Antibody Conjugation
Vinita Balasubramanya
Bangalore, India
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.8.2670
Date
last modified : 2022-10-19; original version : 2018-11-23
Cite as
MATER METHODS 2018;8:2670
Abstract

A comprehensive review of methods for antibody conjugation.

Conjugation Chemistry

Antibody conjugation is usually achieved through chemical reaction, although specific enzymatic conjugation, such as sortase-based protein terminal conjugation [1, 2], or even through protein engineering [3], is gaining popularity. The preferred site for chemical conjugation on the antibody is the –NH2 (amine) group of a lysine or the free –SH (sulfhydryl) group of cysteine [4]. While the conjugation chemistry treats all accessible residues equally, the number of molecules that can be conjugated is limited by the following:

  • pH dependence of the reaction: Reaction conditions that allow only specific groups to react can be standardized to obtain an optimum Ab: reporter molecule ratio. E.g., at an alkaline pH, the reactivity of certain aliphatic amine groups is much higher than other groups. There is also a problem of overall antibody stability at alkaline pH. It is crucial to limit the reaction time under these conditions to avoid deterioration of the antibody. Conjugated cysteine residues are prone to fragmentation at alkaline pH [5]. This is why most commercial conjugation kits are designed to complete the conjugation reaction within 15- 30 minutes and usually target the primary amine group of lysine (see Table 5).

    Another option is to engineer antibodies to alter the pI from 8-9 to 5-6 [6]. This ensures that the antibody does not precipitate during the conjugation reaction.

  • Size of the conjugate: Small molecules like haptens or drugs can be conjugated in a minimum ratio of antibody: conjugate::1:4 or even 1:10. Larger molecules like enzymes may be restricted to just two molecules per antibody. For oligonucleotides, the ratio is 1:1.
  • Presence of the lysine and cysteine residues in the Fab which determine Ag binding and therefore should not be conjugated. On an average, IgG molecules have about 80 lysine residues of which 20 are present in solvent accessible sites. Cysteine residues are more uniformly distributed and are fewer in number. About 16 pairs of cysteine residues exist as 12 intra-chain and four inter-chain disulfide bonds. Inter-chain cysteine is usually targeted for conjugation due to its solvent accessibility [7].

To enhance the efficacy of conjugation the antibody may be altered by the introduction of unusual amino acids or chemical modification.

Amino acid replacement

One method to reduce the number of undesirable conjugations is the replacement of cysteine with selenocysteine. This reduces the probability of conjugation occurring at inappropriate sites of the polypeptide chain(s) that disrupt the structure of the antibody (and therefore its affinity and/or specificity) [8].

In the case of antibody-drug conjugates, modification of glutamine residues using the enzyme transglutaminase, modification of aldehyde-tagged proteins at their C-terminal and introduction of unnatural amino acids such as p-acetylphenylalanine using cell-free systems have been employed to generate specific, stable and productive conjugates [9]. TH Pillow et al introduced LC-K149C, HC-L174C, and HC-Y373C cysteine residues into anti-HER2 7C2 and anti-CLL-1 antibodies to enable their conjugation with chimeric degraders [10].

Reagent Properties Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Traut’s reagent (2-iminothiolane)Converts primary amines to sulfhydryls at pH 7.0Maintains positive charge Retains protein solubility Sufficient length of spacer arm reduces steric hindranceNot very versatile [11]
MBS (3-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester)Modifies amines to sulfhydryls to form a thioether linkage with other moleculesHighly stable linkageUse limited to research and diagnostic purposes [12]
SPDP (N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate)Modifies free amine groups through a short-chain crosslinker. The sulfhydryl moiety introduced can be linked to a cysteine through a disulphide bond.The conjugation reaction can be assessed by following the release of pyridine-2-thione at 343 nm. The resultant disulfide bonds with cysteine sulfhydryls can be cleaved easily by 10-50 mM DTT or even SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer at pH 8.5. SPDP comes in a variety of PEGylated forms, allowing for a longer spacer arm length.Being water-insoluble, a high concentration of the reagent in dimethylformamide (DMF) or dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) should be used to keep the organic solvent in the reaction mix to a minimum. [13]
SATA (N-succinimidyl S-acetylthioacetate)Covalently modifies primary amines to generate a protected sulfhydryl group.Adds a short-chain (2.8-angstrom spacer arm) reagent Deacylation is done with the addition of a mild reagent such as hydroxylamine- HCl to generate a free sulfhydryl. Hence protein structure/function is not affected. Allows the long-term storage of the sulfhydryl-modified antibody. Forms cleavable disulfide bonds with other sulfhydryl-containing molecules Forms highly stable amide bonds with primary amines of lysine residues
SMCC (succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate)Contains both N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester and maleimide groups. NHS moiety with primary amines takes place at pH 7–9 to form amide bonds. The maleimide part of the reagent reacts with sulfhydryl groups from another molecule at pH 6.5–7.5 to form stable thioether bondsThe stability of the maleimide-derived thioether is enhanced by the cyclohexane group. These derivatives can be stored for up to 64 hours in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7 at 4°C. Modified proteins can also be lyophilized and stored for later conjugation to a sulfhydryl-containing molecule.The bonds formed are non-cleavable SMCC is water-insoluble. Hence a highly concentrated solution of the reagent in DMF or DMSO should be used. [14]
Sulfo-SMCCAlso contains both N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester and maleimide groups. NHS moiety with primary amines takes place at pH 7–9 to form amide bonds. The maleimide part of the reagent reacts with sulfhydryl groups from another molecule at pH 6.5–7.5 to form stable thioether bondsCrosslinking reactions can be carried out in physiological solutions since the reagent is water-soluble The absence of an organic solvent also ensures that the protein structure is not perturbed Like SMCC, the cyclohexane bridge confers stability to the maleimide derivative which can be stored for up to 64 hours in 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7 at 4CThe conjugate is bound by a non-cleavable linkage. Being membrane-impermeable, it cannot be used for in situ crosslinking of cells and tissues [15]
Table 1. Conversion of primary amines to sulfhydryl groups by different reagents.
Chemical modification of antibodies: an introduction of free sulfhydryl groups in proteins

One advantage of sulfhydryl groups is that they can be used to form a stable, cleavable disulfide (-S-S-) linkage. Most of the cysteines in antibodies are already present in the form of disulfides, and the available ones may not be at convenient positions. Hence sulfhydryl groups can be introduced at the site of primary amines – especially those of lysine residues- by modification with reagents such as Traut's reagent (2-iminothiolane), MBS, SPDP, SATA, and their derivatives. Some of the features of these reagents are given in Table 1.

Antibody Conjugation figure 1
Figure 1. Modification of amines to sulfhydryls. A) Reaction with Traut’s reagent to generate a free sulfhydryl. B) Generation of a non-cleavable sulfhydryl using SMCC. C) Generation of a protected sulfhydryl using maleimide crosslinking.
Reporter Systems Conjugated to Antibodies
Enzyme-conjugated antibodies

Enzymes linked to antibodies form the basis of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (see Table 2). These are among the most extensively used types of IA and are safer and easier than the RIA. They combine the specificity of antibody-antigen interaction with the sensitivity of enzyme assays. Moreover, since it can be performed in multiple well plates, several samples can be assayed simultaneously. Three main types of ELISAs have been developed to date, based on the substrate used. The earliest was the immunoassay using a colorimetric method for detection. However, this method typically detects 0.01 ng to 0.1 ng of antigen which is relatively low. The sensitivity of ELISAs can be improved using fluorogenic and chemiluminescent substrates.

Enzyme Reactive moiety Conjugation method Advantages Disadvantages
Horseradish peroxidaseSugarPeriodate methodQuantifiable resultsCannot be used for whole cells
UreaseAmine groupsGlutaraldehydeCan be used for whole cells since there is no endogenous urease activitySpecificity of crosslink may be uncertain
Alkaline phosphataseAmine groupNHS, maleimide-thiol couplingQuantifiable resultsCannot be used for whole cells
β-galactosidaseAmine groupSulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)-cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC)Can be used for Cell-ELISA Results reflect the true Ab-Ag reaction for higher systems since there is no indigenous β-gal activity
Table 2. Enzyme-antibody conjugates and their uses.
Methods of conjugation and uses of enzyme-conjugated antibodies

Conjugation of enzymes to antibodies can be based on the linkage of the sugar or lysine groups in the enzyme. Sodium periodate oxidation of the sugars present on glycoproteins renders them susceptible to reaction with the terminal amine (–NH2) of lysine residues in the antibody. This forms a stable covalent link between the glycoprotein and the antibody. This is the method of choice to conjugate enzymes like horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to antibodies [16].

Antibody Conjugation figure 2
Figure 2. The sodium periodate method results in a Schiff’s base between the oxidised sugar of the enzyme and the –NH2 from a lysine residue of the antibody.

Conjugation of urease to antibodies has been done by simple glutaraldehyde crosslinking. Glutaraldehyde, like dimethyl adipimate and the homologous dimethyl suberimidate, is homo-bifunctional crosslinking agents [17]. These molecules have the same active groups on both ends and a sufficiently long ‘linker’. These are generally used in protein-protein crosslinking, and therefore, antibody-enzyme conjugation. The reactive end groups target terminal amines (–NH2) of lysine and hydroxylysine on both proteins.

The advantage of using these crosslinking agents is the ease of carrying out the reaction. The proteins to be cross-linked are incubated with the reagent in a suitable amine-free buffer, and the high molecular weight proteins are separated by column chromatography. The obvious disadvantage is the non-specific crosslinking that leads to the formation of large aggregates of proteins that does not serve the purpose.

Antibody Conjugation figure 3
Figure 3. Homobifunctional crosslinking agents for enzyme-antibody conjugation.

The urease conjugate has been used in research [18] and some diagnostic tests for hepatitis [19] and syphilis [20]. The detection method for urease activity involves a colorimetric transition from yellow to purple with the evolution of ammonia in the presence of bromocresol purple. This is useful to determine empirical values. However, quantification of results can be done with β-galactosidase conjugated antibodies which also give a low background for animal cells [21]. Cell-ELISA (a precursor to labeling cells for flow cytometry), now prefers the use of β-galactosidase conjugated antibodies to urease-conjugated antibodies.

These conjugates are used in ELISAs, Western blots/dot blots, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and recently, targeting solid tumors [22].

FLIA and fluorescent dye-labeled antibodies

Fluorescent dyes have the property of absorbing one wavelength of electromagnetic radiation and then emitting the same at a longer wavelength. This Stoke’s shift is crucial for the detection of small quantities of the target compound/metabolite/ protein.

Fluorescently labeled antibodies give specificity to the binding and can be used for localization. In fluorescence labeling, a succinimidyl-ester functional group attached to a fluorophore core targets primary amines on the antibody to form a stable covalent linkage [23]. The degree of labeling of an antibody depends on the number of free primary amine groups and whether the fluorophore sterically affects the specificity, avidity or affinity of binding. Since there is a limit to the number of fluorophores that can be attached to an antibody, there is no standard that can be associated with this family of conjugated antibodies. In short, the problems with fluorochrome-labeled antibodies is too few or many fluorophores, non-specific staining and loss of antibody-antigen specificity or affinity [24]. This is why fluorophore-labeled antibodies are used more for immunohistochemistry and FACS rather than for quantitative immunoassays. Table 3 gives the natural fluorescent dyes which have been conjugated to antibodies.

Name Colour λabs λem Mol wt (Da)
Amino-methylcoumarin (AMCA)Violet-blue353442410
FluoresceinGreen495528390
RhodamineOrange550570444
PhycoerythrinOrange488575240,000
AllophycocyaninFar-red650660100,000
Table 3. Natural fluorescent dyes and their properties.

Most other commercial dyes including Alexa dyes, Texas Red, are derived from these dyes. Table 4 gives a list of fluorochromes and their emission wavelength.

Near UV Visible Near IR
Atto 425Atto 488Allopycocyanin
Atto 488Atto 532Cy5
Cy2Atto 550Atto 647
DyLight 405Cy3DyLight 649
DyLight 488Cy5Atto 655
DyLight 488Cy5.5
DyLight 549DyLight 680
Texas RedDyLight 800
Table 4. Fluorochromes that can be conjugated to antibodies.

Commercial kits offer fluorescent dyes that have an isothiocyanate modification. These dyes can be coupled to amine groups in a single step using an ‘activation’ reagent which is generally succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC). At high pH (usually pH 9.0), a highly concentrated solution of SMCC in dimethylformamide is incubated with the isothiocyanate modified fluorophore. This modifies the antibody and gets it ready to conjugate to the fluorescent tag. The tag is added, incubated for an hour at room temperature. Then a quenching reagent does away with the unused fluorescent probe. It is advisable to purify the labeled antibody by HPLC to remove the unconjugated probe. For example, Rigau M et al conjugated an anti-BTN2A1 mAb to Alexa Fluor-647 by amine coupling from Thermo Fisher, and conjugated an anti-BTN3A antibodyto R-phycoerythrin with a sulfo-SMCC heterobifunctional crosslinker [25]. Dong JX et al conjugated an anti-Homer1 nanobody to Alexa 647 using succinimidyl-Alexa 647 from Thermo Fisher (A20186) [26]. L Cantuti-Castelvetri et al labeled anti-NRP1 monoclonal antibodies with DyLight™ 488 NHS ester from Thermo Fisher Scientific [27].

Lanthanide labeled antibodies

A significant disadvantage of fluorochrome-labeled antibodies is the high background scattering (noise) and non-specific fluorescence from biological molecules that may be present in the sample. These can interfere with the measurements and limit the use of such probes. Under such conditions, lanthanide conjugated antibodies serve as ideal fluorophores with their long Stokes’ shifts and the ability to remain excited for milliseconds [28]. Han G et al published three protocols for antibody conjugation with lanthanides and other rare-earth elements [29]. For mass cytometry, Fluidigm Corporation provides kits for conjugating antibodies. Rosshart SP et al used Maxpar® antibody conjugation kits from Fluidigm Corporation to study microbiota and immune responses in laboratory mice born to wild mice [30] ; so did Guo CJ et al for their conjugation of antibodies for mass cytometry [31].

The lanthanides (sometimes called the rare earth elements) are a group of 14 ‘f-block’ elements of the Periodic table from atomic number 57(lanthanum) to 71 (lutetium). Of these, europium (Eu), dysprosium (Dy) and gadolinium (Gd) have been mainly used in biomedical imaging [32]. All these elements show 4f-5d, 4f-4f transitions, with absorption in the UV range and emission in the visible range.

Lanthanides can form chelates that generate detectable chemiluminescence. Polyaminocarboxylates (PACs), for example the linear ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and their cyclic counterparts 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,8,11- tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8-triacetic acid (DO3A) are inexpensive metal ion chelators, which form stable complexes with lanthanides. The order of binding is EDTAβ-diketones have a bidentate capacity and are not as stable. However, they have been modified to form 3:1 complex with lanthanides and can accommodate antenna molecules. The β-diketones have been part of the DELFIA system of immunoassays where they serve as solution ligands after dissociation of lanthanide tags from a non-fluorescent chelate-containing immunocomplex [28].

Antibody Conjugation figure 4
Figure 4. Chelating agents for Lanthanides.

Lanthanide chelates (especially those of Eu (III) and terbium Tb(III))] when coupled to antibodies with free amine and/or carboxyl groups through a stable isothiocyanate linker, detect tiny quantities of antigen, making the CLIA (chemiluminescence based immunoassay) the most sensitive immunoassay [33] These conjugates have been used in clinical diagnostics [34], in vitro DNA hybridizations [35], cytotoxicity assays [36], receptor-ligand binding assays [37] and as potential therapeutics for cancer [38].

Other transition metals have been explored for the detection of biological assay systems. Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescence platform uses ruthenium. Chaturvedi S et al labelled an IL-6 detection antibody through the SULFO‐TAG™ NHS‐Ester kit from MSD [39].

Other hapten-conjugated antibodies

Haptens are small antigenic molecules that need a carrier protein to elicit an immune response. While fluorescent dyes qualify as haptens, antibodies have also been conjugated to haptens such as biotin, streptavidin and biomagnetic beads for use in different techniques.

Biotin/ Streptavidin-conjugated antibodies

The noncovalent interaction between biotin and avidin (or streptavidin) has a very high Kd (dissociation constant) making the binding between the two almost irreversible [40]. Hence, conjugation of one or both the molecules to antibodies makes them ideal for detection, quantification, and localization of biomolecules in ELISAs and IHC.

Biotin has a fused heterocyclic ring with an aliphatic valeryl tail while avidin and streptavidin are proteins. The conjugation of biotin to antibodies is usually through an NHS activated molecule and an amine group on the antibody. Some commercially available activated biotin preparations come with an additional linker which allows better positioning of the molecule (see www.thermoscientific.com/pierce ). Silva MC et al used Thermo Scientific EZ-LinkNHS-PEG4-Biotinylation Kit to label tau proteins for Bio-layer interferometry biosensor assay [41]. Chaturvedi S et al conjugated an IL‐6 MSD assay capture antibody with EZ‐Link Sulfo‐NHS‐LC‐Biotin reagent from Thermo‐Pierce [39]. Streptavidin/avidin is linked to antibodies using bifunctional agents that crosslink two proteins.

Biomagnetic bead-conjugated antibodies

Magnetic beads are iron oxide particles embedded in an epoxy resin matrix with an approximate diameter of 0.5μm. These are commercially available with various activated groups such as amine (-NH2), hydrazide (-N2H), carboxyl (-COOH), iodoacetyl (-CHICOO), sulfhydryl (-SH) and aldehyde (-CHO) groups to enhance antibody attachment. To facilitate proper orientation of binding, ready-made magnetic beads conjugated to Protein A/Protein G are also available.

Recovery of the conjugate is done using a magnet, thus reducing losses during centrifugation. A single magnetic bead can bind approximately 50-70 μg of antibody. These beads have a neutral pH and allow for gentle separation of protein complexes. Amines, thiols, and urea should be avoided in the reaction buffers and antibody solutions. After conjugation BSA, glycerol and azide can be added to the storage buffer since these do not interfere with assays. Magnetic bead-conjugated antibodies are stable for up to 12-18 months at 0°C.

For example, Engle DD et al conjugated CA19-9 monoclonal antibodies 5B1 and NS19-9, EGFR clone D38B1 to Thermo Fisher M-270 Epoxy Dynabeads for immunoprecipitation [42].

Oligonucleotide-conjugated antibodies

The amalgamation of ELISA with the PCR resulted in the immune-PCR (iPCR) which was first devised by Sano et al in 1992 [43]. Here, an antibody to a target antigen is linked to a specific oligonucleotide. Upon binding of the antibody to the antigen, the DNA is amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), allowing for almost 100-10,000 fold amplification of the signals detected by normal ELISA. The level of antigen is then calculated according to the amount of oligonucleotide bound and amplified. iPCR has been used to detect viral and bacterial antigens as well as disease-specific IgG associated with mumps [44].

While the sandwich iPCR involves linker molecules such as biotin-avidin/streptavidin systems, direct linking of the specific oligonucleotide can also be conjugated to antibodies. Here, the oligo and the antibody are activated by heterobifunctional crosslinking agents that finally combine to link the former to an amine group on the antibody. A disadvantage of this method is the susceptibility of the linkage to conditions required for purification of the conjugate by chromatography. Cell Mosaic®, Innova ThunderLink and LightningLink from Expedeon supply amine-conjugated oligos and antibodies.

Oligonucleotide-conjugated antibodies are also used in the CODEX imaging technique [45].

Antibody-nanoparticle conjugation

Nanoparticles of different molecules have improved solubility and activity profiles as compared to the native molecules. When conjugated to antibodies, these can be used for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. Several conjugates have been developed by several companies including Merck & Co., Invitrogen Inc. and Miltenyi Biotech [46].

Semiconductor nanoparticles (quantum dots) conjugated to antibodies have been used in biomedical imaging. The conjugation of quantum dots to andies has been done using a popular zero-length crosslinker, EDC (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride) [47]. EDC forms neutral amide bonds between carboxyl groups and primary amines of an antibody. EDC is a water-soluble reagent that can easily be added to buffers or removed by washing with water or dilute acid. One disadvantage of this method is that the antigen binding sites of an antibody may be blocked by the non-selective formation of amide bonds at the vicinity of Fab.

Antibody Conjugation figure 5
Figure 5. Conjugation of a reporter system to an antibody using EDC.

Similarly, colloidal gold nanoparticles have been conjugated to antibodies using the carbodiimide method [48]. Different conjugation chemistry that creates an acid-labile bond using a citrate/citraconic moiety has been used in the conjugation of gold nanoparticles to antibodies for use in diagnostic imaging, for example, detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus [49], and as a drug delivery vehicle [50].

Dextran-conjugated IgD

Dextran-conjugated IgD antibodies were first used to study B-cell and T-cell activation and Ig secretion. Being a large molecule, dextran can trigger cell division even when conjugated to (otherwise non-mitogenic) monovalent Fab fragments or bivalent anti-IgM antibodies.

Today, dex-monoclonal IgG are being used to study immunoglobulin secretion, class switching of Ig genes and B cell receptor signaling [51] and IgE expression [52].

Commercially Available Antibody Conjugation Kits

To simplify antibody conjugation - especially to dyes, enzymes, and nanoparticles, there are several commercially available kits in the market. While some of these have been discussed in the context of specific labels, the most commonly used kits are those for hapten conjugation using NHS crosslinking chemistry (Table 5). Some of the kits tolerate BSA and other proteins, while others require PBS-only antibodies, which are often available from commercial suppliers. For example, Pastushok L et al labelled an Fab fragment or anti-IgG antibody in PBS buffer with Licor IRDye 800CW Protein Labeling Kit and removed free IRDye800CW from the conjugates using desalting spin columns from Thermo Scientific [53].

Company Amt of Ab Reaction conditions Time Reference
Apex (Thermo Fisher)10-20 μgtolerate BSA and contaminating proteins (e.g., ascites)15 min processing; ready to use in 2.5 hrs [54]
Zenon (Thermo Fisher)< 1-20 ugtolerate BSA and contaminating proteins (e.g., ascites)15 min processing and ready to use
Mix n Stain (Biotium)≤ 5 μg/mltolerate BSA, gelatin, glycine30 min processing and ready to use
Lightning Link (Expedeon)0.5 mg/mloptions available for the removal of BSA, glycine, azide; separate clean-up protocols for ascites or hybridoma supernatants15 (rapid range) to 3 hrs [55]
Alexa fluor (MilliporeSigma)10-50 μg/mltolerate BSA and contaminating proteins15 min processing; ready to use in 2.5 hrs
Abcam≤ 30 μg/mltolerate azide, glycerol, EDTA>20 min processing; ready in 3 hrs [56]
LYNX (Bio-Rad)0.5-1 mg/mlpH of buffer near neutralprocessing time 3 hrs
Table 5. Commercially available kits for antibody conjugation to dyes or HRP.
Purification of the Antibody Conjugate
Separation of the conjugated antibody from the free label/antibody

To ensure the efficient use of a conjugated antibody, it is necessary to purify the conjugate. When the label to be conjugated is much smaller in size than the antibody, it is possible to separate the unbound label using gel filtration chromatography. It is more difficult to separate the labeled antibody from the unlabelled antibody. To avoid this situation, an excess of the label can be used to ensure that the conjugation to the antibody is high and gel filtration chromatography can be performed.

Determination of the antibody: label ratio

The efficiency of conjugation is determined by calculating the ratio of the molecules of the reporter system that are stably attached to the antibody. This is done using spectroscopy or chromatography. To attain maximum efficiency, the concentration of the reporter system is generally ten to fifty times that of the antibody to be conjugated. The unconjugated label is then separated from the antibody conjugate by gel-filtration chromatography.

The ratio of the antibody conjugate to the free label is calculated based on the specific activity (for enzymes), fluorimetry (for fluorescent dyes) or UV-vis spectrophotometry (for oligonucleotides) [57]. The specific activity or absorbance of the conjugate is compared to that of the free label to determine the conjugation ratio (see Table 6).

Label Detection of free label Determination of conjugation ratio
EnzymeEnzyme activitySpecific activity of conjugate/ specific activity of total enzyme – specific activity of free enzyme
Fluorescent dyeFluorescenceAbsorbance of conjugate/absorbance of total label- absorbance of free label
Lanthanide chelateFluorescenceAbsorbance of conjugate/ absorbance of total chelate- absorbance of free chelate
OligonucleotideAbsorbance at 260nmAbsorbance of conjugate/absorbance of total oligo- absorbance of free oligo
Table 6. Determination of conjugation ratio for various types of labels.

The efficiency of conjugation can be calculated using the following equation (A280 conjugated antibody / A280 unconjugated antibody) X 100.

Storage of Conjugated Antibodies

Most antibody conjugate preparations are generally stable up to six months at 4°C. Freeze-thaw of antibodies is not recommended. Should one want to store the conjugate at -20°C, 20% glycerol should be included in the buffer. Fluorescent dye or lanthanide-chelate-tagged antibodies should be stored in the dark. To prevent contamination of the conjugated antibody preparation, preservatives such as 0.1% azide or thiomersol may be added.

The Future of Antibody Conjugates

Antibody conjugates have come a long way since the first fluorophore was attached to antibodies in 1942. With better linkers and controlled reactions, it is now possible to design conjugates that can deliver specific results. The generation of conjugates has gathered momentum in the last two decades because of the successful production of at least two antibody-conjugated drugs. Most research in the field involves simple conjugation chemistry to generate antibody conjugates with greater flexibility and stability. The development of a single step protocol with commercially available derivatized reporter systems would be ideal for better results in research, diagnostics and therapy.

References
  1. Koenig P, Das H, Liu H, Kummerer B, Gohr F, Jenster L, et al. Structure-guided multivalent nanobodies block SARS-CoV-2 infection and suppress mutational escape. Science. 2021;: pubmed publisher
  2. Crowley S, Bruck P, Bhuiyan M, Mitchell Gears A, Walsh M, Zhangxu K, et al. Neoleukin-2 enhances anti-tumour immunity downstream of peptide vaccination targeted by an anti-MHC class II VHH. Open Biol. 2020;10:190235 pubmed publisher
  3. Divine R, Dang H, Ueda G, Fallas J, Vulovic I, Sheffler W, et al. Designed proteins assemble antibodies into modular nanocages. Science. 2021;372: pubmed publisher
  4. Brinkley M. A brief survey of methods for preparing protein conjugates with dyes, haptens, and cross-linking reagents. Bioconjug Chem. 1992;3:2-13 pubmed
  5. Vlasak J, Ionescu R. Fragmentation of monoclonal antibodies. MAbs. 2011;3:253-63 pubmed
  6. Ducancel F, Muller B. Molecular engineering of antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. MAbs. 2012;4:445-57 pubmed publisher
  7. McCombs J, Owen S. Antibody drug conjugates: design and selection of linker, payload and conjugation chemistry. AAPS J. 2015;17:339-51 pubmed publisher
  8. Hondal R. Incorporation of selenocysteine into proteins using peptide ligation. Protein Pept Lett. 2005;12:757-64 pubmed
  9. Zimmerman E, Heibeck T, Gill A, Li X, Murray C, Madlansacay M, et al. Production of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using optimized non-natural amino acids in a cell-free expression system. Bioconjug Chem. 2014;25:351-61 pubmed publisher
  10. Pillow T, Adhikari P, Blake R, Chen J, Del Rosario G, Deshmukh G, et al. Antibody Conjugation of a Chimeric BET Degrader Enables in vivo Activity. ChemMedChem. 2020;15:17-25 pubmed publisher
  11. Traut R, Bollen A, Sun T, Hershey J, Sundberg J, Pierce L. Methyl 4-mercaptobutyrimidate as a cleavable cross-linking reagent and its application to the Escherichia coli 30S ribosome. Biochemistry. 1973;12:3266-73 pubmed
  12. Knight P. Hydrolysis of p-NN'-phenylenebismaleimide and its adducts with cysteine. Implications for cross-linking of proteins. Biochem J. 1979;179:191-7 pubmed
  13. Carlsson J, Drevin H, Axen R. Protein thiolation and reversible protein-protein conjugation. N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate, a new heterobifunctional reagent. Biochem J. 1978;173:723-37 pubmed
  14. Peeters J, Hazendonk T, Beuvery E, Tesser G. Comparison of four bifunctional reagents for coupling peptides to proteins and the effect of the three moieties on the immunogenicity of the conjugates. J Immunol Methods. 1989;120:133-43 pubmed
  15. Hashida S, Imagawa M, Inoue S, Ruan K, Ishikawa E. More useful maleimide compounds for the conjugation of Fab' to horseradish peroxidase through thiol groups in the hinge. J Appl Biochem. 1984;6:56-63 pubmed
  16. Avrameas S, Ternynck T. Peroxidase labelled antibody and Fab conjugates with enhanced intracellular penetration. Immunochemistry. 1971;8:1175-9 pubmed
  17. Richards F, Knowles J. Glutaraldehyde as a protein cross-linkage reagent. J Mol Biol. 1968;37:231-3 pubmed
  18. Chandler H, Cox J, Healey K, MacGregor A, Premier R, Hurrell J. An investigation of the use of urease-antibody conjugates in enzyme immunoassays. J Immunol Methods. 1982;53:187-94 pubmed
  19. Coulepis A, Veale M, MacGregor A, Kornitschuk M, Gust I. Detection of hepatitis A virus and antibody by solid-phase radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22:119-24 pubmed
  20. White T, Fuller S. Visuwell Reagin, a non-treponemal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the serodiagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2300-4 pubmed
  21. Liu Z, Gurlo T, von Grafenstein H. Cell-ELISA using beta-galactosidase conjugated antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 2000;234:P153-67 pubmed
  22. Tian B, Wong W, Hegmann E, Gaspar K, Kumar P, Chao H. Production and characterization of a camelid single domain antibody-urease enzyme conjugate for the treatment of cancer. Bioconjug Chem. 2015;26:1144-55 pubmed publisher
  23. Vira S, Mekhedov E, Humphrey G, Blank P. Fluorescent-labeled antibodies: Balancing functionality and degree of labeling. Anal Biochem. 2010;402:146-50 pubmed publisher
  24. Szabó A, Szendi Szatmári T, Ujlaky Nagy L, Rádi I, Vereb G, Szollosi J, et al. The Effect of Fluorophore Conjugation on Antibody Affinity and the Photophysical Properties of Dyes. Biophys J. 2018;114:688-700 pubmed publisher
  25. Rigau M, Ostrouska S, Fulford T, Johnson D, Woods K, Ruan Z, et al. Butyrophilin 2A1 is essential for phosphoantigen reactivity by γδ T cells. Science. 2020;367: pubmed publisher
  26. Dong J, Lee Y, Kirmiz M, Palacio S, Dumitras C, Moreno C, et al. A toolbox of nanobodies developed and validated for use as intrabodies and nanoscale immunolabels in brain neurons. elife. 2019;8: pubmed publisher
  27. Cantuti Castelvetri L, Ojha R, Pedro L, Djannatian M, Franz J, Kuivanen S, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  28. Hagan A, Zuchner T. Lanthanide-based time-resolved luminescence immunoassays. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400:2847-64 pubmed publisher
  29. Han G, Spitzer M, Bendall S, Fantl W, Nolan G. Metal-isotope-tagged monoclonal antibodies for high-dimensional mass cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:2121-2148 pubmed publisher
  30. Rosshart S, Herz J, Vassallo B, Hunter A, Wall M, Badger J, et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science. 2019;365: pubmed publisher
  31. Guo C, Allen B, Hiam K, Dodd D, Van Treuren W, Higginbottom S, et al. Depletion of microbiome-derived molecules in the host using Clostridium genetics. Science. 2019;366: pubmed publisher
  32. Bottrill M, Kwok L, Long N. Lanthanides in magnetic resonance imaging. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:557-71 pubmed
  33. Bacigalupo M, Meroni G, Secundo F, Scalera C, Quici S. Antibodies conjugated with new highly luminescent Eu3+ and Tb3+ chelates as markers for time resolved immunoassays. Application to simultaneous determination of clenbuterol and free cortisol in horse urine. Talanta. 2009;80:954-8 pubmed publisher
  34. Ye Y, Hu Z, Liu J, Chen G, Zhou Y. A new Eu(3+)-labeled method for anticardiolipin antibody IgM. J Clin Lab Anal. 2014;28:335-40 pubmed publisher
  35. Fernández Moreira V, Song B, Sivagnanam V, Chauvin A, Vandevyver C, Gijs M, et al. Bioconjugated lanthanide luminescent helicates as multilabels for lab-on-a-chip detection of cancer biomarkers. Analyst. 2010;135:42-52 pubmed publisher
  36. Brouwers A, van Eerd J, Frielink C, Oosterwijk E, Oyen W, Corstens F, et al. Optimization of radioimmunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma: labeling of monoclonal antibody cG250 with 131I, 90Y, 177Lu, or 186Re. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:327-37 pubmed
  37. Vera D, Eigner S, Henke K, Lebeda O, Melichar F, Beran M. Preparation and preclinical evaluation of 177Lu-nimotuzumab targeting epidermal growth factor receptor overexpressing tumors. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39:3-13 pubmed publisher
  38. Stein R, Govindan S, Chen S, Reed L, Richel H, Griffiths G, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of a human lung cancer xenograft with monoclonal antibody RS7: evaluation of (177)Lu and comparison of its efficacy with that of (90)Y and residualizing (131)I. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:967-74 pubmed
  39. Chaturvedi S, Siegel D, Wagner C, Park J, van de Velde H, Vermeulen J, et al. Development and validation of panoptic Meso scale discovery assay to quantify total systemic interleukin-6. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:687-97 pubmed publisher
  40. Bratthauer G. The avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method and other avidin-biotin binding methods. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;588:257-70 pubmed publisher
  41. Silva M, Ferguson F, Cai Q, Donovan K, Nandi G, Patnaik D, et al. Targeted degradation of aberrant tau in frontotemporal dementia patient-derived neuronal cell models. elife. 2019;8: pubmed publisher
  42. Engle D, Tiriac H, Rivera K, Pommier A, Whalen S, Oni T, et al. The glycan CA19-9 promotes pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in mice. Science. 2019;364:1156-1162 pubmed publisher
  43. Sano T, Smith C, Cantor C. Immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of specific antibody-DNA conjugates. Science. 1992;258:120-2 pubmed
  44. Malou N, Raoult D. Immuno-PCR: a promising ultrasensitive diagnostic method to detect antigens and antibodies. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:295-302 pubmed publisher
  45. Palla A, Ravichandran M, Wang Y, Alexandrova L, Yang A, Kraft P, et al. Inhibition of prostaglandin-degrading enzyme 15-PGDH rejuvenates aged muscle mass and strength. Science. 2020;: pubmed publisher
  46. Cardoso M, Peca I, Roque A. Antibody-conjugated nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:3103-27 pubmed
  47. East D, Todd M, Bruce I. Quantum dot-antibody conjugates via carbodiimide-mediated coupling for cellular imaging. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1199:67-83 pubmed publisher
  48. Tan G, Kantner K, Zhang Q, Soliman M, del Pino P, Parak W, et al. Conjugation of Polymer-Coated Gold Nanoparticles with Antibodies-Synthesis and Characterization. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2015;5:1297-1316 pubmed publisher
  49. Silva P, Silva J, Rodrigues M, Vieira J, Andrade I, Nagata T, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus via dynamic light scattering using antibody-gold nanoparticle bioconjugates against viral spike protein. Talanta. 2022;243:123355 pubmed publisher
  50. Geng S, Wu J, Alam M, Schultz J, Dickinson C, Seminer C, et al. Facile Preparation of Stable Antibody-Gold Conjugates and Application to Affinity-Capture Self-Interaction Nanoparticle Spectroscopy. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2287-2300 pubmed
  51. Pecanha L, Snapper C, Finkelman F, Mond J. Dextran-conjugated anti-Ig antibodies as a model for T cell-independent type 2 antigen-mediated stimulation of Ig secretion in vitro. I. Lymphokine dependence. J Immunol. 1991;146:833-9 pubmed
  52. Pecanha L, Yamaguchi H, Lees A, Noelle R, Mond J, Snapper C. Dextran-conjugated anti-IgD antibodies inhibit T cell-mediated IgE production but augment the synthesis of IgM and IgG. J Immunol. 1993;150:2160-8 pubmed
  53. Pastushok L, Fu Y, Lin L, Luo Y, DeCoteau J, Lee K, et al. A Novel Cell-Penetrating Antibody Fragment Inhibits the DNA Repair Protein RAD51. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11227 pubmed publisher
  54. Prill H, Luu A, Yip B, Holtzinger J, Lo M, Christianson T, et al. Differential Uptake of NAGLU-IGF2 and Unmodified NAGLU in Cellular Models of Sanfilippo Syndrome Type B. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2019;14:56-63 pubmed publisher
  55. Chew H, De Lima P, Gonzalez Cruz J, Banushi B, Echejoh G, Hu L, et al. Endocytosis Inhibition in Humans to Improve Responses to ADCC-Mediating Antibodies. Cell. 2020;180:895-914.e27 pubmed publisher
  56. Chi Y, Remšík J, Kiseliovas V, Derderian C, Sener U, Alghader M, et al. Cancer cells deploy lipocalin-2 to collect limiting iron in leptomeningeal metastasis. Science. 2020;369:276-282 pubmed publisher
  57. Chen Y. Drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) by UV/Vis spectroscopy. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1045:267-73 pubmed publisher
ISSN : 2329-5139