programs use genomic data to predict targets that include the necessary 3-nucleotide sequence motif (NNG) on the gRNA and the protospacer adjustment motif (PAM) downstream in the target DNA. These allow the Cas9 protein to bind and alter DNA as desired and designed by researchers.

Killifish  figure 5
Figure 5. qPCR as a method for assessing DNA damage in killifish. A. Animals or eggs can be treated with chemicals, radiation, conditional gene expression. B. DNA can be collected at desired time points or in single batches and quantified. C. qPCR and subsequent quantification via determination of densitometry in agarose after electrophoresis. D - E. Lesion frequency calculation f(x)=e-λ λ / X ! Poisson expression. Zero Class: f(0)=e- λ; λ – lesion frequency; AD = amplification of damaged template; AO = Amplification of non-damaged template; Lesion frequency / genomic strand: λ = -ln AD / AO. Figure adapted from [4, 5].

Transposon-mediated transgenesis is a similarly successful method for manipulating killifish genes as described [52]. Cao C et al co-injected a transgenic vector and transposase mRNA into one-cell-stage N. furzeri embryos to generate transgenic lines [53]. Table 2 lists methods for gene modification described for use in fish vertebrate models. All of these techniques offer a robust and almost universally accepted method for studying changes in homeostasis including the addition of human genes [1, 52].

Observing gene function and aging

Once genes have been modified, researchers must track and quantify the relevant phenomena. Because many varieties of carefully constructed colored fluorescent proteins are available for use in laboratory experiments [54], there are many opportunities to track gene expression in vivo. The insertional mutagenesis systems described in Table 2 allow researchers to add colored tags and subsequently track gene expression during development or ageing and under stress conditions. This will enable researchers to monitor protein expression in vivo and throughout the organism's entire lifespan [4, 5, 5, 54-56]. The short lifespan, along with the presence of physiological systems unique to the vertebrate, such as adaptive immune system or the hypothalamic‐pituitary axis, enable the killifish to be an excellent model for aging research [57].

Interfering with gene function

Disrupting gene function is a valuable technique for studying aging and other phenomena in killifish. Typically, the aforementioned methods for manipulating genes are used, but when metabolism is more relevant sometimes methods for activating inserted genes without hormones, sugars or other materials that might unduly influence metabolism are more appropriate. Radiation, non-hormonal oxidative stressors and other chemicals can be used in these studies [28]. Table 2 lists several non-genetic ways to interfere with biological processes in killifish. Perturbing homeostasis without the potential of a confounding biological variable can yield unique insight into biological processes [4, 5, 58].

Monitoring cells with stains and qPCR

Fluorescent dyes can also be used to visualize cells either on their own or using antibodies. Confocal and fluorescent microscopy can create stunning 3-dimensional models and informative images as shown in Figure 4. These cells were stained with AlexaFluor secondary antibodies after being fixed, but there are many available dyes and stains [59].

DNA damage can also be tracked using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) protocol adapted for use in killifish [5]. This technique offers a quantitative assay for multiple tissue types after exposure to chemical mutagens and radiation. DNA from treated animals is collected, quantified, subjected to qPCR to assess DNA damage and then analyzed using Poisson distribution as shown in Figure 5 [4, 5, 55]. This technique allows researchers to precisely monitor DNA damage in real time.

References
  1. Harel I, Valenzano D, Brunet A. Efficient genome engineering approaches for the short-lived African turquoise killifish. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:2010-2028 pubmed publisher
  2. Kim Y, Nam H, Valenzano D. The short-lived African turquoise killifish: an emerging experimental model for ageing. Dis Model Mech. 2016;9:115-29 pubmed publisher
  3. Cellerino A, Valenzano D, Reichard M. From the bush to the bench: the annual Nothobranchius fishes as a new model system in biology. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016;91:511-33 pubmed publisher
  4. Ayala Torres S, Chen Y, Svoboda T, Rosenblatt J, Van Houten B. Analysis of gene-specific DNA damage and repair using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Methods. 2000;22:135-47 pubmed
  5. Santos J, Meyer J, Mandavilli B, Van Houten B. Quantitative PCR-based measurement of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage and repair in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;314:183-99 pubmed
  6. Volcan M, Lanés L. Brazilian killifishes risk extinction. Science. 2018;361:340-341 pubmed publisher
  7. Dance A. Live fast, die young. Nature. 2016;535:453-5 pubmed publisher
  8. Romney A, Davis E, Corona M, Wagner J, Podrabsky J. Temperature-dependent vitamin D signaling regulates developmental trajectory associated with diapause in an annual killifish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:12763-12768 pubmed publisher
  9. Riggs C, Woll S, Podrabsky J. MitosRNAs and extreme anoxia tolerance in embryos of the annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. Sci Rep. 2019;9:19812 pubmed publisher
  10. Podrabsky J, Wilson N. Hypoxia and Anoxia Tolerance in the Annual Killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. Integr Comp Biol. 2016;56:500-9 pubmed publisher
  11. Podrabsky J, Clelen D, Crawshaw L. Temperature preference and reproductive fitness of the annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus exposed to constant and fluctuating temperatures. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008;194:385-93 pubmed publisher
  12. Egami N. The medaka, Oryzias latipes (teleost fish) as a laboratory animal. Jikken Dobutsu. 1973;22 Suppl:109-14 pubmed
  13. Forberg T, Sjulstad E, Bakke I, Olsen Y, Hagiwara A, Sakakura Y, et al. Correlation between microbiota and growth in Mangrove Killifish (Kryptolebias marmoratus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Sci Rep. 2016;6:21192 pubmed publisher
  14. Cochran R. Serum androgens during the annual reproductive cycle of the male mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987;65:141-8 pubmed
  15. Cochran R, Zabludoff S, Paynter K, DiMichele L, Palmer R. Serum hormone levels associated with spawning activity in the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988;70:345-54 pubmed
  16. Garcia M, Ferro J, Mattox T, Kopelic S, Marson K, Jones R, et al. Phenotypic differences between the sexes in the sexually plastic mangrove rivulus fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus). J Exp Biol. 2016;219:988-97 pubmed publisher
  17. Mackiewicz M, Tatarenkov A, Taylor D, Turner B, Avise J. Extensive outcrossing and androdioecy in a vertebrate species that otherwise reproduces as a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:9924-8 pubmed
  18. D angelo L, Lossi L, Merighi A, De Girolamo P. Anatomical features for the adequate choice of experimental animal models in biomedicine: I. Fishes. Ann Anat. 2016;205:75-84 pubmed publisher
  19. Furness A, Walsh M, Reznick D. Convergence of life-history phenotypes in a Trinidadian killifish (Rivulus hartii). Evolution. 2012;66:1240-54 pubmed publisher
  20. Hu C, Wang W, Brind Amour J, Singh P, Reeves G, Lorincz M, et al. Vertebrate diapause preserves organisms long term through Polycomb complex members. Science. 2020;367:870-874 pubmed publisher
  21. Wang W, Hu C, Zeng A, Alegre D, Hu D, Gotting K, et al. Changes in regeneration-responsive enhancers shape regenerative capacities in vertebrates. Science. 2020;369: pubmed publisher
  22. Coolen M, Labusch M, Mannioui A, Bally Cuif L. Mosaic Heterochrony in Neural Progenitors Sustains Accelerated Brain Growth and Neurogenesis in the Juvenile Killifish N. furzeri. Curr Biol. 2020;30:736-745.e4 pubmed publisher
  23. Rosemore B, Welsh C. The effects of rearing density, salt concentration, and incubation temperature on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryo development. Zebrafish. 2012;9:185-90 pubmed publisher
  24. Hosmer A, Schneider S, Anderson J, Knopper L, Brain R. Fish short-term reproduction assay with atrazine and the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017;36:2327-2334 pubmed publisher
  25. Oziolor E, Reid N, Yair S, Lee K, Guberman VerPloeg S, Bruns P, et al. Adaptive introgression enables evolutionary rescue from extreme environmental pollution. Science. 2019;364:455-457 pubmed publisher
  26. Pallauf K, Rimbach G, Rupp P, Chin D, Wolf I. Resveratrol and Lifespan in Model Organisms. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23:4639-4680 pubmed
  27. Reid N, Proestou D, Clark B, Warren W, Colbourne J, Shaw J, et al. The genomic landscape of rapid repeated evolutionary adaptation to toxic pollution in wild fish. Science. 2016;354:1305-1308 pubmed
  28. Wagner J, Herrejon Chavez F, Podrabsky J. Mitochondrial DNA Sequence and Lack of Response to Anoxia in the Annual Killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. Front Physiol. 2016;7:379 pubmed publisher
  29. Cohen S, Nicholas B, Jenkins H. Classification of nicotine block at neuromuscular junction. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60:1740-2 pubmed
  30. Blazek R, Polacik M, Reichard M. Rapid growth, early maturation and short generation time in African annual fishes. Evodevo. 2013;4:24 pubmed publisher
  31. Slifko T, Huffman D, Dussert B, Owens J, Jakubowski W, Haas C, et al. Comparison of tissue culture and animal models for assessment of Cryptospridium parvum infection. Exp Parasitol. 2002;101:97-106 pubmed
  32. Rangarajan A, Weinberg R. Opinion: Comparative biology of mouse versus human cells: modelling human cancer in mice. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:952-9 pubmed publisher
  33. McKay A, Costa E, Chen J, Hu C, Chen X, BEDBROOK C, et al. An automated feeding system for the African killifish reveals effects of dietary restriction on lifespan and allows scalable assessment of associative learning. elife. 2022;11: pubmed publisher
  34. McKenzie J, Dhillon R, Schulte P. Steep, coincident, and concordant clines in mitochondrial and nuclear-encoded genes in a hybrid zone between subspecies of Atlantic killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Ecol Evol. 2016;6:5771-87 pubmed publisher
  35. Lloyd N, Janssen S, Reinfelder J, Barkay T. Co-selection of Mercury and Multiple Antibiotic Resistances in Bacteria Exposed to Mercury in the Fundulus heteroclitus Gut Microbiome. Curr Microbiol. 2016;73:834-842 pubmed
  36. Lopez Otin C, Blasco M, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194-217 pubmed publisher
  37. Deguchi T, Itoh M, Urawa H, Matsumoto T, Nakayama S, Kawasaki T, et al. Infrared laser-mediated local gene induction in medaka, zebrafish and Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Growth Differ. 2009;51:769-75 pubmed publisher
  38. Genade T, Benedetti M, Terzibasi E, Roncaglia P, Valenzano D, Cattaneo A, et al. Annual fishes of the genus Nothobranchius as a model system for aging research. Aging Cell. 2005;4:223-33 pubmed
  39. Terzibasi E, Valenzano D, Benedetti M, Roncaglia P, Cattaneo A, Domenici L, et al. Large differences in aging phenotype between strains of the short-lived annual fish Nothobranchius furzeri. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3866 pubmed publisher
  40. Terzibasi E, Valenzano D, Cellerino A. The short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri as a new model system for aging studies. Exp Gerontol. 2007;42:81-9 pubmed
  41. Polacik M, Blazek R, Reichard M. Laboratory breeding of the short-lived annual killifish Nothobranchius furzeri. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1396-413 pubmed publisher
  42. Polacik M, Smith C, Reichard M. Maternal source of variability in the embryo development of an annual killifish. J Evol Biol. 2017;30:738-749 pubmed publisher
  43. Nevid N, Meier A. Nonphotic stimuli alter a day-night rhythm of allograft rejection in gulf killifish. Dev Comp Immunol. 1994;18:495-509 pubmed
  44. Nevid N, Meier A. A day-night rhythm of immune activity during scale allograft rejection in the gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis. Dev Comp Immunol. 1993;17:221-8 pubmed
  45. Orozco A, Jeziorski M, Linser P, Greenberg R, Valverde R C. Cloning of the gene and complete cDNA encoding a type 2 deiodinase from Fundulus heteroclitus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002;128:162-7 pubmed
  46. Terry R, Schnider C, Holden B. Rigid gas permeable lenses and patient management. CLAO J. 1989;15:305-9 pubmed
  47. Abnave P, Conti F, Torre C, Ghigo E. What RNAi screens in model organisms revealed about microbicidal response in mammals?. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:184 pubmed publisher
  48. Wagner J, Podrabsky J. Extreme tolerance and developmental buffering of UV-C induced DNA damage in embryos of the annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2015;323:10-30 pubmed publisher
  49. Roling J, Bain L, Baldwin W. Differential gene expression in mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) following treatment with pyrene: comparison to a creosote contaminated site. Mar Environ Res. 2004;57:377-95 pubmed publisher
  50. Hartmann N, Englert C. A microinjection protocol for the generation of transgenic killifish (Species: Nothobranchius furzeri). Dev Dyn. 2012;241:1133-41 pubmed publisher
  51. Mayrhofer M, Mione M. The Toolbox for Conditional Zebrafish Cancer Models. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;916:21-59 pubmed publisher
  52. Valenzano D, Sharp S, Brunet A. Transposon-Mediated Transgenesis in the Short-Lived African Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri, a Vertebrate Model for Aging. G3 (Bethesda). 2011;1:531-8 pubmed publisher
  53. Cao C, Lemaire L, Yoon P, Choi Y, Parsons L, Matese J, et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptome lineages of a proto-vertebrate. Nature. 2019;571:349-354 pubmed publisher
  54. Valledor M, Hu Q, Schiller P, Myers R. Fluorescent protein engineering by in vivo site-directed mutagenesis. IUBMB Life. 2012;64:684-9 pubmed publisher
  55. Jung D, Cho Y, Meyer J, Di Giulio R. The long amplicon quantitative PCR for DNA damage assay as a sensitive method of assessing DNA damage in the environmental model, Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009;149:182-6 pubmed publisher
  56. Cotter K, Nacci D, Champlin D, Chuprin J, Callard G. Cloning of multiple ERα mRNA variants in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus), and differential expression by tissue type, stage of reproduction, and estrogen exposure in fish from polluted and unpolluted environments. Aquat Toxicol. 2015;159:184-97 pubmed publisher
  57. Hu C, Brunet A. The African turquoise killifish: A research organism to study vertebrate aging and diapause. Aging Cell. 2018;17:e12757 pubmed publisher
  58. Blewett T, Ransberry V, McClelland G, Wood C. Investigating the mechanisms of Ni uptake and sub-lethal toxicity in the Atlantic killifish Fundulus heteroclitus in relation to salinity. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:370-81 pubmed publisher
  59. Wojdylo J, Vogelbein W, Bain L, Rice C. AHR-related activities in a creosote-adapted population of adult atlantic killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, two decades post-EPA superfund status at the Atlantic Wood Site, Portsmouth, VA USA. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;177:74-85 pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139