Detergents: Triton X-100, Tween-20, and More
Mary Johnson (han at labome dot com)
Synatom Research, Princeton, New Jersey, United States
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.3.163
Date
last modified : 2023-05-10; original version : 2013-01-18
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2013;3:163
Abstract

Here we present a comprehensive review of laboratory detergents and their applications in biomedical experiments. This review includes discussions of ionic, non-ionic and zwitterionic detergents, their general properties as well as information about commonly used detergents from each group. Finally, we include a brief discussion of Labome survey results for some common detergents.

Introduction

Detergents used in biomedical laboratories are mild surfactants (surface acting agents), used for cell lysis (i.e., the disruption of cell membranes) and the release of intracellular materials. They are amphiphilic molecules, containing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions. This amphiphilic property allows detergents to break protein-protein, protein-lipid and lipid-lipid associations, denature proteins and other macromolecules, and prevent nonspecific binding in immunochemical assays and protein crystallization.

There are many types of detergents used in laboratory research. New amphiphilic compounds, usually designed for specific applications, continue to be developed (e.g., maltose-neopentyl glycol [1] and glycosyl-substituted dicarboxylates [2] ). This article reviews the characteristics and applications of the most commonly used laboratory detergents.

TypeChemicals
ionicsodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), deoxycholate, cholate, sarkosyl
non-ionicTriton X-100, DDM, digitonin, tween 20, tween 80
zwitterionicCHAPS
chaotropicurea
Table 1. Classification of detergents.

Detergents are amphiphilic organic compounds comprised of a hydrophobic non-polar hydrocarbon moiety (tail) and a hydrophilic polar headgroup (Fig. 1A). This molecular structure is very similar to the amphiphilic phospholipids that make up our cellular membranes, except that the phospholipids possess pair hydrophobic tails attached to the hydrophilic headgroup (Fig 1D). When dissolved in water at appropriate concentrations and temperatures amphiphilic molecules self-assemble into structures that keep their hydrophilic headgroups on the exterior and the hydrophobic tails on the interior away from the water. Due to their molecular differences, detergent molecules form spherical micelles(Fig. 1C) while phospholipids are more likely to develop a bilayer (Fig 1D). The similarity in molecular structures allows the detergent to penetrate phospholipid bilayers and thus disrupt cell membranes.

Furthermore, the hydrophobic core of the micelle can bind to hydrophobic regions of proteins (Fig 1B). The number of detergent molecules in a micelle is called the aggregation number, an important parameter used to assess membrane protein solubility [3]. The length of the hydrophobic region is directly proportional to the degree of hydrophobicity, and it is quite constant among detergents, while the charged headgroup is variable. Both temperature and concentration are important parameters of phase separation and solubility of a detergent. The minimal detergent concentration at which micelles are observed at a given temperature is called the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC). At any concentrations lower than the CMC, only monomers are observed; at concentrations higher than CMC both micelles and monomers co-exist, along with other non-micellar phases that are not dissolved in water. Likewise, the lowest temperature at which micelles are formed is called Critical Micelle Temperature (CMT). CMC is also affected by the degree of lipophilicity of the headgroup. Generally, a low lipophilic or lipophobic character results in high CMC.

Detergents: Triton X-100, Tween-20, and More figure 1
Figure 1. The general structure of detergent monomers (adapted from Anatrace). A: Schematic structure of detergent molecules. B: Hydrophobic proteins (light blue) can be surrounded and solubilized in aqueous solutions using detergents. C: The molecular structure of detergents, with a large hydrophilic headgroup and long hydrophobic tail, makes them curvophilic, inducing them to form spherical micelles in aqueous solutions. D. The paired hydrophobic tails of phospholipids makes them curvophobic, and thus they tend to form sheets called phospholipids bilayers in aqueous solutions.

Common detergents are categorized into three groups based on their characteristics: ionic (anionic or cationic), non-ionic and zwitterionic. Below I discuss common detergents in each of these categories and provide important information about the selection and use of laboratory detergents.

Ionic Detergents

Ionic detergents are comprised of a hydrophobic chain and a charged headgroup which can be either anionic or cationic. They generally have higher CMC values than non-ionic detergents and tend to be fairly harsh. Due to their charged headgroups, ionic detergents cannot be removed by ion exchange chromatography. Furthermore, additional precautions should be taken when using ionic detergents because some of their properties may be altered in buffers with variable ionic strength (e.g., CMC can fall dramatically when the NaCl concentration increases from 0 to 500 mM).

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)

The anionic SDS is a very commonly used and effective surfactant in solubilizing most proteins. It disrupts non-covalent bonds within and between proteins, denaturing them, and resulting in the loss of their native conformation and function. SDS binds to a protein with a ratio of 1.4:1 w/w (corresponding to about one SDS molecule per two amino acids), masking the charge of the protein. Thus SDS adds an overall negative charge to all proteins in the sample regardless of their isoelectric point (pI). Once bound by negatively charged SDS molecules the proteins can be separated based on size. That is a big reason for the wide use of SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for separating and studying proteins. Usually, for complete cell lysis in the presence of SDS, a sample must be sonicated or sheared (e.g., passed through a 19G needle) several times to ensure DNA degradation. SDS cannot be used when active proteins are required or when protein-protein interactions are being studied because both of these are disrupted by the SDS. When working with SDS it is important to know that SDS precipitates at low temperatures, and this effect is enhanced in the presence of potassium salts. This phenomenon can sometimes be exploited to remove SDS from a protein sample [4]. SDS can be used for decellularization [5].

Sodium deoxycholate and sodium cholate

Sodium deoxycholate and sodium cholate are bile salts detergents. They are both anionic detergents. These detergents are often used for membrane disruption and membrane protein extraction, for example, apelin receptor [6]. Deoxycholate does denature proteins while cholate is a non-denaturing detergent. One potential benefit to both of these detergents is that they can be removed from samples via dialysis, which may help with quantification and/or downstream analyses of proteins.

Sarkosyl

Sarkosyl, also known as sarcosyl or sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, is an anionic surfactant. It is amphiphilic due to the hydrophobic 14-carbon chain (lauroyl) and the hydrophilic carboxylate. The carboxylate with a pKa value of 3.6 is negatively charged in any physiological solution. Sarkosyl is prepared from lauroyl chloride and sarcosine in the presence of sodium hydroxide and is purified by recrystallization from alcohol, or by acidification with a mineral acid, separation of the free acid, and neutralization of the free acid. Sarkosyl has also been used to improve wetting and penetration of topical pharmaceutical products. In the food industry, sarkosyl is approved for use in processing, packaging, and transporting food for human consumption, and in adhesives used in food storage or transportation. It is widely used in cosmetic formulations such as shampoos and body washes at concentrations around 3-13% [7]. Sarkosyl is also used in metal finishing end processing for its crystal modifying, anti-rust, and anti-corrosion properties.

Sarkosyl is widely utilized in laboratory experiments, for example for solubilizing tau in Alzheimer disease research [8], due to its good water solubility, high foam stability, and strong sorption capacity to proteins. Sarkosyl serves as a detergent to permeabilize cells and extract proteins in isolation and purification techniques such as western blot and indirect ELISA. It can also inhibit the initiation of DNA transcription.

One major application of sarkosyl is for solubilizing and refolding proteins from inclusion bodies (protein aggregates within cytoplasm or nuclei). Eukaryotic recombinant proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli tend to form such inclusion bodies. Sarkosyl is often used to solubilize an inclusion body pellet to extract the proteins and allow them to refold into their native form. Earlier work involved solubilizing inclusion bodies with denaturants, such as urea or guanidinium hydrochloride, and refolding by slow dilution — however, most of the solubilized proteins aggregate and precipitate upon removal of the strong detergents. Sarkosyl is an effective solubilizing agent that minimizes aggregation and allows refolding at higher protein concentrations (as much as 10-fold higher when compared to using guanidinium hydrochloride [9] ). One study found the over 95% of inclusion body fusion proteins were solubilized with 10% sarkosyl, and that the proteins could then be recovered with a mix of other detergents (i.e., Triton X-100 and CHAPS) [10]. Proteins in the soluble extract with sarkosyl can also be stored at 4°C for a week before affinity purification. It should be noted, however, that sarkosyl interferes with the subsequent chromatographic process and must be removed from the solution by dilution or dialysis.

Non-ionic Detergent

Non-ionic detergents have uncharged hydrophilic headgroups. They are considered mild surfactants as they break protein-lipid and lipid-lipid associations, but typically not protein-protein interactions, and generally, do not denature proteins. Therefore, many membrane proteins may be solubilized in their native and active form, retaining their protein interactors. However, because not all proteins behave the same with different non-ionic detergents, trial and error may be necessary to find the best detergent for your protein(s) of interest. Additionally, it should be noted that most non-ionic detergents interfere with ultra-violet (UV) spectrophotometry. Therefore, protein determination at 280 nm in the presence of non-ionic detergents is typically imprecise.

Detergents: Triton X-100, Tween-20, and More figure 2
Figure 2. Structure and formulas of some common detergents (adapted from G-Biosciences).
The Triton family

All members of the Triton family: Triton X-100, Triton X-114, Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), Igepal® CA-630, are quite similar, differing slightly in their average number (n) of monomers per micelle (9.6, 8.0, 9.0, and 9.5, respectively) and the size distribution of their polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based headgroup. The CMC values of these detergents are low, and therefore they can not be easily removed by dialysis. Triton X-100, a typical non-ionic detergent, derives from polyoxyethylene and contains an alkylphenyl hydrophobic group. Triton X-100 is commonly used for isolating membrane protein complexes, and the surfactant of choice for most such as for co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Other members of the Triton family are used for membrane protein isolation by phase-separation due to low cloud points (the temperature at which the micelles aggregate and form a distinct phase). While the cloud point of Triton X-100 is 64°C, the cloud point of Triton X-114 is 23°C. This allows for membrane protein extraction and solubilization in Triton X-114 without bringing the samples up to warmer temperatures which may denature many proteins.

Brij™ 35 is another nonionic polyoxyethylene surfactant, commonly used as a component of cell lysis buffers or assay buffers or a surfactant in HPLC applications.

Detergents: Triton X-100, Tween-20, and More figure 3
Figure 3. Structure and formulas of Tween 20 and Tween 80.
n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside and other maltosides

The n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) is a glycosidic surfactant, increasingly used with hydrophobic and membrane protein isolation when the protein activity needs to be preserved. It is more efficient at protein solubilization for 2-D electrophoresis than several other detergents, including CHAPS and NP-40 [11]. The glycochain in its lipophilic site, its high CMC of 0.17 mM and the interface of the micelles create an aqueous-like microenvironment ideal for solubilizing and retaining the stability of membrane and hydrophobic proteins [12]. For example, Winkler MBL et al purified NCR1 protein with the addition of n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside [13] ; so did Li Y et al for LptB2FG and LptB2FGC proteins [14]. Steichen JM et al mixed protein complexes in a solution of DDM from Anatrace before Cryo-EM [15]. DDM is also used as an excipient in nasal sprays Valtoco and Tosymra.

Other maltosides, such as beta-decyl-maltoside, have different lengths of the hydrophobic alkyl chains. Glucoside (octyl-glucoside) are a potential alternative to maltoside detergents for protein research [16].

Digitonin

Digitonin, a steroidal glycoside derived from the purple foxglove plant (Digitalis purpurea), is used for the solubilization of cellular membranes. As with other non-ionic detergents discussed here, digitonin is frequently used to solubilized membrane proteins without denaturing them. For example, B de Laval et al lysed cells with 1% of digitonin for Tn5 transposase reaction during the ATAC-seq protocol [17]. Zhao Y et al released synaptic and extrasynaptic AMPA receptors from postsynaptic density with digitonin [18]. Additionally, digitonin is used to extract cellular organelles. Digitonin interacts with cholesterol in membranes and thus can be used to permeabilize the cholesterol-rich plasma membrane while leaving the cholesterol-poor organelle membranes intact.

The Tween family

Tween-20 and Tween-80 are polysorbate surfactants with a fatty acid ester moiety and a long polyoxyethylene chain. They have very low CMC, are generally gentle surfactants, do not affect protein activity and are effective in solubilization. Tweens are not common ingredients of cell lysis buffers; however, they are routinely used as washing agents in immunoblotting and ELISA to minimize nonspecific binding of antibodies and to remove unbound moieties, and used to permeabilize cell membranes. For example, Yang J et al immunostained intracellular FLAG tag after treating HEK293 cells with 0.2% Tween 20 [19]. The solubilization of lipid membranes by Tween-20 is studied in detail recently [20].

One common question regarding the Tween family detergents is the difference between Tween 20 and Tween 80, the two most commonly used members. Tween 20 has lauric acid, while Tween 80 has oleic acid (Figure 3). Table 2 summarizes various aspects between them. These detergents can often be used interchangeably; however, the difference between them is sometimes important, such as in in vivo studies that may be influenced by the different levels of hemolytic effect of Tween 20 and Tween 80 [21]. Greenwood DJ et al, for example, grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a medium supplemented with 0.05% Tween 80 [22]. Ouadah Y et al injected a dibenzazepine solution with 0.1% v/v Tween 80 into mice to inhibit Notch signalling [23].

Synonyms Chemical Formula Molecular Weight Density (g/mL) Appearance Applications
Tween 20polysorbate 20, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, PEG (20) sorbitan monolaurateC58H114O2612281.1Clear, yellow to yellow-green viscous liquida broad range of applications: as a blocking agent in PBS or TBS wash buffers for ELISA, Western blotting and other immunoassay methods; for lysing mammalian cells; and as a solubilizing agent for membrane proteins.
Tween 80polysorbate 80, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, PEG (80) sorbitan monooleateC64H124O2613101.06-1.09amber colored viscous liquidas a stabilizing agent for proteins; used in tests for the identification of phenotype of some mycobacteria; used in vaccine preparations [24]
Table 2. Characteristics of Tween 20 and Tween 80
Other Non-ionic Amphiphiles

Though non-ionic detergents are generally relatively mild, many proteins do denature or aggregate in the presence of these detergents. To ameliorate this issue new non-ionic glyco-lithocholate amphiphiles (GLC-1, GLC-2, and GLC-3) and glyco-diosgenin amphiphile (GDN) have been developed [25]. GDN was used to extract yeast mitochondrial dimeric ATP synthase to understand better how the protein functions [26]. Pluronic F-68 is commonly used in suspension cell culture at 0.1% to reduce the water shear force [27].

Zwitterionic Detergents

The headgroups of zwitterionic detergents are hydrophilic and contain both positive and negative charges in equal numbers, resulting in zero net charge. They are more harsh surfactants than the non-ionic detergents. A typical zwitterionic detergent is 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate, better known as CHAPS. CHAPS high CMC (6 mM at room temperature) allows efficient removal by dialysis. It is very common in sample preparation at concentrations of 2-4% for isoelectric focusing and 2D electrophoresis. CHAPSO differs with CHAPS in that it contains a more polar headgroup, which makes it more capable of solubilizing hydrophobic molecules. Thus, CHAPSO is mainly used for solubilization of integral membrane proteins.

Chaotropes

Chaotropic agents are similar substances to surfactants in that they break non-covalent interactions (hydrogen bonds, dipole-dipole interactions, hydrophobic interactions) facilitating protein denaturation, which in this case is usually reversible. Urea is a common chaotropic agent used alone, or in combination with thiourea or other detergents, in applications like 2D-gel electrophoresis and in-solution enzymatic digestion of proteins for preparation during proteomic workflows. When using Urea, extra care must be taken not to heat the sample above 37°C as this will lead to carbamylation of proteins [28].

Detergents for the Isolation of Membrane Proteins

For membrane protein solubility, a detergent with high CMC should generally be chosen, and the volume and concentration of the buffer are also crucial as enough detergent should be present to solubilize all membrane proteins in the sample. In most cases, the detergent concentration should be well about the CMC level (at least 2X the CMC) to ensure sufficient micelle concentration to solubilize the membrane proteins. According to Linke [3], at least one micelle is needed per membrane protein molecule to sufficiently mimic the lipid environment of a membrane (Fig. 1B, D).

Phase separation can be used to purify the proteins further. This requires adjusting the temperature and the concentrations of salts and detergent in the buffer to cause the detergent micelles to aggregate and separate from the aqueous layer. In this case, the membrane proteins, surrounded by the micelles, aggregate with the detergent. The temperature at which the detergent solution separates into two phases, the cloud point, is affected by glycerol or salts in the buffer (e.g., Triton X-114 has a cloud point of 23°C, but in the presence of 20% glycerol, the cloud point declines to 4°C). This is very important since the stability of a protein is affected by high temperatures.

Choice of Detergents

A good detergent should be able to lyse cells, solubilize proteins and be suitable for your downstream application(s). Also, the solubilized protein in native or denatured form should be considered. There is no ideal detergent for all applications, and even in the same application, the result varies (Table 3). Therefore, after options are considered, trial and error are often necessary to find the best detergent, and a mixture of detergents may be optimal. Also, the fresh preparation of detergent working solution is usually the best practice to avoid hydrolysis and oxidation.

DetergentMW (Da) monomerMW (Da) micelleCMC (mM) 25oCAggregation No.Cloud Point (oC)Avg. Micellar WeightStrengthDialyzableApplications
SDS28918,0007-1062>10018,000HarshYesCell lysis, Electrophoresis, WB, hybridization
Triton X-10062590,0000.2-0.9100-1556580,000MildNoEnzyme immunoassays, IP, Membrane solubilization
CHAPS6156,150610>1006,150MildYesIEF, IP
NP-4068090,0000.05945-50MildNoIEF
n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside5110.159850,000Protein Crystallization
Tween-2012280.0676MildNoWB, ELISA, Enzyme immunoassays
Digitonin122970,000<0.56070,000MildNoMembrane solubilization
Table 3. Properties and main applications of common detergents. Information from the University of Florida, BCH6206. WB, western blotting; IP, immunoprecipitation; IEF, isoelectric focusing;
Removal of Detergents

The downstream applications often require that detergent concentrations be lowered or completely removed. For such purposes, size exclusion chromatography or dialysis can be used if the micelle size is substantially different than the protein of interest or micelles are small enough (i.e., high CMC) to pass through the dialysis tubing [3]. Other methods employ the use of detergent binding non-polar beads or resins, cyclodextrin inclusion compounds [29], ion-exchange chromatography or protein precipitation. However, the buffer used after detergent removal must be selected carefully to avoid protein precipitation or aggregation.

Detergents in Labome Survey

Labome surveys the literature for the application of detergents. The following table lists the main suppliers, and the number of articles, indicating most of the detergents are supplied by MilliporeSigma.

detergent suppliers
Triton X-100MilliporeSigma [30], Thermo Fisher [31, 32], Electron Microscopy Sciences [33]
Tween-20Bio-Rad [34], MilliporeSigma [32], Thermo Fisher
SDSAmresco, Bio-Rad, Q.BIOgene, MilliporeSigma
NP-40Roche, MilliporeSigma [35]
CHAPSMilliporeSigma, JT Baker
digitoninMilliporeSigma, Wako
DDMGeneron [36], Anatrace [16]
Table 4. Detergents in the Labome literature survey.
Triton X-100

Thermo Fisher Pierce Triton X-100, for exampl, BP151 [32] or 85111 [31], was used to lyse cell and tissue samples for immunohistochesmitry [32] and immunocytochemistry [31]. MilliporeSigma Triton X-100 was used to lyze cells [37], or permeabilize cells in immunocytochemistry [38], and in blocking buffer for immunohistochemistry [39, 40] and proteinase K protection assay [41].

Tween-20 and Tween-80

Tween-20 is commonly used in washing buffers, such as TBS-Tween (TBS-T) or PBS-Tween (PBT-T), in various immunoassays. MilliporeSigma Tween-20, for example, P1379 [32], was used in washing blots [32], in IHC experiments (P1379) [42], in immunoprecipitation [43],and in microfluidic array multiplex PCR [44] and others [45]. MilliporeSigma Tween-80, was used to dissolve erlotinib (a chemotherapy drug) [46] and as a supplement to grow M. tuberculosis strains [47].

SDS

Lonza SDS (catalog number 51213) was used in chromatin preparations [42]. Amresco SDS was used in SDS-PAGE [48]. Bio-Rad sodium dodecyl sulfate was used to prepare a radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [49]. MilliporeSigma-Aldrich SDS was used to prepare buffers for, among others, in vitro octanoylation assays, Laemmli sample buffer, 2D-DIGE experiments [50].

NP-40

Roche NP-40 was used in cell lysis [51, 52]. MilliporeSigma NP-40 was used to prepare radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [49], cell lysis/homogenization buffers buffer [53, 54] and immunoprecipitation assay RIPA buffer [55].

CHAPS

MilliporeSigma CHAPS was used in buffers for protein crystallization [56]. JT Baker CHAPS was used to lyse cells to study viral interaction with human ASF1 protein [57].

Digitonin

MilliporeSigma was used in an immunocytochemistry experiment to study PI4P [58] and used to perform proteinase K protection assays [41], and to extract RNA [59]. Wako digitonin was used to lyse cells [60] and perform immunoprecipitation experiments [61].

Maltosides and glucosides

Y Lee et al solubilized a GPCR protein with dodecylmaltoside / DDM from Generon [36]. Anatrace n-decyl-beta-D-maltopyranoside was used for protein purification [62, 63] ; so were its n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside [64] and n-undecyl-beta-D-maltoside [65, 66]. Glycon beta-dodecyl-maltoside and beta-decyl-maltoside were also used in protein purification [67]. Anatrace n-octyl-beta-glucoside was used in solubilizing AQP4 proteins [16].

Others

Silva MC et al used Brij-35 as the detergent for bio-layer interferometry biosensor assay [68]. For protein purifications, Affymetrix octyl glucose neopentyl glycol (OGNPG) at 1% [69], and MilliporeSigma cholesteryl hemisuccinate at 0.1% or 0.05% (w/v) [12, 70] were used. For chromatin-related assays, MilliporeSigma-Aldrich sodium deoxycholate (catalog number D6750) and Igepal (catalog number I8896), and TEKnova N-lauroylsarcosine (catalog number S3379) were used [42].

References
  1. Chae P, Rasmussen S, Rana R, Gotfryd K, Chandra R, Goren M, et al. Maltose-neopentyl glycol (MNG) amphiphiles for solubilization, stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Nat Methods. 2010;7:1003-8 pubmed publisher
  2. Nguyen K, Peuchmaur M, Magnard S, Haudecoeur R, Boyère C, Mounien S, et al. Glycosyl-Substituted Dicarboxylates as Detergents for the Extraction, Overstabilization, and Crystallization of Membrane Proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57:2948-2952 pubmed publisher
  3. Linke D. Detergents: an overview. Methods Enzymol. 2009;463:603-17 pubmed publisher
  4. Suzuki H, Terada T. Removal of dodecyl sulfate from protein solution. Anal Biochem. 1988;172:259-63 pubmed
  5. Han E, Qian H, Jiang B, Figetakis M, Kosyakova N, Tellides G, et al. A therapeutic vascular conduit to support in vivo cell-secreted therapy. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:40 pubmed publisher
  6. Ma Y, Ding Y, Song X, Ma X, Li X, Zhang N, et al. Structure-guided discovery of a single-domain antibody agonist against human apelin receptor. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaax7379 pubmed publisher
  7. Lanigan R. Final report on the safety assessment of Cocoyl Sarcosine, Lauroyl Sarcosine, Myristoyl Sarcosine, Oleoyl Sarcosine, Stearoyl Sarcosine, Sodium Cocoyl Sarcosinate, Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate, Sodium Myristoyl Sarcosinate, Ammonium Cocoyl Sarcosinate,. Int J Toxicol. 2001;20 Suppl 1:1-14 pubmed
  8. Ising C, Venegas C, Zhang S, Scheiblich H, Schmidt S, Vieira Saecker A, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation drives tau pathology. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  9. Burgess R. Purification of overproduced Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma factors by solubilizing inclusion bodies and refolding from Sarkosyl. Methods Enzymol. 1996;273:145-9 pubmed
  10. Tao H, Liu W, Simmons B, Harris H, Cox T, Massiah M. Purifying natively folded proteins from inclusion bodies using sarkosyl, Triton X-100, and CHAPS. Biotechniques. 2010;48:61-4 pubmed publisher
  11. Luche S, Santoni V, Rabilloud T. Evaluation of nonionic and zwitterionic detergents as membrane protein solubilizers in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics. 2003;3:249-53 pubmed
  12. Staus D, Hu H, Robertson M, Kleinhenz A, Wingler L, Capel W, et al. Structure of the M2 muscarinic receptor-β-arrestin complex in a lipid nanodisc. Nature. 2020;579:297-302 pubmed publisher
  13. Winkler M, Kidmose R, Szomek M, Thaysen K, Rawson S, Muench S, et al. Structural Insight into Eukaryotic Sterol Transport through Niemann-Pick Type C Proteins. Cell. 2019;179:485-497.e18 pubmed publisher
  14. Li Y, Orlando B, Liao M. Structural basis of lipopolysaccharide extraction by the LptB2FGC complex. Nature. 2019;567:486-490 pubmed publisher
  15. Steichen J, Lin Y, Havenar Daughton C, Pecetta S, Ozorowski G, Willis J, et al. A generalized HIV vaccine design strategy for priming of broadly neutralizing antibody responses. Science. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  16. Kitchen P, Salman M, Halsey A, Clarke Bland C, MacDonald J, Ishida H, et al. Targeting Aquaporin-4 Subcellular Localization to Treat Central Nervous System Edema. Cell. 2020;181:784-799.e19 pubmed publisher
  17. de Laval B, Maurizio J, Kandalla P, Brisou G, Simonnet L, Huber C, et al. C/EBPβ-Dependent Epigenetic Memory Induces Trained Immunity in Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:657-674.e8 pubmed publisher
  18. Zhao Y, Chen S, Swensen A, Qian W, Gouaux E. Architecture and subunit arrangement of native AMPA receptors elucidated by cryo-EM. Science. 2019;364:355-362 pubmed publisher
  19. Yang J, Chen J, Del Carmen Vitery M, Osei Owusu J, Chu J, Yu H, et al. PAC, an evolutionarily conserved membrane protein, is a proton-activated chloride channel. Science. 2019;364:395-399 pubmed publisher
  20. Dresser L, Graham S, Miller L, Schaefer C, Conteduca D, Johnson S, et al. Tween-20 Induces the Structural Remodeling of Single Lipid Vesicles. J Phys Chem Lett. 2022;13:5341-5350 pubmed publisher
  21. Vinardell M, Infante M. The relationship between the chain length of non-ionic surfactants and their hemolytic action on human erythrocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1999;124:117-20 pubmed
  22. Greenwood D, Dos Santos M, Huang S, Russell M, Collinson L, Macrae J, et al. Subcellular antibiotic visualization reveals a dynamic drug reservoir in infected macrophages. Science. 2019;364:1279-1282 pubmed publisher
  23. Ouadah Y, Rojas E, Riordan D, Capostagno S, Kuo C, Krasnow M. Rare Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cells Are Stem Cells Regulated by Rb, p53, and Notch. Cell. 2019;179:403-416.e23 pubmed publisher
  24. Bangaru S, Ozorowski G, Turner H, Antanasijevic A, Huang D, Wang X, et al. Structural analysis of full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from an advanced vaccine candidate. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  25. Chae P, Rasmussen S, Rana R, Gotfryd K, Kruse A, Manglik A, et al. A new class of amphiphiles bearing rigid hydrophobic groups for solubilization and stabilization of membrane proteins. Chemistry. 2012;18:9485-90 pubmed publisher
  26. Guo H, Bueler S, Rubinstein J. Atomic model for the dimeric FO region of mitochondrial ATP synthase. Science. 2017;358:936-940 pubmed publisher
  27. Delaneau O, Zazhytska M, Borel C, Giannuzzi G, Rey G, Howald C, et al. Chromatin three-dimensional interactions mediate genetic effects on gene expression. Science. 2019;364: pubmed publisher
  28. Rabilloud T. Detergents and chaotropes for protein solubilization before two-dimensional electrophoresis. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;528:259-67 pubmed publisher
  29. Degrip W, VanOostrum J, Bovee Geurts P. Selective detergent-extraction from mixed detergent/lipid/protein micelles, using cyclodextrin inclusion compounds: a novel generic approach for the preparation of proteoliposomes. Biochem J. 1998;330 ( Pt 2):667-74 pubmed
  30. Meharena H, Marco A, Dileep V, Lockshin E, Akatsu G, Mullahoo J, et al. Down-syndrome-induced senescence disrupts the nuclear architecture of neural progenitors. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29:116-130.e7 pubmed publisher
  31. Gaglia G, Rashid R, Yapp C, Joshi G, Li C, Lindquist S, et al. HSF1 phase transition mediates stress adaptation and cell fate decisions. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:151-158 pubmed publisher
  32. Strickley J, Messerschmidt J, Awad M, Li T, Hasegawa T, Ha D, et al. Immunity to commensal papillomaviruses protects against skin cancer. Nature. 2019;: pubmed publisher
  33. Shwartz Y, Gonzalez Celeiro M, Chen C, Pasolli H, Sheu S, Fan S, et al. Cell Types Promoting Goosebumps Form a Niche to Regulate Hair Follicle Stem Cells. Cell. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  34. Schulte Schrepping J, Reusch N, Paclik D, Baßler K, Schlickeiser S, Zhang B, et al. Severe COVID-19 Is Marked by a Dysregulated Myeloid Cell Compartment. Cell. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  35. Badimon A, Strasburger H, Ayata P, Chen X, Nair A, Ikegami A, et al. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  36. Lee Y, Warne T, Nehmé R, Pandey S, Dwivedi Agnihotri H, Chaturvedi M, et al. Molecular basis of β-arrestin coupling to formoterol-bound β1-adrenoceptor. Nature. 2020;583:862-866 pubmed publisher
  37. Divine R, Dang H, Ueda G, Fallas J, Vulovic I, Sheffler W, et al. Designed proteins assemble antibodies into modular nanocages. Science. 2021;372: pubmed publisher
  38. Yu H, Lu S, Gasior K, Singh D, Vazquez Sanchez S, Tapia O, et al. HSP70 chaperones RNA-free TDP-43 into anisotropic intranuclear liquid spherical shells. Science. 2021;371: pubmed publisher
  39. Fang S, Wei J, Pentinmikko N, Leinonen H, Salven P. Generation of functional blood vessels from a single c-kit+ adult vascular endothelial stem cell. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001407 pubmed publisher
  40. Kamada N, Kim Y, Sham H, Vallance B, Puente J, Martens E, et al. Regulated virulence controls the ability of a pathogen to compete with the gut microbiota. Science. 2012;336:1325-9 pubmed publisher
  41. Chaudhuri D, Sancak Y, Mootha V, Clapham D. MCU encodes the pore conducting mitochondrial calcium currents. elife. 2013;2:e00704 pubmed publisher
  42. Nicetto D, Donahue G, Jain T, Peng T, Sidoli S, Sheng L, et al. H3K9me3-heterochromatin loss at protein-coding genes enables developmental lineage specification. Science. 2019;363:294-297 pubmed publisher
  43. Duong H, Robles M, Knutti D, Weitz C. A molecular mechanism for circadian clock negative feedback. Science. 2011;332:1436-9 pubmed publisher
  44. Tadmor A, Ottesen E, Leadbetter J, Phillips R. Probing individual environmental bacteria for viruses by using microfluidic digital PCR. Science. 2011;333:58-62 pubmed publisher
  45. Osterloh J, Yang J, Rooney T, Fox A, Adalbert R, Powell E, et al. dSarm/Sarm1 is required for activation of an injury-induced axon death pathway. Science. 2012;337:481-4 pubmed publisher
  46. Zhang X, Zhang H, Tighiouart M, Lee J, Shin H, Khuri F, et al. Synergistic inhibition of head and neck tumor growth by green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:1005-14 pubmed publisher
  47. Domenech P, Kobayashi H, LeVier K, Walker G, Barry C. BacA, an ABC transporter involved in maintenance of chronic murine infections with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:477-85 pubmed publisher
  48. Wang F, Wang X, Yuan C, Ma J. Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science. 2010;327:1132-5 pubmed publisher
  49. Che X, Reichelt M, Sommer M, Rajamani J, Zerboni L, Arvin A. Functions of the ORF9-to-ORF12 gene cluster in varicella-zoster virus replication and in the pathogenesis of skin infection. J Virol. 2008;82:5825-34 pubmed publisher
  50. Lin I, Miller D, Bertics P, Murphy C, de Pablo J, Abbott N. Endotoxin-induced structural transformations in liquid crystalline droplets. Science. 2011;332:1297-300 pubmed publisher
  51. Mayer A, Heidemann M, Lidschreiber M, Schreieck A, Sun M, Hintermair C, et al. CTD tyrosine phosphorylation impairs termination factor recruitment to RNA polymerase II. Science. 2012;336:1723-5 pubmed publisher
  52. Lu B, PereiraPerrin M. A novel immunoprecipitation strategy identifies a unique functional mimic of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands in the pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3530-8 pubmed publisher
  53. Slipicevic A, Jørgensen K, Skrede M, Rosnes A, Trøen G, Davidson B, et al. The fatty acid binding protein 7 (FABP7) is involved in proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:276 pubmed publisher
  54. Griesbach G, Hovda D, Gomez Pinilla F, Sutton R. Voluntary exercise or amphetamine treatment, but not the combination, increases hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and synapsin I following cortical contusion injury in rats. Neuroscience. 2008;154:530-40 pubmed publisher
  55. Peralta Ramirez J, Hernandez J, Manning Cela R, Luna Munoz J, Garcia Tovar C, Nougayrede J, et al. EspF Interacts with nucleation-promoting factors to recruit junctional proteins into pedestals for pedestal maturation and disruption of paracellular permeability. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3854-68 pubmed publisher
  56. Banerjee A, Lee A, CAMPBELL E, MacKinnon R. Structure of a pore-blocking toxin in complex with a eukaryotic voltage-dependent K(+) channel. elife. 2013;2:e00594 pubmed publisher
  57. Ambagala A, Bosma T, Ali M, Poustovoitov M, Chen J, Gershon M, et al. Varicella-zoster virus immediate-early 63 protein interacts with human antisilencing function 1 protein and alters its ability to bind histones h3.1 and h3.3. J Virol. 2009;83:200-9 pubmed publisher
  58. Hammond G, Fischer M, Anderson K, Holdich J, Koteci A, Balla T, et al. PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are essential but independent lipid determinants of membrane identity. Science. 2012;337:727-30 pubmed publisher
  59. Mahadevan K, Zhang H, Akef A, Cui X, Gueroussov S, Cenik C, et al. RanBP2/Nup358 potentiates the translation of a subset of mRNAs encoding secretory proteins. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001545 pubmed publisher
  60. McCoy W, Wang X, Yokoyama W, Hansen T, Fremont D. Structural mechanism of ER retrieval of MHC class I by cowpox. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001432 pubmed publisher
  61. Lee B, Moon J, Shu J, Yuan L, Newman Z, Schekman R, et al. UNC93B1 mediates differential trafficking of endosomal TLRs. elife. 2013;2:e00291 pubmed publisher
  62. Kudryashev M, Stenta M, Schmelz S, Amstutz M, Wiesand U, Castaño Diez D, et al. In situ structural analysis of the Yersinia enterocolitica injectisome. elife. 2013;2:e00792 pubmed publisher
  63. Miller A, Long S. Crystal structure of the human two-pore domain potassium channel K2P1. Science. 2012;335:432-6 pubmed publisher
  64. Zhou L, Sazanov L. Structure and conformational plasticity of the intact Thermus thermophilus V/A-type ATPase. Science. 2019;365: pubmed publisher
  65. Zimmermann I, Marabelli A, Bertozzi C, Sivilotti L, Dutzler R. Inhibition of the prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC by divalent cations. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001429 pubmed publisher
  66. Oldham M, Chen J. Crystal structure of the maltose transporter in a pretranslocation intermediate state. Science. 2011;332:1202-5 pubmed publisher
  67. Schulz S, Iglesias Cans M, Krah A, Yildiz O, Leone V, Matthies D, et al. A new type of Na(+)-driven ATP synthase membrane rotor with a two-carboxylate ion-coupling motif. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001596 pubmed publisher
  68. Silva M, Ferguson F, Cai Q, Donovan K, Nandi G, Patnaik D, et al. Targeted degradation of aberrant tau in frontotemporal dementia patient-derived neuronal cell models. elife. 2019;8: pubmed publisher
  69. Kellosalo J, Kajander T, Kogan K, Pokharel K, Goldman A. The structure and catalytic cycle of a sodium-pumping pyrophosphatase. Science. 2012;337:473-6 pubmed publisher
  70. Xu F, Wu H, KATRITCH V, Han G, Jacobson K, Gao Z, et al. Structure of an agonist-bound human A2A adenosine receptor. Science. 2011;332:322-7 pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139